A Survey of Retrieval Algorithms in Ad and Content Recommendation Systems

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2407.01712v2
• Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2024 04:16:03 GMT
• Title: A Survey of Retrieval Algorithms in Ad and Content Recommendation Systems
• Authors: Yu Zhao, Fang Liu,
• Abstract summary: This survey examines the most effective retrieval algorithms utilized in ad recommendation and content recommendation systems. Ad targeting algorithms rely on detailed user profiles and behavioral data to deliver personalized advertisements. organic retrieval systems aim to improve user experience by recommending content that matches user preferences.
• Score: 5.017244805491932
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: This survey examines the most effective retrieval algorithms utilized in ad recommendation and content recommendation systems. Ad targeting algorithms rely on detailed user profiles and behavioral data to deliver personalized advertisements, thereby driving revenue through targeted placements. Conversely, organic retrieval systems aim to improve user experience by recommending content that matches user preferences. This paper compares these two applications and explains the most effective methods employed in each.

Related papers

• Enhancing CTR Prediction in Recommendation Domain with Search Query Representation [31.86615693808628]
  We propose a framework that learns from user search query embeddings within the context of user preferences in the recommendation domain. Specifically, user search query sequences from the search domain are used to predict the items users will click at the next time point in the recommendation domain.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-28T19:52:09Z)
• Quantifying User Coherence: A Unified Framework for Cross-Domain Recommendation Analysis [69.37718774071793]
  This paper introduces novel information-theoretic measures for understanding recommender systems. We evaluate 7 recommendation algorithms across 9 datasets, revealing the relationships between our measures and standard performance metrics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-03T13:02:07Z)
• A Comprehensive Survey on Retrieval Methods in Recommender Systems [32.1847120460637]
  This survey explores the critical yet often overlooked retrieval stage of recommender systems. To achieve precise and efficient personalized retrieval, we summarize existing work in three key areas. We highlight current industrial applications through a case study on retrieval practices at a specific company.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-11T07:09:59Z)
• How to Diversify any Personalized Recommender? A User-centric Pre-processing approach [0.0]
  We introduce a novel approach to improve the diversity of Top-N recommendations while maintaining recommendation performance. Our approach employs a user-centric pre-processing strategy aimed at exposing users to a wide array of content categories and topics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-03T15:02:55Z)
• Advancing Recommender Systems by mitigating Shilling attacks [0.0]
  Collaborative filtering is a widely used method for computing recommendations due to its good performance. This paper proposes an algorithm to detect such shilling profiles in the system accurately and also study the effects of such profiles on the recommendations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-24T20:05:39Z)
• Breaking Feedback Loops in Recommender Systems with Causal Inference [99.22185950608838]
  Recent work has shown that feedback loops may compromise recommendation quality and homogenize user behavior. We propose the Causal Adjustment for Feedback Loops (CAFL), an algorithm that provably breaks feedback loops using causal inference. We show that CAFL improves recommendation quality when compared to prior correction methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-04T17:58:39Z)
• Two-Stage Neural Contextual Bandits for Personalised News Recommendation [50.3750507789989]
  Existing personalised news recommendation methods focus on exploiting user interests and ignores exploration in recommendation. We build on contextual bandits recommendation strategies which naturally address the exploitation-exploration trade-off. We use deep learning representations for users and news, and generalise the neural upper confidence bound (UCB) policies to generalised additive UCB and bilinear UCB.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-26T12:07:56Z)
• Exploring Customer Price Preference and Product Profit Role in Recommender Systems [0.4724825031148411]
  We show the impact of manipulating profit awareness of a recommender system. We propose an adjustment of a predicted ranking for score-based recommender systems. In the experiments, we show the ability to improve both the precision and the generated recommendations' profit.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-13T12:08:06Z)
• Deep Learning feature selection to unhide demographic recommender systems factors [63.732639864601914]
  The matrix factorization model generates factors which do not incorporate semantic knowledge. DeepUnHide is able to extract demographic information from the users and items factors in collaborative filtering recommender systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-17T17:36:48Z)
• Fairness-Aware Explainable Recommendation over Knowledge Graphs [73.81994676695346]
  We analyze different groups of users according to their level of activity, and find that bias exists in recommendation performance between different groups. We show that inactive users may be more susceptible to receiving unsatisfactory recommendations, due to insufficient training data for the inactive users. We propose a fairness constrained approach via re-ranking to mitigate this problem in the context of explainable recommendation over knowledge graphs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-03T05:04:38Z)
• A Survey on Knowledge Graph-Based Recommender Systems [65.50486149662564]
  We conduct a systematical survey of knowledge graph-based recommender systems. We focus on how the papers utilize the knowledge graph for accurate and explainable recommendation. We introduce datasets used in these works.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-28T02:26:30Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.