Mindful-RAG: A Study of Points of Failure in Retrieval Augmented Generation
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2407.12216v2
- Date: Sun, 06 Oct 2024 16:15:09 GMT
- Title: Mindful-RAG: A Study of Points of Failure in Retrieval Augmented Generation
- Authors: Garima Agrawal, Tharindu Kumarage, Zeyad Alghamdi, Huan Liu,
- Abstract summary: Large Language Models (LLMs) are proficient at generating coherent and contextually relevant text.
Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) systems mitigate this by incorporating external knowledge sources, such as structured knowledge graphs (KGs)
Our study investigates this dilemma by analyzing error patterns in existing KG-based RAG methods and identifying eight critical failure points.
- Score: 11.471919529192048
- License:
- Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) are proficient at generating coherent and contextually relevant text but face challenges when addressing knowledge-intensive queries in domain-specific and factual question-answering tasks. Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) systems mitigate this by incorporating external knowledge sources, such as structured knowledge graphs (KGs). However, LLMs often struggle to produce accurate answers despite access to KG-extracted information containing necessary facts. Our study investigates this dilemma by analyzing error patterns in existing KG-based RAG methods and identifying eight critical failure points. We observed that these errors predominantly occur due to insufficient focus on discerning the question's intent and adequately gathering relevant context from the knowledge graph facts. Drawing on this analysis, we propose the Mindful-RAG approach, a framework designed for intent-based and contextually aligned knowledge retrieval. This method explicitly targets the identified failures and offers improvements in the correctness and relevance of responses provided by LLMs, representing a significant step forward from existing methods.
Related papers
- Context Awareness Gate For Retrieval Augmented Generation [2.749898166276854]
Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG) has emerged as a widely adopted approach to mitigate the limitations of large language models (LLMs) in answering domain-specific questions.
Previous research has predominantly focused on improving the accuracy and quality of retrieved data chunks to enhance the overall performance of the generation pipeline.
We investigate the impact of retrieving irrelevant information in open-domain question answering, highlighting its significant detrimental effect on the quality of LLM outputs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-11-25T06:48:38Z) - Exploring Knowledge Boundaries in Large Language Models for Retrieval Judgment [56.87031484108484]
Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly recognized for their practical applications.
Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) tackles this challenge and has shown a significant impact on LLMs.
By minimizing retrieval requests that yield neutral or harmful results, we can effectively reduce both time and computational costs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-11-09T15:12:28Z) - Eliciting Critical Reasoning in Retrieval-Augmented Language Models via Contrastive Explanations [4.697267141773321]
Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) has emerged as a critical mechanism in contemporary NLP to support Large Language Models (LLMs) in systematically accessing richer factual context.
Recent studies have shown that LLMs still struggle to critically analyse RAG-based in-context information, a limitation that may lead to incorrect inferences and hallucinations.
In this paper, we investigate how to elicit critical reasoning in RAG via contrastive explanations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-30T10:11:53Z) - StructRAG: Boosting Knowledge Intensive Reasoning of LLMs via Inference-time Hybrid Information Structurization [94.31508613367296]
Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) is a key means to effectively enhance large language models (LLMs)
We propose StructRAG, which can identify the optimal structure type for the task at hand, reconstruct original documents into this structured format, and infer answers based on the resulting structure.
Experiments show that StructRAG achieves state-of-the-art performance, particularly excelling in challenging scenarios.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-11T13:52:44Z) - GIVE: Structured Reasoning with Knowledge Graph Inspired Veracity Extrapolation [108.2008975785364]
Graph Inspired Veracity Extrapolation (GIVE) is a novel reasoning framework that integrates the parametric and non-parametric memories.
Our method facilitates a more logical and step-wise reasoning approach akin to experts' problem-solving, rather than gold answer retrieval.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-11T03:05:06Z) - Astute RAG: Overcoming Imperfect Retrieval Augmentation and Knowledge Conflicts for Large Language Models [20.605487145370752]
We find that imperfect retrieval augmentation might be inevitable and quite harmful, through controlled analysis under realistic conditions.
We propose Astute RAG, a novel RAG approach that adaptively elicits essential information from LLMs' internal knowledge.
Further analysis reveals that Astute RAG effectively resolves knowledge conflicts, improving the reliability and trustworthiness of RAG systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-09T17:59:58Z) - Exploring Automatic Cryptographic API Misuse Detection in the Era of LLMs [60.32717556756674]
This paper introduces a systematic evaluation framework to assess Large Language Models in detecting cryptographic misuses.
Our in-depth analysis of 11,940 LLM-generated reports highlights that the inherent instabilities in LLMs can lead to over half of the reports being false positives.
The optimized approach achieves a remarkable detection rate of nearly 90%, surpassing traditional methods and uncovering previously unknown misuses in established benchmarks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-23T15:31:26Z) - Explore then Determine: A GNN-LLM Synergy Framework for Reasoning over Knowledge Graph [38.31983923708175]
This paper focuses on the Question Answering over Knowledge Graph (KGQA) task.
It proposes an Explore-then-Determine (EtD) framework that synergizes Large Language Models with graph neural networks (GNNs) for reasoning over KGs.
EtD achieves state-of-the-art performance and generates faithful reasoning results.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-03T09:38:28Z) - Context Matters: Data-Efficient Augmentation of Large Language Models
for Scientific Applications [15.893290942177112]
We explore the challenges inherent to Large Language Models (LLMs) like GPT-4.
The capacity of LLMs to present erroneous answers in a coherent and semantically rigorous manner complicates the detection of factual inaccuracies.
Our work aims to enhance the understanding and mitigation of such errors, thereby contributing to the improvement of LLM accuracy and reliability.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-12-12T08:43:20Z) - Mitigating Large Language Model Hallucinations via Autonomous Knowledge
Graph-based Retrofitting [51.7049140329611]
This paper proposes Knowledge Graph-based Retrofitting (KGR) to mitigate factual hallucination during the reasoning process.
Experiments show that KGR can significantly improve the performance of LLMs on factual QA benchmarks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-22T11:08:38Z) - Self-RAG: Learning to Retrieve, Generate, and Critique through
Self-Reflection [74.51523859064802]
We introduce a new framework called Self-Reflective Retrieval-Augmented Generation (Self-RAG)
Self-RAG enhances an LM's quality and factuality through retrieval and self-reflection.
It significantly outperforms state-of-the-art LLMs and retrieval-augmented models on a diverse set of tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-17T18:18:32Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.