SLIP: Securing LLMs IP Using Weights Decomposition
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2407.10886v1
- Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2024 16:37:55 GMT
- Title: SLIP: Securing LLMs IP Using Weights Decomposition
- Authors: Yehonathan Refael, Adam Hakim, Lev Greenberg, Tal Aviv, Satya Lokam, Ben Fishman, Shachar Seidman,
- Abstract summary: Large language models (LLMs) have recently seen widespread adoption, in both academia and industry.
As these models grow, they become valuable intellectual property (IP), reflecting enormous investments by their owners.
Current methods to protect models' IP on the edge have limitations in terms of practicality, loss in accuracy, or suitability to requirements.
We introduce a novel hybrid inference algorithm, named SLIP, designed to protect edge-deployed models from theft.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) have recently seen widespread adoption, in both academia and industry. As these models grow, they become valuable intellectual property (IP), reflecting enormous investments by their owners. Moreover, the high cost of cloud-based deployment has driven interest towards deployment to edge devices, yet this risks exposing valuable parameters to theft and unauthorized use. Current methods to protect models' IP on the edge have limitations in terms of practicality, loss in accuracy, or suitability to requirements. In this paper, we introduce a novel hybrid inference algorithm, named SLIP, designed to protect edge-deployed models from theft. SLIP is the first hybrid protocol that is both practical for real-world applications and provably secure, while having zero accuracy degradation and minimal impact on latency. It involves partitioning the model between two computing resources, one secure but expensive, and another cost-effective but vulnerable. This is achieved through matrix decomposition, ensuring that the secure resource retains a maximally sensitive portion of the model's IP while performing a minimal amount of computations, and vice versa for the vulnerable resource. Importantly, the protocol includes security guarantees that prevent attackers from exploiting the partition to infer the secured information. Finally, we present experimental results that show the robustness and effectiveness of our method, positioning it as a compelling solution for protecting LLMs.
Related papers
- PriRoAgg: Achieving Robust Model Aggregation with Minimum Privacy Leakage for Federated Learning [49.916365792036636]
Federated learning (FL) has recently gained significant momentum due to its potential to leverage large-scale distributed user data.
The transmitted model updates can potentially leak sensitive user information, and the lack of central control of the local training process leaves the global model susceptible to malicious manipulations on model updates.
We develop a general framework PriRoAgg, utilizing Lagrange coded computing and distributed zero-knowledge proof, to execute a wide range of robust aggregation algorithms while satisfying aggregated privacy.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-12T03:18:08Z) - Defensive Prompt Patch: A Robust and Interpretable Defense of LLMs against Jailbreak Attacks [59.46556573924901]
This paper introduces Defensive Prompt Patch (DPP), a novel prompt-based defense mechanism for large language models (LLMs)
Unlike previous approaches, DPP is designed to achieve a minimal Attack Success Rate (ASR) while preserving the high utility of LLMs.
Empirical results conducted on LLAMA-2-7B-Chat and Mistral-7B-Instruct-v0.2 models demonstrate the robustness and adaptability of DPP.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-30T14:40:35Z) - Advancing the Robustness of Large Language Models through Self-Denoised Smoothing [50.54276872204319]
Large language models (LLMs) have achieved significant success, but their vulnerability to adversarial perturbations has raised considerable concerns.
We propose to leverage the multitasking nature of LLMs to first denoise the noisy inputs and then to make predictions based on these denoised versions.
Unlike previous denoised smoothing techniques in computer vision, which require training a separate model to enhance the robustness of LLMs, our method offers significantly better efficiency and flexibility.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-18T15:47:00Z) - RigorLLM: Resilient Guardrails for Large Language Models against Undesired Content [62.685566387625975]
Current mitigation strategies, while effective, are not resilient under adversarial attacks.
This paper introduces Resilient Guardrails for Large Language Models (RigorLLM), a novel framework designed to efficiently moderate harmful and unsafe inputs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-19T07:25:02Z) - MAP: MAsk-Pruning for Source-Free Model Intellectual Property Protection [18.99205251538783]
MAsk Pruning (MAP) is a framework for locating and pruning target-related parameters in a well-trained model.
MAP freezes the source model and learns a target-specific binary mask to prevent unauthorized data usage.
Extensive experiments indicate that MAP yields new state-of-the-art performance.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-07T02:10:59Z) - Privacy-Preserving Distributed Learning for Residential Short-Term Load
Forecasting [11.185176107646956]
Power system load data can inadvertently reveal the daily routines of residential users, posing a risk to their property security.
We introduce a Markovian Switching-based distributed training framework, the convergence of which is substantiated through rigorous theoretical analysis.
Case studies employing real-world power system load data validate the efficacy of our proposed algorithm.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-02T16:39:08Z) - EncryIP: A Practical Encryption-Based Framework for Model Intellectual
Property Protection [17.655627250882805]
This paper introduces a practical encryption-based framework called textitEncryIP.
It seamlessly integrates a public-key encryption scheme into the model learning process.
It demonstrates superior effectiveness in both training protected models and efficiently detecting the unauthorized spread of ML models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-12-19T11:11:03Z) - MirrorNet: A TEE-Friendly Framework for Secure On-device DNN Inference [14.08010398777227]
Deep neural network (DNN) models have become prevalent in edge devices for real-time inference.
Existing defense approaches fail to fully safeguard model confidentiality or result in significant latency issues.
This paper presents MirrorNet, which generates a TEE-friendly implementation for any given DNN model to protect the model confidentiality.
For the evaluation, MirrorNet can achieve a 18.6% accuracy gap between authenticated and illegal use, while only introducing 0.99% hardware overhead.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-16T01:21:19Z) - Private, Efficient, and Accurate: Protecting Models Trained by
Multi-party Learning with Differential Privacy [8.8480262507008]
We propose PEA (Private, Efficient, Accurate), which consists of a secure DPSGD protocol and two optimization methods.
We implement PEA in two open-source MPL frameworks: TF-Encrypted and Queqiao.
Experiments show that PEA can train a differentially private classification model with an accuracy of 88% for CIFAR-10 within 7 minutes under the LAN setting.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-08-18T06:48:25Z) - Is Vertical Logistic Regression Privacy-Preserving? A Comprehensive
Privacy Analysis and Beyond [57.10914865054868]
We consider vertical logistic regression (VLR) trained with mini-batch descent gradient.
We provide a comprehensive and rigorous privacy analysis of VLR in a class of open-source Federated Learning frameworks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-07-19T05:47:30Z) - RelaxLoss: Defending Membership Inference Attacks without Losing Utility [68.48117818874155]
We propose a novel training framework based on a relaxed loss with a more achievable learning target.
RelaxLoss is applicable to any classification model with added benefits of easy implementation and negligible overhead.
Our approach consistently outperforms state-of-the-art defense mechanisms in terms of resilience against MIAs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-07-12T19:34:47Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.