Compliance Cards: Computational Artifacts for Automated AI Regulation Compliance

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2406.14758v1
• Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2024 22:07:15 GMT
• Title: Compliance Cards: Computational Artifacts for Automated AI Regulation Compliance
• Authors: Bill Marino, Preslav Aleksandrov, Carwyn Rahman, Yulu Pi, Bill Shen, Rui-jie Yew, Nicholas D. Lane,
• Abstract summary: We introduce a highly automated system for AI Act compliance analysis. First is an interlocking set of computational artifacts that capture compliance-related metadata about both the AI system or model at-large. Second is an automated analysis algorithm that operates across those computational artifacts to render a runtime prediction about whether or not the overall AI system or model complies with the AI Act.
• Score: 10.711968755473388
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: As the artificial intelligence (AI) supply chain grows more complex, AI systems and models are increasingly likely to incorporate externally-sourced ingredients such as datasets and other models. In such cases, determining whether or not an AI system or model complies with the EU AI Act will require gathering compliance-related metadata about both the AI system or model at-large as well as those externally-supplied ingredients. There must then be an analysis that looks across all of this metadata to render a prediction about the compliance of the overall AI system or model. Up until now, this process has not been automated. Thus, it has not been possible to make real-time compliance determinations in scenarios where doing so would be advantageous, such as the iterative workflows of today's AI developers, search and acquisition of AI ingredients on communities like Hugging Face, federated and continuous learning, and more. To address this shortcoming, we introduce a highly automated system for AI Act compliance analysis. This system has two key elements. First is an interlocking set of computational artifacts that capture compliance-related metadata about both: (1) the AI system or model at-large; (2) any constituent ingredients such as datasets and models. Second is an automated analysis algorithm that operates across those computational artifacts to render a run-time prediction about whether or not the overall AI system or model complies with the AI Act. Working together, these elements promise to enhance and accelerate AI Act compliance assessments.

Related papers

• Collaborative AI in Sentiment Analysis: System Architecture, Data Prediction and Deployment Strategies [3.3374611485861116]
  Large language model (LLM) based artificial intelligence technologies have been a game-changer, particularly in sentiment analysis. However, integrating diverse AI models for processing complex multimodal data and the associated high costs of feature extraction presents significant challenges. This study introduces a collaborative AI framework designed to efficiently distribute and resolve tasks across various AI systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-17T06:14:34Z)
• Generative Diffusion-based Contract Design for Efficient AI Twins Migration in Vehicular Embodied AI Networks [55.15079732226397]
  Embodied AI is a rapidly advancing field that bridges the gap between cyberspace and physical space. In VEANET, embodied AI twins act as in-vehicle AI assistants to perform diverse tasks supporting autonomous driving.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-02T02:20:42Z)
• The AI-Native Software Development Lifecycle: A Theoretical and Practical New Methodology [0.0]
  This white paper proposes the emergence of a fully AI-native SDLC. We introduce the V-Bounce model, an adaptation of the traditional V-model that incorporates AI from end to end. This model redefines the role of humans from primary implementers to primarily validators and verifiers with AI acting as an implementation engine.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-06T19:30:49Z)
• Generative AI Agent for Next-Generation MIMO Design: Fundamentals, Challenges, and Vision [76.4345564864002]
  Next-generation multiple input multiple output (MIMO) is expected to be intelligent and scalable. We propose the concept of the generative AI agent, which is capable of generating tailored and specialized contents. We present two compelling case studies that demonstrate the effectiveness of leveraging the generative AI agent for performance analysis.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-13T02:39:36Z)
• Testing autonomous vehicles and AI: perspectives and challenges from cybersecurity, transparency, robustness and fairness [53.91018508439669]
  The study explores the complexities of integrating Artificial Intelligence into Autonomous Vehicles (AVs) It examines the challenges introduced by AI components and the impact on testing procedures. The paper identifies significant challenges and suggests future directions for research and development of AI in AV technology.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-21T08:29:42Z)
• Explainable AI for Safe and Trustworthy Autonomous Driving: A Systematic Review [12.38351931894004]
  We present the first systematic literature review of explainable methods for safe and trustworthy autonomous driving. We identify five key contributions of XAI for safe and trustworthy AI in AD, which are interpretable design, interpretable surrogate models, interpretable monitoring, auxiliary explanations, and interpretable validation. We propose a modular framework called SafeX to integrate these contributions, enabling explanation delivery to users while simultaneously ensuring the safety of AI models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-08T09:08:44Z)
• Cloud-based XAI Services for Assessing Open Repository Models Under Adversarial Attacks [7.500941533148728]
  We propose a cloud-based service framework that encapsulates computing components and assessment tasks into pipelines. We demonstrate the application of XAI services for assessing five quality attributes of AI models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-22T00:37:01Z)
• Towards a Responsible AI Metrics Catalogue: A Collection of Metrics for AI Accountability [28.67753149592534]
  This study bridges the accountability gap by introducing our effort towards a comprehensive metrics catalogue. Our catalogue delineates process metrics that underpin procedural integrity, resource metrics that provide necessary tools and frameworks, and product metrics that reflect the outputs of AI systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-22T04:43:16Z)
• Cybertrust: From Explainable to Actionable and Interpretable AI (AI2) [58.981120701284816]
  Actionable and Interpretable AI (AI2) will incorporate explicit quantifications and visualizations of user confidence in AI recommendations. It will allow examining and testing of AI system predictions to establish a basis for trust in the systems' decision making.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-26T18:53:09Z)
• Data-Driven and SE-assisted AI Model Signal-Awareness Enhancement and Introspection [61.571331422347875]
  We propose a data-driven approach to enhance models' signal-awareness. We combine the SE concept of code complexity with the AI technique of curriculum learning. We achieve up to 4.8x improvement in model signal awareness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-10T17:58:18Z)
• Towards an Interface Description Template for AI-enabled Systems [77.34726150561087]
  Reuse is a common system architecture approach that seeks to instantiate a system architecture with existing components. There is currently no framework that guides the selection of necessary information to assess their portability to operate in a system different than the one for which the component was originally purposed. We present ongoing work on establishing an interface description template that captures the main information of an AI-enabled component.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-13T20:30:26Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.