SciKnowEval: Evaluating Multi-level Scientific Knowledge of Large Language Models

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2406.09098v3
• Date: Tue, 08 Oct 2024 03:44:25 GMT
• Title: SciKnowEval: Evaluating Multi-level Scientific Knowledge of Large Language Models
• Authors: Kehua Feng, Keyan Ding, Weijie Wang, Xiang Zhuang, Zeyuan Wang, Ming Qin, Yu Zhao, Jianhua Yao, Qiang Zhang, Huajun Chen,
• Abstract summary: We introduce the SciKnowEval benchmark, a framework that evaluates large language models (LLMs) across five progressive levels of scientific knowledge. These levels aim to assess the breadth and depth of scientific knowledge in LLMs, including memory, comprehension, reasoning, discernment, and application. We benchmark 26 advanced open-source and proprietary LLMs using zero-shot and few-shot prompting strategies.
• Score: 35.98892300665275
• License:
• Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) have gained increasing prominence in scientific research, but there is a lack of comprehensive benchmarks to fully evaluate their proficiency in understanding and mastering scientific knowledge. To address this need, we introduce the SciKnowEval benchmark, a novel framework that systematically evaluates LLMs across five progressive levels of scientific knowledge: studying extensively, inquiring earnestly, thinking profoundly, discerning clearly, and practicing assiduously. These levels aim to assess the breadth and depth of scientific knowledge in LLMs, including memory, comprehension, reasoning, discernment, and application. Specifically, we first construct a large-scale evaluation dataset encompassing 70K multi-level scientific problems and solutions in the domains of biology, chemistry, physics, and materials science. By leveraging this dataset, we benchmark 26 advanced open-source and proprietary LLMs using zero-shot and few-shot prompting strategies. The results reveal that despite the state-of-the-art performance of proprietary LLMs, there is still significant room for improvement, particularly in addressing scientific reasoning and applications. We anticipate that SciKnowEval will establish a standard for benchmarking LLMs in science research and promote the development of stronger scientific LLMs. The dataset and code are publicly available at https://scimind.ai/sciknoweval .

Related papers

• SciLitLLM: How to Adapt LLMs for Scientific Literature Understanding [22.131371019641417]
  Despite Large Language Models' success, they face challenges in scientific literature understanding. We propose a hybrid strategy that integrates continual pre-training (CPT) and supervised fine-tuning (SFT) We present a suite of LLMs: SciLitLLM, specialized in scientific literature understanding.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-28T05:41:52Z)
• A Comprehensive Survey of Scientific Large Language Models and Their Applications in Scientific Discovery [68.48094108571432]
  Large language models (LLMs) have revolutionized the way text and other modalities of data are handled. We aim to provide a more holistic view of the research landscape by unveiling cross-field and cross-modal connections between scientific LLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-16T08:03:24Z)
• Mapping the Increasing Use of LLMs in Scientific Papers [99.67983375899719]
  We conduct the first systematic, large-scale analysis across 950,965 papers published between January 2020 and February 2024 on the arXiv, bioRxiv, and Nature portfolio journals. Our findings reveal a steady increase in LLM usage, with the largest and fastest growth observed in Computer Science papers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-01T17:45:15Z)
• SciAssess: Benchmarking LLM Proficiency in Scientific Literature Analysis [26.111514038691837]
  SciAssess is a benchmark for the comprehensive evaluation of Large Language Models (LLMs) in scientific literature analysis. It aims to thoroughly assess the efficacy of LLMs by evaluating their capabilities in Memorization (L1), memorization (L2), and Analysis & Reasoning (L3) It encompasses a variety of tasks drawn from diverse scientific fields, including biology, chemistry, material, and medicine.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-04T12:19:28Z)
• Scientific Large Language Models: A Survey on Biological & Chemical Domains [47.97810890521825]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have emerged as a transformative power in enhancing natural language comprehension. The application of LLMs extends beyond conventional linguistic boundaries, encompassing specialized linguistic systems developed within various scientific disciplines. As a burgeoning area in the community of AI for Science, scientific LLMs warrant comprehensive exploration.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-26T05:33:34Z)
• Exploring the Cognitive Knowledge Structure of Large Language Models: An Educational Diagnostic Assessment Approach [50.125704610228254]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have not only exhibited exceptional performance across various tasks, but also demonstrated sparks of intelligence. Recent studies have focused on assessing their capabilities on human exams and revealed their impressive competence in different domains. We conduct an evaluation using MoocRadar, a meticulously annotated human test dataset based on Bloom taxonomy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-12T09:55:45Z)
• SciEval: A Multi-Level Large Language Model Evaluation Benchmark for Scientific Research [11.816426823341134]
  We propose SciEval, a comprehensive and multi-disciplinary evaluation benchmark to address these issues. Based on Bloom's taxonomy, SciEval covers four dimensions to systematically evaluate scientific research ability. Both objective and subjective questions are included in SciEval.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-25T03:05:33Z)
• SciBench: Evaluating College-Level Scientific Problem-Solving Abilities of Large Language Models [70.5763210869525]
  We introduce an expansive benchmark suite SciBench for Large Language Model (LLM) SciBench contains a dataset featuring a range of collegiate-level scientific problems from mathematics, chemistry, and physics domains. The results reveal that the current LLMs fall short of delivering satisfactory performance, with the best overall score of merely 43.22%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-20T07:01:57Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.