Theoretical Insights into CycleGAN: Analyzing Approximation and Estimation Errors in Unpaired Data Generation

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2407.11678v1
• Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2024 12:53:53 GMT
• Title: Theoretical Insights into CycleGAN: Analyzing Approximation and Estimation Errors in Unpaired Data Generation
• Authors: Luwei Sun, Dongrui Shen, Han Feng,
• Abstract summary: We focus on analyzing the excess risk of the unpaired data generation model, called CycleGAN. Unlike classical GANs, CycleGAN not only transforms data between two unpaired distributions but also ensures the mappings are consistent. By considering the impact of both the model architecture and training procedure, the risk is decomposed into two terms: approximation error and estimation error.
• Score: 0.5735035463793009
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: In this paper, we focus on analyzing the excess risk of the unpaired data generation model, called CycleGAN. Unlike classical GANs, CycleGAN not only transforms data between two unpaired distributions but also ensures the mappings are consistent, which is encouraged by the cycle-consistency term unique to CycleGAN. The increasing complexity of model structure and the addition of the cycle-consistency term in CycleGAN present new challenges for error analysis. By considering the impact of both the model architecture and training procedure, the risk is decomposed into two terms: approximation error and estimation error. These two error terms are analyzed separately and ultimately combined by considering the trade-off between them. Each component is rigorously analyzed; the approximation error through constructing approximations of the optimal transport maps, and the estimation error through establishing an upper bound using Rademacher complexity. Our analysis not only isolates these errors but also explores the trade-offs between them, which provides a theoretical insights of how CycleGAN's architecture and training procedures influence its performance.

Related papers

• MissNODAG: Differentiable Cyclic Causal Graph Learning from Incomplete Data [13.006241141102]
  We propose MissNODAG, a framework for learning the underlying cyclic causal graph and the missingness mechanism from partially observed data. Our framework integrates an additive noise model with an expectation-maximization procedure, alternating between imputing missing values and optimizing the observed data likelihood. We demonstrate the effectiveness of MissNODAG through synthetic experiments and an application to real-world gene perturbation data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-24T17:09:10Z)
• Induced Covariance for Causal Discovery in Linear Sparse Structures [55.2480439325792]
  Causal models seek to unravel the cause-effect relationships among variables from observed data. This paper introduces a novel causal discovery algorithm designed for settings in which variables exhibit linearly sparse relationships.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-02T04:01:38Z)
• Structured Radial Basis Function Network: Modelling Diversity for Multiple Hypotheses Prediction [51.82628081279621]
  Multi-modal regression is important in forecasting nonstationary processes or with a complex mixture of distributions. A Structured Radial Basis Function Network is presented as an ensemble of multiple hypotheses predictors for regression problems. It is proved that this structured model can efficiently interpolate this tessellation and approximate the multiple hypotheses target distribution.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-02T01:27:53Z)
• Characterization and Greedy Learning of Gaussian Structural Causal Models under Unknown Interventions [3.441021278275805]
  We consider the problem of recovering the causal structure underlying observations when the targets of the interventions in each experiment are unknown. We derive a greedy algorithm called GnIES to recover the equivalence class of the data-generating model without knowledge of the intervention targets. We leverage this procedure and evaluate the performance of GnIES on synthetic, real, and semi-synthetic data sets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-27T17:37:21Z)
• Learning Relational Causal Models with Cycles through Relational Acyclification [16.10327013845982]
  We introduce textitrelational acyclification, an operation specifically designed for relational models. We show that under the assumptions of relational acyclification and $sigma$-faithfulness, the relational causal discovery algorithm RCD is sound and complete for cyclic models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-08-25T17:00:42Z)
• DRFLM: Distributionally Robust Federated Learning with Inter-client Noise via Local Mixup [58.894901088797376]
  federated learning has emerged as a promising approach for training a global model using data from multiple organizations without leaking their raw data. We propose a general framework to solve the above two challenges simultaneously. We provide comprehensive theoretical analysis including robustness analysis, convergence analysis, and generalization ability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-16T08:08:29Z)
• Estimation of Bivariate Structural Causal Models by Variational Gaussian Process Regression Under Likelihoods Parametrised by Normalising Flows [74.85071867225533]
  Causal mechanisms can be described by structural causal models. One major drawback of state-of-the-art artificial intelligence is its lack of explainability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-06T14:52:58Z)
• Estimation of Structural Causal Model via Sparsely Mixing Independent Component Analysis [4.7210697296108926]
  We propose a new estimation method for a linear DAG model with non-Gaussian noises. The proposed method enables us to estimate the causal order and the parameters simultaneously. Numerical experiments show that the proposed method outperforms existing methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-07T13:08:10Z)
• Good Classifiers are Abundant in the Interpolating Regime [64.72044662855612]
  We develop a methodology to compute precisely the full distribution of test errors among interpolating classifiers. We find that test errors tend to concentrate around a small typical value $varepsilon*$, which deviates substantially from the test error of worst-case interpolating model. Our results show that the usual style of analysis in statistical learning theory may not be fine-grained enough to capture the good generalization performance observed in practice.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-22T21:12:31Z)
• Sparse learning with CART [18.351254916713305]
  Decision trees with binary splits are popularly constructed using Classification and Regression Trees (CART) methodology. This paper aims to study the statistical properties of regression trees constructed with CART methodology.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-07T20:55:52Z)
• A Critical View of the Structural Causal Model [89.43277111586258]
  We show that one can identify the cause and the effect without considering their interaction at all. We propose a new adversarial training method that mimics the disentangled structure of the causal model. Our multidimensional method outperforms the literature methods on both synthetic and real world datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-23T22:52:28Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.