PrivacyCube: Data Physicalization for Enhancing Privacy Awareness in IoT

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2406.05451v1
• Date: Sat, 8 Jun 2024 12:20:42 GMT
• Title: PrivacyCube: Data Physicalization for Enhancing Privacy Awareness in IoT
• Authors: Bayan Al Muhander, Nalin Arachchilage, Yasar Majib, Mohammed Alosaimi, Omer Rana, Charith Perera,
• Abstract summary: We describe PrivacyCube, a novel data physicalization designed to increase privacy awareness within smart home environments. PrivacyCube visualizes IoT data consumption by displaying privacy-related notices. Our results show that PrivacyCube helps home occupants comprehend IoT privacy better with significantly increased privacy awareness.
• Score: 1.2564343689544843
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: People are increasingly bringing Internet of Things (IoT) devices into their homes without understanding how their data is gathered, processed, and used. We describe PrivacyCube, a novel data physicalization designed to increase privacy awareness within smart home environments. PrivacyCube visualizes IoT data consumption by displaying privacy-related notices. PrivacyCube aims to assist smart home occupants to (i) understand their data privacy better and (ii) have conversations around data management practices of IoT devices used within their homes. Using PrivacyCube, households can learn and make informed privacy decisions collectively. To evaluate PrivacyCube, we used multiple research methods throughout the different stages of design. We first conducted a focus group study in two stages with six participants to compare PrivacyCube to text and state-of-the-art privacy policies. We then deployed PrivacyCube in a 14-day-long field study with eight households. Our results show that PrivacyCube helps home occupants comprehend IoT privacy better with significantly increased privacy awareness at p < .05 (p=0.00041, t= -5.57). Participants preferred PrivacyCube over text privacy policies because it was comprehensive and easier to use. PrivacyCube and Privacy Label, a state-of-the-art approach, both received positive reviews from participants, with PrivacyCube being preferred for its interactivity and ability to encourage conversations. PrivacyCube was also considered by home occupants as a piece of home furniture, encouraging them to socialize and discuss IoT privacy implications using this device.

Related papers

• Masked Differential Privacy [64.32494202656801]
  We propose an effective approach called masked differential privacy (DP), which allows for controlling sensitive regions where differential privacy is applied. Our method operates selectively on data and allows for defining non-sensitive-temporal regions without DP application or combining differential privacy with other privacy techniques within data samples.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-22T15:22:53Z)
• PrivacyLens: Evaluating Privacy Norm Awareness of Language Models in Action [54.11479432110771]
  PrivacyLens is a novel framework designed to extend privacy-sensitive seeds into expressive vignettes and further into agent trajectories. We instantiate PrivacyLens with a collection of privacy norms grounded in privacy literature and crowdsourced seeds. State-of-the-art LMs, like GPT-4 and Llama-3-70B, leak sensitive information in 25.68% and 38.69% of cases, even when prompted with privacy-enhancing instructions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-29T17:58:38Z)
• PrivacyRestore: Privacy-Preserving Inference in Large Language Models via Privacy Removal and Restoration [18.11846784025521]
  PrivacyRestore is a plug-and-play method to protect the privacy of user inputs during inference. We create three datasets, covering medical and legal domains, to evaluate the effectiveness of PrivacyRestore.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-03T14:57:39Z)
• Position: Considerations for Differentially Private Learning with Large-Scale Public Pretraining [75.25943383604266]
  We question whether the use of large Web-scraped datasets should be viewed as differential-privacy-preserving. We caution that publicizing these models pretrained on Web data as "private" could lead to harm and erode the public's trust in differential privacy as a meaningful definition of privacy. We conclude by discussing potential paths forward for the field of private learning, as public pretraining becomes more popular and powerful.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-13T10:41:12Z)
• How Do Input Attributes Impact the Privacy Loss in Differential Privacy? [55.492422758737575]
  We study the connection between the per-subject norm in DP neural networks and individual privacy loss. We introduce a novel metric termed the Privacy Loss-Input Susceptibility (PLIS) which allows one to apportion the subject's privacy loss to their input attributes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-18T11:39:03Z)
• Privacy Explanations - A Means to End-User Trust [64.7066037969487]
  We looked into how explainability might help to tackle this problem. We created privacy explanations that aim to help to clarify to end users why and for what purposes specific data is required. Our findings reveal that privacy explanations can be an important step towards increasing trust in software systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-18T09:30:37Z)
• Momentum Gradient Descent Federated Learning with Local Differential Privacy [10.60240656423935]
  In the big data era, the privacy of personal information has been more pronounced. In this article, we propose integrating federated learning and local differential privacy with momentum gradient descent to improve the performance of machine learning models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-28T13:30:38Z)
• The Evolving Path of "the Right to Be Left Alone" - When Privacy Meets Technology [0.0]
  This paper proposes a novel vision of the privacy ecosystem, introducing privacy dimensions, the related users' expectations, the privacy violations, and the changing factors. We believe that promising approaches to tackle the privacy challenges move in two directions: (i) identification of effective privacy metrics; and (ii) adoption of formal tools to design privacy-compliant applications.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-24T11:27:55Z)
• User Perception of Privacy with Ubiquitous Devices [5.33024001730262]
  This study aims to explore and discover various concerns related to perception of privacy in this era of ubiquitous technologies. Key themes like attitude towards privacy in public and private spaces, privacy awareness, consent seeking, dilemmas/confusions related to various technologies, impact of attitude and beliefs on individuals actions regarding how to protect oneself from invasion of privacy in both public and private spaces.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-23T05:01:44Z)
• Private Reinforcement Learning with PAC and Regret Guarantees [69.4202374491817]
  We design privacy preserving exploration policies for episodic reinforcement learning (RL) We first provide a meaningful privacy formulation using the notion of joint differential privacy (JDP) We then develop a private optimism-based learning algorithm that simultaneously achieves strong PAC and regret bounds, and enjoys a JDP guarantee.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-18T20:18:35Z)
• Dis-Empowerment Online: An Investigation of Privacy-Sharing Perceptions & Method Preferences [6.09170287691728]
  We find that perception of privacy empowerment differs from that of sharing across dimensions of meaningfulness, competence and choice. We find similarities and differences in privacy method preference between the US, UK and Germany. By mapping the perception of privacy dis-empowerment into patterns of privacy behavior online, this paper provides an important foundation for future research.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-03-19T19:17:55Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.