Towards Environmentally Equitable AI via Geographical Load Balancing

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2307.05494v2
• Date: Thu, 2 May 2024 06:10:54 GMT
• Title: Towards Environmentally Equitable AI via Geographical Load Balancing
• Authors: Pengfei Li, Jianyi Yang, Adam Wierman, Shaolei Ren,
• Abstract summary: This paper takes a first step toward addressing AI's environmental inequity by balancing its regional negative environmental impact. We run trace-based simulations by considering a set of 10 geographically-distributed data centers that serve inference requests for a large language AI model. The results demonstrate that existing GLB approaches may amplify environmental inequity while our proposed equity-aware GLB can significantly reduce the regional disparity in terms of carbon and water footprints.
• Score: 40.142341503145275
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Fueled by the soaring popularity of large language and foundation models, the accelerated growth of artificial intelligence (AI) models' enormous environmental footprint has come under increased scrutiny. While many approaches have been proposed to make AI more energy-efficient and environmentally friendly, environmental inequity -- the fact that AI's environmental footprint can be disproportionately higher in certain regions than in others -- has emerged, raising social-ecological justice concerns. This paper takes a first step toward addressing AI's environmental inequity by balancing its regional negative environmental impact. Concretely, we focus on the carbon and water footprints of AI model inference and propose equity-aware geographical load balancing (GLB) to explicitly address AI's environmental impacts on the most disadvantaged regions. We run trace-based simulations by considering a set of 10 geographically-distributed data centers that serve inference requests for a large language AI model. The results demonstrate that existing GLB approaches may amplify environmental inequity while our proposed equity-aware GLB can significantly reduce the regional disparity in terms of carbon and water footprints.

Related papers

• Hype, Sustainability, and the Price of the Bigger-is-Better Paradigm in AI [67.58673784790375]
  We argue that the 'bigger is better' AI paradigm is not only fragile scientifically, but comes with undesirable consequences. First, it is not sustainable, as its compute demands increase faster than model performance, leading to unreasonable economic requirements and a disproportionate environmental footprint. Second, it implies focusing on certain problems at the expense of others, leaving aside important applications, e.g. health, education, or the climate.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-21T14:43:54Z)
• Towards A Comprehensive Assessment of AI's Environmental Impact [0.5982922468400899]
  Recent surge of interest in machine learning has sparked a trend towards large-scale adoption of AI/ML. There is a need for a framework that monitors the environmental impact and degradation from AI/ML throughout its lifecycle. This study proposes a methodology to track environmental variables relating to the multifaceted impact of AI around datacenters using openly available energy data and globally acquired satellite observations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-22T21:19:35Z)
• Generative AI for Low-Carbon Artificial Intelligence of Things with Large Language Models [67.0243099823109]
  Generative AI (GAI) holds immense potential to reduce carbon emissions of Artificial Intelligence of Things (AIoT) In this article, we explore the potential of GAI for carbon emissions reduction and propose a novel GAI-enabled solution for low-carbon AIoT. We propose a Large Language Model (LLM)-enabled carbon emission optimization framework, in which we design pluggable LLM and Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG) modules.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-28T05:46:28Z)
• Towards Socially and Environmentally Responsible AI [33.398841227207264]
  In this paper, we propose equitable geographical load balancing (GLB) to fairly balance AI's regional social and environmental costs. Our empirical results demonstrate that while the existing GLB algorithms result in disproportionately large social and environmental costs in certain regions, our proposed equitable GLB can fairly balance AI's negative social and environmental costs across all the regions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-23T00:41:41Z)
• Recommendations for public action towards sustainable generative AI systems [0.0]
  This paper presents the components of the environmental footprint of generative AI. It highlights the massive CO2 emissions and water consumption associated with training large language models. The paper also explores the factors and characteristics of models that have an influence on their environmental footprint.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-04T08:55:53Z)
• On the Opportunities of Green Computing: A Survey [80.21955522431168]
  Artificial Intelligence (AI) has achieved significant advancements in technology and research with the development over several decades. The needs for high computing power brings higher carbon emission and undermines research fairness. To tackle the challenges of computing resources and environmental impact of AI, Green Computing has become a hot research topic.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-01T11:16:41Z)
• A Comparative Study of Machine Learning Algorithms for Anomaly Detection in Industrial Environments: Performance and Environmental Impact [62.997667081978825]
  This study seeks to address the demands of high-performance machine learning models with environmental sustainability. Traditional machine learning algorithms, such as Decision Trees and Random Forests, demonstrate robust efficiency and performance. However, superior outcomes were obtained with optimised configurations, albeit with a commensurate increase in resource consumption.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-01T15:18:00Z)
• Towards Sustainable Artificial Intelligence: An Overview of Environmental Protection Uses and Issues [0.0]
  This paper describes the paradox of an energy-consuming technology serving the ecological challenges of tomorrow. It draws on numerous examples from AI for Green players to present use cases and concrete examples. The environmental dimension is part of the broader ethical problem of AI, and addressing it is crucial for ensuring the sustainability of AI in the long term.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-22T14:31:48Z)
• Eco2AI: carbon emissions tracking of machine learning models as the first step towards sustainable AI [47.130004596434816]
  In eco2AI we put emphasis on accuracy of energy consumption tracking and correct regional CO2 emissions accounting. The motivation also comes from the concept of AI-based green house gases sequestrating cycle with both Sustainable AI and Green AI pathways.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-31T09:34:53Z)
• Unraveling the hidden environmental impacts of AI solutions for environment [0.04588028371034406]
  In the past ten years artificial intelligence has encountered such dramatic progress that it is seen now as a tool of choice to solve environmental issues. The deep learning community began to realize that training models with more and more parameters required a lot of energy and as a consequence GHG emissions. This article proposes to study the possible negative impact of "AI for green"
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-22T14:56:47Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.