Latent Causal Probing: A Formal Perspective on Probing with Causal Models of Data
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2407.13765v1
- Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2024 17:59:27 GMT
- Title: Latent Causal Probing: A Formal Perspective on Probing with Causal Models of Data
- Authors: Charles Jin,
- Abstract summary: We develop a formal perspective on probing using structural causal models (SCM)
We extend a recent study of LMs in the context of a synthetic grid-world navigation task.
Our techniques provide robust empirical evidence for the ability of LMs to learn the latent causal concepts underlying text.
- Score: 3.988614978933934
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: As language models (LMs) deliver increasing performance on a range of NLP tasks, probing classifiers have become an indispensable technique in the effort to better understand their inner workings. A typical setup involves (1) defining an auxiliary task consisting of a dataset of text annotated with labels, then (2) supervising small classifiers to predict the labels from the representations of a pretrained LM as it processed the dataset. A high probing accuracy is interpreted as evidence that the LM has learned to perform the auxiliary task as an unsupervised byproduct of its original pretraining objective. Despite the widespread usage of probes, however, the robust design and analysis of probing experiments remains a challenge. We develop a formal perspective on probing using structural causal models (SCM). Specifically, given an SCM which explains the distribution of tokens observed during training, we frame the central hypothesis as whether the LM has learned to represent the latent variables of the SCM. Empirically, we extend a recent study of LMs in the context of a synthetic grid-world navigation task, where having an exact model of the underlying causal structure allows us to draw strong inferences from the result of probing experiments. Our techniques provide robust empirical evidence for the ability of LMs to learn the latent causal concepts underlying text.
Related papers
- What Do Language Models Learn in Context? The Structured Task Hypothesis [89.65045443150889]
Large language models (LLMs) learn a novel task from in-context examples presented in a demonstration, termed in-context learning (ICL)
One popular hypothesis explains ICL by task selection.
Another popular hypothesis is that ICL is a form of meta-learning, i.e., the models learn a learning algorithm at pre-training time and apply it to the demonstration.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-06T16:15:34Z) - Unveiling LLMs: The Evolution of Latent Representations in a Temporal Knowledge Graph [15.129079475322637]
Large Language Models (LLMs) demonstrate an impressive capacity to recall a vast range of common factual knowledge information.
We propose an end-to-end framework that jointly decodes the factual knowledge embedded in the latent space of LLMs.
We showcase our framework with local and global interpretability analyses using two claim verification datasets.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-04T17:45:59Z) - The Common Stability Mechanism behind most Self-Supervised Learning
Approaches [64.40701218561921]
We provide a framework to explain the stability mechanism of different self-supervised learning techniques.
We discuss the working mechanism of contrastive techniques like SimCLR, non-contrastive techniques like BYOL, SWAV, SimSiam, Barlow Twins, and DINO.
We formulate different hypotheses and test them using the Imagenet100 dataset.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-22T20:36:24Z) - From Understanding to Utilization: A Survey on Explainability for Large
Language Models [27.295767173801426]
This survey underscores the imperative for increased explainability in Large Language Models (LLMs)
Our focus is primarily on pre-trained Transformer-based LLMs, which pose distinctive interpretability challenges due to their scale and complexity.
When considering the utilization of explainability, we explore several compelling methods that concentrate on model editing, control generation, and model enhancement.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-01-23T16:09:53Z) - Understanding Self-Supervised Learning of Speech Representation via
Invariance and Redundancy Reduction [0.45060992929802207]
Self-supervised learning (SSL) has emerged as a promising paradigm for learning flexible speech representations from unlabeled data.
This study provides an empirical analysis of Barlow Twins (BT), an SSL technique inspired by theories of redundancy reduction in human perception.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-09-07T10:23:59Z) - Improving Open Information Extraction with Large Language Models: A
Study on Demonstration Uncertainty [52.72790059506241]
Open Information Extraction (OIE) task aims at extracting structured facts from unstructured text.
Despite the potential of large language models (LLMs) like ChatGPT as a general task solver, they lag behind state-of-the-art (supervised) methods in OIE tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-09-07T01:35:24Z) - Beyond Distributional Hypothesis: Let Language Models Learn Meaning-Text
Correspondence [45.9949173746044]
We show that large-size pre-trained language models (PLMs) do not satisfy the logical negation property (LNP)
We propose a novel intermediate training task, names meaning-matching, designed to directly learn a meaning-text correspondence.
We find that the task enables PLMs to learn lexical semantic information.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-05-08T08:37:36Z) - Masked Language Modeling and the Distributional Hypothesis: Order Word
Matters Pre-training for Little [74.49773960145681]
A possible explanation for the impressive performance of masked language model (MLM)-training is that such models have learned to represent the syntactic structures prevalent in NLP pipelines.
In this paper, we propose a different explanation: pre-trains succeed on downstream tasks almost entirely due to their ability to model higher-order word co-occurrence statistics.
Our results show that purely distributional information largely explains the success of pre-training, and underscore the importance of curating challenging evaluation datasets that require deeper linguistic knowledge.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-04-14T06:30:36Z) - Paired Examples as Indirect Supervision in Latent Decision Models [109.76417071249945]
We introduce a way to leverage paired examples that provide stronger cues for learning latent decisions.
We apply our method to improve compositional question answering using neural module networks on the DROP dataset.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-04-05T03:58:30Z) - oLMpics -- On what Language Model Pre-training Captures [84.60594612120173]
We propose eight reasoning tasks, which require operations such as comparison, conjunction, and composition.
A fundamental challenge is to understand whether the performance of a LM on a task should be attributed to the pre-trained representations or to the process of fine-tuning on the task data.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2019-12-31T12:11:35Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.