Automated Question Generation for Science Tests in Arabic Language Using NLP Techniques

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2406.08520v1
• Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2024 20:27:45 GMT
• Title: Automated Question Generation for Science Tests in Arabic Language Using NLP Techniques
• Abstract summary: This research presents an innovative Arabic question-generation system built upon a three-stage process. The proposed approach and results show a precision of 83.50%, a recall of 78.68%, and an Fl score of 80.95%.
• Score: 5.233512464561313
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Question generation for education assessments is a growing field within artificial intelligence applied to education. These question-generation tools have significant importance in the educational technology domain, such as intelligent tutoring systems and dialogue-based platforms. The automatic generation of assessment questions, which entail clear-cut answers, usually relies on syntactical and semantic indications within declarative sentences, which are then transformed into questions. Recent research has explored the generation of assessment educational questions in Arabic. The reported performance has been adversely affected by inherent errors, including sentence parsing inaccuracies, name entity recognition issues, and errors stemming from rule-based question transformation. Furthermore, the complexity of lengthy Arabic sentences has contributed to these challenges. This research presents an innovative Arabic question-generation system built upon a three-stage process: keywords and key phrases extraction, question generation, and subsequent ranking. The aim is to tackle the difficulties associated with automatically generating assessment questions in the Arabic language. The proposed approach and results show a precision of 83.50%, a recall of 78.68%, and an Fl score of 80.95%, indicating the framework high efficiency. Human evaluation further confirmed the model efficiency, receiving an average rating of 84%.

Related papers

• Subjective Question Generation and Answer Evaluation using NLP [0.0]
  This research aims to improve current NLP models or make a novel one for automated subjective question generation and answer evaluation from text input.<n>An automated system to generate subjective questions and evaluate the answers can help teachers assess student work and enhance the student's learning experience.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-19T07:11:50Z)
• FEANEL: A Benchmark for Fine-Grained Error Analysis in K-12 English Writing [68.23874413455594]
  We present the Fine-grained Error ANalysis for English learners (FEANEL) Benchmark.<n>The benchmark comprises 1,000 essays written by elementary and secondary school students.<n>Each error is annotated by language education experts and categorized by type, severity, and explanatory feedback, using a part-of-speech-based taxonomy they co-developed.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-28T05:17:45Z)
• Do LLMs Understand Your Translations? Evaluating Paragraph-level MT with Question Answering [68.3400058037817]
  We introduce TREQA (Translation Evaluation via Question-Answering), a framework that extrinsically evaluates translation quality. We show that TREQA is competitive with and, in some cases, outperforms state-of-the-art neural and LLM-based metrics in ranking alternative paragraph-level translations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-10T09:24:54Z)
• Exploring the Potential of Large Language Models for Estimating the Reading Comprehension Question Difficulty [2.335292678914151]
  This study investigates the effectiveness of Large Language Models (LLMs) in estimating the difficulty of reading comprehension questions. We use OpenAI's GPT-4o and o1, in estimating the difficulty of reading comprehension questions using the Study Aid and Reading Assessment (SARA) dataset. The results indicate that while the models yield difficulty estimates that align meaningfully with derived IRT parameters, there are notable differences in their sensitivity to extreme item characteristics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-25T02:28:48Z)
• The Future of Learning in the Age of Generative AI: Automated Question Generation and Assessment with Large Language Models [0.0]
  Large language models (LLMs) and generative AI have revolutionized natural language processing (NLP) This chapter explores the transformative potential of LLMs in automated question generation and answer assessment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-12T15:54:53Z)
• Could ChatGPT get an Engineering Degree? Evaluating Higher Education Vulnerability to AI Assistants [175.9723801486487]
  We evaluate whether two AI assistants, GPT-3.5 and GPT-4, can adequately answer assessment questions. GPT-4 answers an average of 65.8% of questions correctly, and can even produce the correct answer across at least one prompting strategy for 85.1% of questions. Our results call for revising program-level assessment design in higher education in light of advances in generative AI.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-07T12:11:49Z)
• FairytaleQA Translated: Enabling Educational Question and Answer Generation in Less-Resourced Languages [0.0]
  This paper introduces machine-translated versions of FairytaleQA, a renowned QA dataset designed to assess and enhance narrative comprehension skills in young children. We employ fine-tuned, modest-scale models to establish benchmarks for both Question Generation (QG) and QA tasks within the translated datasets. We present a case study proposing a model for generating question-answer pairs, with an evaluation incorporating quality metrics such as question well-formedness, answerability, relevance, and children suitability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-06T16:31:47Z)
• Connecting Humanities and Social Sciences: Applying Language and Speech Technology to Online Panel Surveys [2.0646127669654835]
  We explore the application of language and speech technology to open-ended questions in a Dutch panel survey. In an experimental wave respondents could choose to answer open questions via speech or keyboard. We report the errors the ASR system produces and investigate the impact of these errors on downstream analyses.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-21T10:52:15Z)
• A Feasibility Study of Answer-Unaware Question Generation for Education [14.434418277566383]
  We show that a significant portion of errors in such systems arise from asking irrelevant or uninterpretable questions. We find that giving these models human-written summaries instead of the original text results in a significant increase in acceptability of generated questions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-16T15:16:18Z)
• Pre-trained Transformer-Based Approach for Arabic Question Answering : A Comparative Study [0.5801044612920815]
  We evaluate the state-of-the-art pre-trained transformers models for Arabic QA using four reading comprehension datasets. We fine-tuned and compared the performance of the AraBERTv2-base model, AraBERTv0.2-large model, and AraELECTRA model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-10T12:33:18Z)
• AES Systems Are Both Overstable And Oversensitive: Explaining Why And Proposing Defenses [66.49753193098356]
  We investigate the reason behind the surprising adversarial brittleness of scoring models. Our results indicate that autoscoring models, despite getting trained as "end-to-end" models, behave like bag-of-words models. We propose detection-based protection models that can detect oversensitivity and overstability causing samples with high accuracies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-24T03:49:38Z)
• NUVA: A Naming Utterance Verifier for Aphasia Treatment [49.114436579008476]
  Assessment of speech performance using picture naming tasks is a key method for both diagnosis and monitoring of responses to treatment interventions by people with aphasia (PWA) Here we present NUVA, an utterance verification system incorporating a deep learning element that classifies 'correct' versus'incorrect' naming attempts from aphasic stroke patients. When tested on eight native British-English speaking PWA the system's performance accuracy ranged between 83.6% to 93.6%, with a 10-fold cross-validation mean of 89.5%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-10T13:00:29Z)
• My Teacher Thinks The World Is Flat! Interpreting Automatic Essay Scoring Mechanism [71.34160809068996]
  Recent work shows that automated scoring systems are prone to even common-sense adversarial samples. We utilize recent advances in interpretability to find the extent to which features such as coherence, content and relevance are important for automated scoring mechanisms. We also find that since the models are not semantically grounded with world-knowledge and common sense, adding false facts such as the world is flat'' actually increases the score instead of decreasing it.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-27T06:19:20Z)
• Curious Case of Language Generation Evaluation Metrics: A Cautionary Tale [52.663117551150954]
  A few popular metrics remain as the de facto metrics to evaluate tasks such as image captioning and machine translation. This is partly due to ease of use, and partly because researchers expect to see them and know how to interpret them. In this paper, we urge the community for more careful consideration of how they automatically evaluate their models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-26T13:57:20Z)
• Evaluating Factuality in Generation with Dependency-level Entailment [57.5316011554622]
  We propose a new formulation of entailment that decomposes it at the level of dependency arcs. We show that our dependency arc entailment model trained on this data can identify factual inconsistencies in paraphrasing and summarization better than sentence-level methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-12T06:43:10Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.