Towards Socially and Environmentally Responsible AI

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2407.05176v1
• Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2024 00:41:41 GMT
• Title: Towards Socially and Environmentally Responsible AI
• Authors: Pengfei Li, Yejia Liu, Jianyi Yang, Shaolei Ren,
• Abstract summary: In this paper, we propose equitable geographical load balancing (GLB) to fairly balance AI's regional social and environmental costs. Our empirical results demonstrate that while the existing GLB algorithms result in disproportionately large social and environmental costs in certain regions, our proposed equitable GLB can fairly balance AI's negative social and environmental costs across all the regions.
• Score: 33.398841227207264
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
• Abstract: The sharply increasing sizes of artificial intelligence (AI) models come with significant energy consumption and environmental footprints, which can disproportionately impact certain (often marginalized) regions and hence create environmental inequity concerns. Moreover, concerns with social inequity have also emerged, as AI computing resources may not be equitably distributed across the globe and users from certain disadvantaged regions with severe resource constraints can consistently experience inferior model performance. Importantly, the inequity concerns that encompass both social and environmental dimensions still remain unexplored and have increasingly hindered responsible AI. In this paper, we leverage the spatial flexibility of AI inference workloads and propose equitable geographical load balancing (GLB) to fairly balance AI's regional social and environmental costs. Concretely, to penalize the disproportionately high social and environmental costs for equity, we introduce $L_q$ norms as novel regularization terms into the optimization objective for GLB decisions. Our empirical results based on real-world AI inference traces demonstrate that while the existing GLB algorithms result in disproportionately large social and environmental costs in certain regions, our proposed equitable GLB can fairly balance AI's negative social and environmental costs across all the regions.

Related papers

• From Efficiency Gains to Rebound Effects: The Problem of Jevons' Paradox in AI's Polarized Environmental Debate [69.05573887799203]
  Much of this debate has concentrated on direct impact without addressing the significant indirect effects. This paper examines how the problem of Jevons' Paradox applies to AI, whereby efficiency gains may paradoxically spur increased consumption. We argue that understanding these second-order impacts requires an interdisciplinary approach, combining lifecycle assessments with socio-economic analyses.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-27T22:45:06Z)
• Exploring the sustainable scaling of AI dilemma: A projective study of corporations' AI environmental impacts [0.0]
  We propose a methodology to estimate the environmental impact of a company's AI portfolio. Results confirm that large generative AI models consume up to 4600x more energy than traditional models. Mitigating the environmental impact of Generative AI by 2030 requires coordinated efforts across the AI value chain.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-24T08:58:49Z)
• Towards Environmentally Equitable AI [23.332350246411124]
  We advocate environmental equity as a priority for the management of future AI systems. We uncover the potential of equity-aware geographical load balancing to fairly re-distribute the environmental cost across different regions. We conclude by discussing a few future directions to exploit the full potential of system management approaches to mitigate AI's environmental inequity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-21T08:46:19Z)
• The Impossibility of Fair LLMs [59.424918263776284]
  The need for fair AI is increasingly clear in the era of large language models (LLMs) We review the technical frameworks that machine learning researchers have used to evaluate fairness. We develop guidelines for the more realistic goal of achieving fairness in particular use cases.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-28T04:36:15Z)
• Towards Environmentally Equitable AI via Geographical Load Balancing [40.142341503145275]
  This paper takes a first step toward addressing AI's environmental inequity by balancing its regional negative environmental impact. We run trace-based simulations by considering a set of 10 geographically-distributed data centers that serve inference requests for a large language AI model. The results demonstrate that existing GLB approaches may amplify environmental inequity while our proposed equity-aware GLB can significantly reduce the regional disparity in terms of carbon and water footprints.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-20T17:13:33Z)
• Fairness in AI and Its Long-Term Implications on Society [68.8204255655161]
  We take a closer look at AI fairness and analyze how lack of AI fairness can lead to deepening of biases over time. We discuss how biased models can lead to more negative real-world outcomes for certain groups. If the issues persist, they could be reinforced by interactions with other risks and have severe implications on society in the form of social unrest.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-16T11:22:59Z)
• Towards Sustainable Artificial Intelligence: An Overview of Environmental Protection Uses and Issues [0.0]
  This paper describes the paradox of an energy-consuming technology serving the ecological challenges of tomorrow. It draws on numerous examples from AI for Green players to present use cases and concrete examples. The environmental dimension is part of the broader ethical problem of AI, and addressing it is crucial for ensuring the sustainability of AI in the long term.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-22T14:31:48Z)
• Building a Foundation for Data-Driven, Interpretable, and Robust Policy Design using the AI Economist [67.08543240320756]
  We show that the AI Economist framework enables effective, flexible, and interpretable policy design using two-level reinforcement learning and data-driven simulations. We find that log-linear policies trained using RL significantly improve social welfare, based on both public health and economic outcomes, compared to past outcomes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-08-06T01:30:41Z)
• AI in the "Real World": Examining the Impact of AI Deployment in Low-Resource Contexts [1.90365714903665]
  This paper examines the deployment of AI by large industry labs situated in low-resource contexts. It highlights factors impacting unanticipated deployments, and reflects on the state of AI deployment within the Global South.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-28T01:49:24Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.