JailbreakEval: An Integrated Toolkit for Evaluating Jailbreak Attempts Against Large Language Models
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2406.09321v1
- Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2024 16:59:43 GMT
- Title: JailbreakEval: An Integrated Toolkit for Evaluating Jailbreak Attempts Against Large Language Models
- Authors: Delong Ran, Jinyuan Liu, Yichen Gong, Jingyi Zheng, Xinlei He, Tianshuo Cong, Anyu Wang,
- Abstract summary: Jailbreak attacks aim to induce Large Language Models (LLMs) to generate harmful responses for forbidden instructions.
There is (surprisingly) no consensus on how to evaluate whether a jailbreak attempt is successful.
JailbreakEval is a user-friendly toolkit focusing on the evaluation of jailbreak attempts.
- Score: 21.854909839996612
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Jailbreak attacks aim to induce Large Language Models (LLMs) to generate harmful responses for forbidden instructions, presenting severe misuse threats to LLMs. Up to now, research into jailbreak attacks and defenses is emerging, however, there is (surprisingly) no consensus on how to evaluate whether a jailbreak attempt is successful. In other words, the methods to assess the harmfulness of an LLM's response are varied, such as manual annotation or prompting GPT-4 in specific ways. Each approach has its own set of strengths and weaknesses, impacting their alignment with human values, as well as the time and financial cost. This diversity in evaluation presents challenges for researchers in choosing suitable evaluation methods and conducting fair comparisons across different jailbreak attacks and defenses. In this paper, we conduct a comprehensive analysis of jailbreak evaluation methodologies, drawing from nearly ninety jailbreak research released between May 2023 and April 2024. Our study introduces a systematic taxonomy of jailbreak evaluators, offering in-depth insights into their strengths and weaknesses, along with the current status of their adaptation. Moreover, to facilitate subsequent research, we propose JailbreakEval, a user-friendly toolkit focusing on the evaluation of jailbreak attempts. It includes various well-known evaluators out-of-the-box, so that users can obtain evaluation results with only a single command. JailbreakEval also allows users to customize their own evaluation workflow in a unified framework with the ease of development and comparison. In summary, we regard JailbreakEval to be a catalyst that simplifies the evaluation process in jailbreak research and fosters an inclusive standard for jailbreak evaluation within the community.
Related papers
- WildTeaming at Scale: From In-the-Wild Jailbreaks to (Adversarially) Safer Language Models [66.34505141027624]
We introduce WildTeaming, an automatic LLM safety red-teaming framework that mines in-the-wild user-chatbot interactions to discover 5.7K unique clusters of novel jailbreak tactics.
WildTeaming reveals previously unidentified vulnerabilities of frontier LLMs, resulting in up to 4.6x more diverse and successful adversarial attacks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-26T17:31:22Z) - AutoJailbreak: Exploring Jailbreak Attacks and Defenses through a Dependency Lens [83.08119913279488]
We present a systematic analysis of the dependency relationships in jailbreak attack and defense techniques.
We propose three comprehensive, automated, and logical frameworks.
We show that the proposed ensemble jailbreak attack and defense framework significantly outperforms existing research.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-06T07:24:41Z) - JailbreakLens: Visual Analysis of Jailbreak Attacks Against Large Language Models [13.720094902597417]
JailbreakLens is a visual analysis system that enables users to explore the jailbreak performance against the target model.
We demonstrate our system's effectiveness in helping users evaluate model security and identify model weaknesses.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-12T19:54:42Z) - Rethinking How to Evaluate Language Model Jailbreak [16.301224741410312]
We propose three metrics, safeguard violation, informativeness, and relative truthfulness, to evaluate language model jailbreak.
We evaluate our metrics on a benchmark dataset produced from three malicious intent datasets and three jailbreak systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-09T15:54:16Z) - JailbreakBench: An Open Robustness Benchmark for Jailbreaking Large Language Models [123.66104233291065]
Jailbreak attacks cause large language models (LLMs) to generate harmful, unethical, or otherwise objectionable content.
evaluating these attacks presents a number of challenges, which the current collection of benchmarks and evaluation techniques do not adequately address.
JailbreakBench is an open-sourced benchmark with the following components.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-28T02:44:02Z) - EasyJailbreak: A Unified Framework for Jailbreaking Large Language Models [53.87416566981008]
This paper introduces EasyJailbreak, a unified framework simplifying the construction and evaluation of jailbreak attacks against Large Language Models (LLMs)
It builds jailbreak attacks using four components: Selector, Mutator, Constraint, and Evaluator.
Our validation across 10 distinct LLMs reveals a significant vulnerability, with an average breach probability of 60% under various jailbreaking attacks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-18T18:39:53Z) - A StrongREJECT for Empty Jailbreaks [74.66228107886751]
There is no standard benchmark for measuring the severity of a jailbreak.
We present StrongREJECT, which better discriminates between effective and ineffective jailbreaks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-15T18:58:09Z) - Comprehensive Assessment of Jailbreak Attacks Against LLMs [28.58973312098698]
We study 13 cutting-edge jailbreak methods from four categories, 160 questions from 16 violation categories, and six popular LLMs.
Our experimental results demonstrate that the optimized jailbreak prompts consistently achieve the highest attack success rates.
We discuss the trade-off between the attack performance and efficiency, as well as show that the transferability of the jailbreak prompts is still viable.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-08T13:42:50Z) - Jailbreaking GPT-4V via Self-Adversarial Attacks with System Prompts [64.60375604495883]
We discover a system prompt leakage vulnerability in GPT-4V.
By employing GPT-4 as a red teaming tool against itself, we aim to search for potential jailbreak prompts leveraging stolen system prompts.
We also evaluate the effect of modifying system prompts to defend against jailbreaking attacks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-15T17:17:39Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.