Mindful-RAG: A Study of Points of Failure in Retrieval Augmented Generation
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2407.12216v2
- Date: Sun, 06 Oct 2024 16:15:09 GMT
- Title: Mindful-RAG: A Study of Points of Failure in Retrieval Augmented Generation
- Authors: Garima Agrawal, Tharindu Kumarage, Zeyad Alghamdi, Huan Liu,
- Abstract summary: Large Language Models (LLMs) are proficient at generating coherent and contextually relevant text.
Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) systems mitigate this by incorporating external knowledge sources, such as structured knowledge graphs (KGs)
Our study investigates this dilemma by analyzing error patterns in existing KG-based RAG methods and identifying eight critical failure points.
- Score: 11.471919529192048
- License:
- Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) are proficient at generating coherent and contextually relevant text but face challenges when addressing knowledge-intensive queries in domain-specific and factual question-answering tasks. Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) systems mitigate this by incorporating external knowledge sources, such as structured knowledge graphs (KGs). However, LLMs often struggle to produce accurate answers despite access to KG-extracted information containing necessary facts. Our study investigates this dilemma by analyzing error patterns in existing KG-based RAG methods and identifying eight critical failure points. We observed that these errors predominantly occur due to insufficient focus on discerning the question's intent and adequately gathering relevant context from the knowledge graph facts. Drawing on this analysis, we propose the Mindful-RAG approach, a framework designed for intent-based and contextually aligned knowledge retrieval. This method explicitly targets the identified failures and offers improvements in the correctness and relevance of responses provided by LLMs, representing a significant step forward from existing methods.
Related papers
- Harnessing Large Language Models for Knowledge Graph Question Answering via Adaptive Multi-Aspect Retrieval-Augmentation [81.18701211912779]
We introduce an Adaptive Multi-Aspect Retrieval-augmented over KGs (Amar) framework.
This method retrieves knowledge including entities, relations, and subgraphs, and converts each piece of retrieved text into prompt embeddings.
Our method has achieved state-of-the-art performance on two common datasets.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-12-24T16:38:04Z) - RAG-Star: Enhancing Deliberative Reasoning with Retrieval Augmented Verification and Refinement [85.08223786819532]
Existing large language models (LLMs) show exceptional problem-solving capabilities but might struggle with complex reasoning tasks.
We propose textbfRAG-Star, a novel RAG approach that integrates retrieved information to guide the tree-based deliberative reasoning process.
Our experiments involving Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct and GPT-4o demonstrate that RAG-Star significantly outperforms previous RAG and reasoning methods.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-12-17T13:05:36Z) - Context Awareness Gate For Retrieval Augmented Generation [2.749898166276854]
Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG) has emerged as a widely adopted approach to mitigate the limitations of large language models (LLMs) in answering domain-specific questions.
Previous research has predominantly focused on improving the accuracy and quality of retrieved data chunks to enhance the overall performance of the generation pipeline.
We investigate the impact of retrieving irrelevant information in open-domain question answering, highlighting its significant detrimental effect on the quality of LLM outputs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-11-25T06:48:38Z) - Eliciting Critical Reasoning in Retrieval-Augmented Language Models via Contrastive Explanations [4.697267141773321]
Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) has emerged as a critical mechanism in contemporary NLP to support Large Language Models (LLMs) in systematically accessing richer factual context.
Recent studies have shown that LLMs still struggle to critically analyse RAG-based in-context information, a limitation that may lead to incorrect inferences and hallucinations.
In this paper, we investigate how to elicit critical reasoning in RAG via contrastive explanations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-30T10:11:53Z) - StructRAG: Boosting Knowledge Intensive Reasoning of LLMs via Inference-time Hybrid Information Structurization [94.31508613367296]
Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) is a key means to effectively enhance large language models (LLMs)
We propose StructRAG, which can identify the optimal structure type for the task at hand, reconstruct original documents into this structured format, and infer answers based on the resulting structure.
Experiments show that StructRAG achieves state-of-the-art performance, particularly excelling in challenging scenarios.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-11T13:52:44Z) - Explore then Determine: A GNN-LLM Synergy Framework for Reasoning over Knowledge Graph [38.31983923708175]
This paper focuses on the Question Answering over Knowledge Graph (KGQA) task.
It proposes an Explore-then-Determine (EtD) framework that synergizes Large Language Models with graph neural networks (GNNs) for reasoning over KGs.
EtD achieves state-of-the-art performance and generates faithful reasoning results.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-03T09:38:28Z) - FiDeLiS: Faithful Reasoning in Large Language Model for Knowledge Graph Question Answering [46.41364317172677]
Large language models (LLMs) are often challenged by generating erroneous or hallucinated responses.
We propose a unified framework, FiDeLiS, designed to improve the factuality of LLM responses by anchoring answers to verifiable reasoning steps retrieved from a KG.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-22T17:56:53Z) - Context Matters: Data-Efficient Augmentation of Large Language Models
for Scientific Applications [15.893290942177112]
We explore the challenges inherent to Large Language Models (LLMs) like GPT-4.
The capacity of LLMs to present erroneous answers in a coherent and semantically rigorous manner complicates the detection of factual inaccuracies.
Our work aims to enhance the understanding and mitigation of such errors, thereby contributing to the improvement of LLM accuracy and reliability.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-12-12T08:43:20Z) - Mitigating Large Language Model Hallucinations via Autonomous Knowledge
Graph-based Retrofitting [51.7049140329611]
This paper proposes Knowledge Graph-based Retrofitting (KGR) to mitigate factual hallucination during the reasoning process.
Experiments show that KGR can significantly improve the performance of LLMs on factual QA benchmarks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-22T11:08:38Z) - Self-RAG: Learning to Retrieve, Generate, and Critique through
Self-Reflection [74.51523859064802]
We introduce a new framework called Self-Reflective Retrieval-Augmented Generation (Self-RAG)
Self-RAG enhances an LM's quality and factuality through retrieval and self-reflection.
It significantly outperforms state-of-the-art LLMs and retrieval-augmented models on a diverse set of tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-17T18:18:32Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.