The Misclassification Likelihood Matrix: Some Classes Are More Likely To Be Misclassified Than Others

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2407.07818v1
• Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2024 16:43:14 GMT
• Title: The Misclassification Likelihood Matrix: Some Classes Are More Likely To Be Misclassified Than Others
• Authors: Daniel Sikar, Artur Garcez, Robin Bloomfield, Tillman Weyde, Kaleem Peeroo, Naman Singh, Maeve Hutchinson, Mirela Reljan-Delaney,
• Abstract summary: This study introduces Misclassification Likelihood Matrix (MLM) as a novel tool for quantifying the reliability of neural network predictions under distribution shifts. The implications of this work extend beyond image classification, with ongoing applications in autonomous systems, such as self-driving cars.
• Score: 1.716489422472551
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: This study introduces the Misclassification Likelihood Matrix (MLM) as a novel tool for quantifying the reliability of neural network predictions under distribution shifts. The MLM is obtained by leveraging softmax outputs and clustering techniques to measure the distances between the predictions of a trained neural network and class centroids. By analyzing these distances, the MLM provides a comprehensive view of the model's misclassification tendencies, enabling decision-makers to identify the most common and critical sources of errors. The MLM allows for the prioritization of model improvements and the establishment of decision thresholds based on acceptable risk levels. The approach is evaluated on the MNIST dataset using a Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) and a perturbed version of the dataset to simulate distribution shifts. The results demonstrate the effectiveness of the MLM in assessing the reliability of predictions and highlight its potential in enhancing the interpretability and risk mitigation capabilities of neural networks. The implications of this work extend beyond image classification, with ongoing applications in autonomous systems, such as self-driving cars, to improve the safety and reliability of decision-making in complex, real-world environments.

Related papers

• Cycles of Thought: Measuring LLM Confidence through Stable Explanations [53.15438489398938]
  Large language models (LLMs) can reach and even surpass human-level accuracy on a variety of benchmarks, but their overconfidence in incorrect responses is still a well-documented failure mode. We propose a framework for measuring an LLM's uncertainty with respect to the distribution of generated explanations for an answer.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-05T16:35:30Z)
• Chain-of-Thought Prompting for Demographic Inference with Large Multimodal Models [58.58594658683919]
  Large multimodal models (LMMs) have shown transformative potential across various research tasks. Our findings indicate LMMs possess advantages in zero-shot learning, interpretability, and handling uncurated 'in-the-wild' inputs. We propose a Chain-of-Thought augmented prompting approach, which effectively mitigates the off-target prediction issue.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-24T16:26:56Z)
• Practical Probabilistic Model-based Deep Reinforcement Learning by Integrating Dropout Uncertainty and Trajectory Sampling [7.179313063022576]
  This paper addresses the prediction stability, prediction accuracy and control capability of the current probabilistic model-based reinforcement learning (MBRL) built on neural networks. A novel approach dropout-based probabilistic ensembles with trajectory sampling (DPETS) is proposed.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-20T06:39:19Z)
• Conditional Mutual Information Constrained Deep Learning for Classification [3.5237980787861964]
  conditional mutual information (CMI) and normalized conditional mutual information (NCMI) are introduced to measure the concentration and performance of a classification deep neural network (DNN) By using NCMI to evaluate popular DNNs pretrained over ImageNet in the literature, it is shown that their validation accuracies over ImageNet validation data set are more or less inversely proportional to their NCMI values. A novel alternating learning algorithm is proposed to solve such a constrained optimization problem.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-17T01:16:45Z)
• Probabilistic MIMO U-Net: Efficient and Accurate Uncertainty Estimation for Pixel-wise Regression [1.4528189330418977]
  Uncertainty estimation in machine learning is paramount for enhancing the reliability and interpretability of predictive models. We present an adaptation of the Multiple-Input Multiple-Output (MIMO) framework for pixel-wise regression tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-14T22:08:28Z)
• Dynamic Model Agnostic Reliability Evaluation of Machine-Learning Methods Integrated in Instrumentation & Control Systems [1.8978726202765634]
  Trustworthiness of datadriven neural network-based machine learning algorithms is not adequately assessed. In recent reports by the National Institute for Standards and Technology, trustworthiness in ML is a critical barrier to adoption. We demonstrate a real-time model-agnostic method to evaluate the relative reliability of ML predictions by incorporating out-of-distribution detection on the training dataset.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-08T18:25:42Z)
• Uncertainty Estimation by Fisher Information-based Evidential Deep Learning [61.94125052118442]
  Uncertainty estimation is a key factor that makes deep learning reliable in practical applications. We propose a novel method, Fisher Information-based Evidential Deep Learning ($mathcalI$-EDL) In particular, we introduce Fisher Information Matrix (FIM) to measure the informativeness of evidence carried by each sample, according to which we can dynamically reweight the objective loss terms to make the network more focused on the representation learning of uncertain classes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-03T16:12:59Z)
• RoMA: a Method for Neural Network Robustness Measurement and Assessment [0.0]
  We present a new statistical method, called Robustness Measurement and Assessment (RoMA) RoMA determines the probability that a random input perturbation might cause misclassification. One interesting insight obtained through this work is that, in a classification network, different output labels can exhibit very different robustness levels.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-21T12:01:54Z)
• An Uncertainty-based Human-in-the-loop System for Industrial Tool Wear Analysis [68.8204255655161]
  We show that uncertainty measures based on Monte-Carlo dropout in the context of a human-in-the-loop system increase the system's transparency and performance. A simulation study demonstrates that the uncertainty-based human-in-the-loop system increases performance for different levels of human involvement.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-14T15:47:37Z)
• Unlabelled Data Improves Bayesian Uncertainty Calibration under Covariate Shift [100.52588638477862]
  We develop an approximate Bayesian inference scheme based on posterior regularisation. We demonstrate the utility of our method in the context of transferring prognostic models of prostate cancer across globally diverse populations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-26T13:50:19Z)
• Diversity inducing Information Bottleneck in Model Ensembles [73.80615604822435]
  In this paper, we target the problem of generating effective ensembles of neural networks by encouraging diversity in prediction. We explicitly optimize a diversity inducing adversarial loss for learning latent variables and thereby obtain diversity in the output predictions necessary for modeling multi-modal data. Compared to the most competitive baselines, we show significant improvements in classification accuracy, under a shift in the data distribution.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-03-10T03:10:41Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.