An evidential time-to-event prediction model based on Gaussian random fuzzy numbers

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2406.13487v1
• Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2024 12:14:45 GMT
• Title: An evidential time-to-event prediction model based on Gaussian random fuzzy numbers
• Authors: Ling Huang, Yucheng Xing, Thierry Denoeux, Mengling Feng,
• Abstract summary: We introduce an evidential model for time-to-event prediction with censored data. Uncertainty on event time is quantified by Gaussian random fuzzy numbers.
• Score: 12.753099158148887
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: We introduce an evidential model for time-to-event prediction with censored data. In this model, uncertainty on event time is quantified by Gaussian random fuzzy numbers, a newly introduced family of random fuzzy subsets of the real line with associated belief functions, generalizing both Gaussian random variables and Gaussian possibility distributions. Our approach makes minimal assumptions about the underlying time-to-event distribution. The model is fit by minimizing a generalized negative log-likelihood function that accounts for both normal and censored data. Comparative experiments on two real-world datasets demonstrate the very good performance of our model as compared to the state-of-the-art.

Related papers

• Evidential time-to-event prediction model with well-calibrated uncertainty estimation [12.446406577462069]
  We introduce an evidential regression model designed especially for time-to-event prediction tasks. The most plausible event time is directly quantified by aggregated Gaussian random fuzzy numbers (GRFNs) Our model achieves both accurate and reliable performance, outperforming state-of-the-art methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-12T15:06:04Z)
• Theory on Score-Mismatched Diffusion Models and Zero-Shot Conditional Samplers [49.97755400231656]
  We present the first performance guarantee with explicit dimensional general score-mismatched diffusion samplers. We show that score mismatches result in an distributional bias between the target and sampling distributions, proportional to the accumulated mismatch between the target and training distributions. This result can be directly applied to zero-shot conditional samplers for any conditional model, irrespective of measurement noise.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-17T16:42:12Z)
• Revisiting Optimism and Model Complexity in the Wake of Overparameterized Machine Learning [6.278498348219108]
  We revisit model complexity from first principles, by first reinterpreting and then extending the classical statistical concept of (effective) degrees of freedom. We demonstrate the utility of our proposed complexity measures through a mix of conceptual arguments, theory, and experiments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-02T06:09:57Z)
• User-defined Event Sampling and Uncertainty Quantification in Diffusion Models for Physical Dynamical Systems [49.75149094527068]
  We show that diffusion models can be adapted to make predictions and provide uncertainty quantification for chaotic dynamical systems. We develop a probabilistic approximation scheme for the conditional score function which converges to the true distribution as the noise level decreases. We are able to sample conditionally on nonlinear userdefined events at inference time, and matches data statistics even when sampling from the tails of the distribution.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-13T03:42:03Z)
• Robust Gaussian Process Regression with Huber Likelihood [2.7184224088243365]
  We propose a robust process model in the Gaussian process framework with the likelihood of observed data expressed as the Huber probability distribution. The proposed model employs weights based on projection statistics to scale residuals and bound the influence of vertical outliers and bad leverage points on the latent functions estimates.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-19T02:59:33Z)
• Learning from aggregated data with a maximum entropy model [73.63512438583375]
  We show how a new model, similar to a logistic regression, may be learned from aggregated data only by approximating the unobserved feature distribution with a maximum entropy hypothesis. We present empirical evidence on several public datasets that the model learned this way can achieve performances comparable to those of a logistic model trained with the full unaggregated data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-05T09:17:27Z)
• Optimal regularizations for data generation with probabilistic graphical models [0.0]
  Empirically, well-chosen regularization schemes dramatically improve the quality of the inferred models. We consider the particular case of L 2 and L 1 regularizations in the Maximum A Posteriori (MAP) inference of generative pairwise graphical models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-02T14:45:16Z)
• Latent Gaussian Model Boosting [0.0]
  Tree-boosting shows excellent predictive accuracy on many data sets. We obtain increased predictive accuracy compared to existing approaches in both simulated and real-world data experiments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-19T07:36:30Z)
• Improving Uncertainty Calibration via Prior Augmented Data [56.88185136509654]
  Neural networks have proven successful at learning from complex data distributions by acting as universal function approximators. They are often overconfident in their predictions, which leads to inaccurate and miscalibrated probabilistic predictions. We propose a solution by seeking out regions of feature space where the model is unjustifiably overconfident, and conditionally raising the entropy of those predictions towards that of the prior distribution of the labels.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-22T07:02:37Z)
• Good Classifiers are Abundant in the Interpolating Regime [64.72044662855612]
  We develop a methodology to compute precisely the full distribution of test errors among interpolating classifiers. We find that test errors tend to concentrate around a small typical value $varepsilon*$, which deviates substantially from the test error of worst-case interpolating model. Our results show that the usual style of analysis in statistical learning theory may not be fine-grained enough to capture the good generalization performance observed in practice.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-22T21:12:31Z)
• Efficiently Sampling Functions from Gaussian Process Posteriors [76.94808614373609]
  We propose an easy-to-use and general-purpose approach for fast posterior sampling. We demonstrate how decoupled sample paths accurately represent Gaussian process posteriors at a fraction of the usual cost.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-21T14:03:16Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.