Conventional Quantum Theory Does Not Support A Coherent Relational Account
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2406.17290v1
- Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2024 05:35:32 GMT
- Title: Conventional Quantum Theory Does Not Support A Coherent Relational Account
- Authors: R. E. Kastner,
- Abstract summary: I review a counterexample to the frequent claim that discrepancies among observers from conventional quantum theory's inability to define "measurement"
I consider the implications for a recent experiment arising from such inconsistencies and conclude it is not successful.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: I review a counterexample to the frequent claim that discrepancies among observers resulting from conventional quantum theory's inability to define "measurement", such as those arising in the Wigner's Friend thought experiment, remain private and incommensurable. I consider the implications for a recent attempt to shield Relational Quantum Mechanics from such inconsistencies and conclude that it is not successful.
Related papers
- Measuring the Evolution of Entanglement in Compton Scattering [101.11630543545151]
The behavior of quantum entanglement during scattering is identical to the behavior of initially classically correlated photons up to a constant factor equal to two.
Our dedicated experiment with photons confirms these results and explains the "Puzzle of Decoherence" observed recently.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-20T14:21:23Z) - Relational Quantum Mechanics is Still Incompatible with Quantum Mechanics [0.0]
We show that a central concept in Quantum Mechanics, are inconsistent with Quantum Mechanics.
Our work has been criticized by Cavalcanti, Di Biagio, Rovelli (CDR)
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-27T09:34:17Z) - Bertlmann's socks from a Viennese perspective [0.0]
A century after its inception, we are presented with a promising interpretive key, intimated by Wheeler as early as 1974.
The interpretative paradoxes of this theory might be resolved if we discern the relationship between logical undecidability and quantum undecidability.
It will be demonstrated how both are intricately linked to an observer/observed relational issue, and how the idiosyncratic behaviours of quantum physics can be reconciled with the normative.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-08-07T06:49:19Z) - Measurement incompatibility is strictly stronger than disturbance [44.99833362998488]
Heisenberg argued that measurements irreversibly alter the state of the system on which they are acting, causing an irreducible disturbance on subsequent measurements.
This article shows that measurement incompatibility is indeed a sufficient condition for irreversibility of measurement disturbance.
However, we exhibit a toy theory, termed the minimal classical theory (MCT), that is a counterexample for the converse implication.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-26T13:47:00Z) - Incompatibility of observables, channels and instruments in information
theories [68.8204255655161]
We study the notion of compatibility for tests of an operational probabilistic theory.
We show that a theory admits of incompatible tests if and only if some information cannot be extracted without disturbance.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-04-17T08:44:29Z) - Events in quantum mechanics are maximally non-absolute [0.9176056742068814]
We prove that quantum correlations can be maximally non-absolute according to both quantifiers.
We show that chained Bell inequalities (and relaxations thereof) are also valid constraints for Wigner's experiment.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-12-19T21:15:16Z) - Quantum indistinguishability through exchangeable desirable gambles [69.62715388742298]
Two particles are identical if all their intrinsic properties, such as spin and charge, are the same.
Quantum mechanics is seen as a normative and algorithmic theory guiding an agent to assess her subjective beliefs represented as (coherent) sets of gambles.
We show how sets of exchangeable observables (gambles) may be updated after a measurement and discuss the issue of defining entanglement for indistinguishable particle systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-05-10T13:11:59Z) - Unitary Interactions Do Not Yield Outcomes: Attempting to Model
"Wigner's Friend" [0.0]
An experiment by Proietti it et al purporting to instantiate the Wigner's Friend' thought experiment is discussed.
It is pointed out that the stated implications of the experiment regarding the alleged irreconcilability of facts attributed to different observers warrant critical review.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-05-04T21:38:41Z) - Observers of quantum systems cannot agree to disagree [55.41644538483948]
We ask whether agreement between observers can serve as a physical principle that must hold for any theory of the world.
We construct examples of (postquantum) no-signaling boxes where observers can agree to disagree.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-02-17T19:00:04Z) - Quantum Mechanical description of Bell's experiment assumes Locality [91.3755431537592]
Bell's experiment description assumes the (Quantum Mechanics-language equivalent of the classical) condition of Locality.
This result is complementary to a recently published one demonstrating that non-Locality is necessary to describe said experiment.
It is concluded that, within the framework of Quantum Mechanics, there is absolutely no reason to believe in the existence of non-Local effects.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-02-27T15:04:08Z) - Unitary-Only Quantum Theory Cannot Consistently Describe the Use of
Itself: On the Frauchiger-Renner Paradox [0.0]
The Frauchiger-Renner Paradox is an extension of paradoxes based on the 'Problem of Measurement,' such as Schrodinger's Cat and Wigner's Friend.
This paper discusses a basic inconsistency arising in the FR scenario at a much earlier point than the derived contradiction.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-02-04T18:34:20Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.