Business and Regulatory Responses to Artificial Intelligence: Dynamic Regulation, Innovation Ecosystems and the Strategic Management of Disruptive Technology

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2407.19439v1
• Date: Sun, 28 Jul 2024 09:34:03 GMT
• Title: Business and Regulatory Responses to Artificial Intelligence: Dynamic Regulation, Innovation Ecosystems and the Strategic Management of Disruptive Technology
• Authors: Mark Fenwick, Erik P. M. Vermeulen, Marcelo Corrales Compagnucci,
• Abstract summary: This article identifies two promising strategies for meeting the AI challenge. First, dynamic regulation, in the form of regulatory sandboxes and other regulatory approaches that aim to provide a space for responsible AI-related innovation. The second strategy relates to so-called innovation ecosystems. It is argued that such ecosystems are most effective when they afford opportunities for creative partnerships between well-established corporations and AI-focused startups.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Identifying and then implementing an effective response to disruptive new AI technologies is enormously challenging for any business looking to integrate AI into their operations, as well as regulators looking to leverage AI-related innovation as a mechanism for achieving regional economic growth. These business and regulatory challenges are particularly significant given the broad reach of AI, as well as the multiple uncertainties surrounding such technologies and their future development and effects. This article identifies two promising strategies for meeting the AI challenge, focusing on the example of Fintech. First, dynamic regulation, in the form of regulatory sandboxes and other regulatory approaches that aim to provide a space for responsible AI-related innovation. An empirical study provides preliminary evidence to suggest that jurisdictions that adopt a more proactive approach to Fintech regulation can attract greater investment. The second strategy relates to so-called innovation ecosystems. It is argued that such ecosystems are most effective when they afford opportunities for creative partnerships between well-established corporations and AI-focused startups and that this aspect of a successful innovation ecosystem is often overlooked in the existing discussion. The article suggests that these two strategies are interconnected, in that greater investment is an important element in both fostering and signaling a well-functioning innovation ecosystem and that a well-functioning ecosystem will, in turn, attract more funding. The resulting synergies between these strategies can, therefore, provide a jurisdiction with a competitive edge in becoming a regional hub for AI-related activity.

Related papers

• The California Report on Frontier AI Policy [110.35302787349856]
  Continued progress in frontier AI carries the potential for profound advances in scientific discovery, economic productivity, and broader social well-being.<n>As the epicenter of global AI innovation, California has a unique opportunity to continue supporting developments in frontier AI.<n>Report derives policy principles that can inform how California approaches the use, assessment, and governance of frontier AI.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-17T23:33:21Z)
• Open and Sustainable AI: challenges, opportunities and the road ahead in the life sciences [50.9036832382286]
  We review the increased erosion of trust in AI research outputs, driven by the issues of poor reusability.<n>We discuss the fragmented components of the AI ecosystem and lack of guiding pathways to best support Open and Sustainable AI.<n>Our work connects researchers with relevant AI resources, facilitating the implementation of sustainable, reusable and transparent AI.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-22T12:52:34Z)
• Enterprise Architecture as a Dynamic Capability for Scalable and Sustainable Generative AI adoption: Bridging Innovation and Governance in Large Organisations [55.2480439325792]
  Generative Artificial Intelligence is a powerful new technology with the potential to boost innovation and reshape governance in many industries.<n>However, organisations face major challenges in scaling GenAI, including technology complexity, governance gaps and resource misalignments.<n>This study explores how Enterprise Architecture Management can meet the complex requirements of GenAI adoption within large enterprises.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-09T07:41:33Z)
• Towards Adaptive AI Governance: Comparative Insights from the U.S., EU, and Asia [0.0]
  This study conducts a comparative analysis of AI trends in the United States (US), the European Union (EU), and Asia. It focuses on three key dimensions: generative AI, ethical oversight, and industrial applications. The US prioritizes market-driven innovation with minimal regulatory constraints, the EU enforces a precautionary risk-based framework emphasizing ethical safeguards, and Asia employs state-guided AI strategies that balance rapid deployment with regulatory oversight.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-01T11:05:47Z)
• Safety is Essential for Responsible Open-Ended Systems [47.172735322186]
  Open-Endedness is the ability of AI systems to continuously and autonomously generate novel and diverse artifacts or solutions. This position paper argues that the inherently dynamic and self-propagating nature of Open-Ended AI introduces significant, underexplored risks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-06T21:32:07Z)
• From Efficiency Gains to Rebound Effects: The Problem of Jevons' Paradox in AI's Polarized Environmental Debate [69.05573887799203]
  Much of this debate has concentrated on direct impact without addressing the significant indirect effects. This paper examines how the problem of Jevons' Paradox applies to AI, whereby efficiency gains may paradoxically spur increased consumption. We argue that understanding these second-order impacts requires an interdisciplinary approach, combining lifecycle assessments with socio-economic analyses.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-27T22:45:06Z)
• TOAST Framework: A Multidimensional Approach to Ethical and Sustainable AI Integration in Organizations [0.38073142980732994]
  This paper introduces the Trustworthy, Optimized, Adaptable, and Socio-Technologically harmonious (TOAST) framework. It focuses on reliability, accountability, technical advancement, adaptability, and socio-technical harmony. By grounding the TOAST framework in healthcare case studies, this paper provides a robust evaluation of its practicality and theoretical soundness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-07T05:13:39Z)
• From Principles to Practice: A Deep Dive into AI Ethics and Regulations [13.753819576072127]
  The article thoroughly analyzes the ground-breaking AI regulatory framework proposed by the European Union. Considering the technical efforts and strategies undertaken by academics and industry to uphold these principles, we explore the synergies and conflicts among the five ethical principles.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-06T00:46:20Z)
• Comprehensive Overview of Artificial Intelligence Applications in Modern Industries [0.3374875022248866]
  This paper explores the applications of AI across four key sectors: healthcare, finance, manufacturing, and retail. We discuss the implications of AI integration, including ethical considerations, the future trajectory of AI development, and its potential to drive economic growth.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-19T19:22:52Z)
• Navigating the sociotechnical labyrinth: Dynamic certification for responsible embodied AI [19.959138971887395]
  We argue that sociotechnical requirements shape the governance of artificially intelligent (AI) systems. Our proposed transdisciplinary approach is designed to ensure the safe, ethical, and practical deployment of AI systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-16T08:35:26Z)
• Open Problems in Technical AI Governance [93.89102632003996]
  Technical AI governance refers to technical analysis and tools for supporting the effective governance of AI. This paper is intended as a resource for technical researchers or research funders looking to contribute to AI governance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-20T21:13:56Z)
• Blockchain-based AI Methods for Managing Industrial IoT: Recent Developments, Integration Challenges and Opportunities [3.3030080038744947]
  Authors present a comprehensive survey on the AI approaches with BC in the smart IIoT. We focus on state-of-the-art overviews regarding AI, BC, and smart IoT applications. We highlight the various issues--security, stability, scalability, and confidentiality.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-21T07:34:49Z)
• Managing extreme AI risks amid rapid progress [171.05448842016125]
  We describe risks that include large-scale social harms, malicious uses, and irreversible loss of human control over autonomous AI systems. There is a lack of consensus about how exactly such risks arise, and how to manage them. Present governance initiatives lack the mechanisms and institutions to prevent misuse and recklessness, and barely address autonomous systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-26T17:59:06Z)
• Regulation and NLP (RegNLP): Taming Large Language Models [51.41095330188972]
  We argue how NLP research can benefit from proximity to regulatory studies and adjacent fields. We advocate for the development of a new multidisciplinary research space on regulation and NLP.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-09T09:22:40Z)
• Fairness in Agreement With European Values: An Interdisciplinary Perspective on AI Regulation [61.77881142275982]
  This interdisciplinary position paper considers various concerns surrounding fairness and discrimination in AI, and discusses how AI regulations address them. We first look at AI and fairness through the lenses of law, (AI) industry, sociotechnology, and (moral) philosophy, and present various perspectives. We identify and propose the roles AI Regulation should take to make the endeavor of the AI Act a success in terms of AI fairness concerns.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-08T12:32:08Z)
• Putting AI Ethics into Practice: The Hourglass Model of Organizational AI Governance [0.0]
  We present an AI governance framework, which targets organizations that develop and use AI systems. The framework is designed to help organizations deploying AI systems translate ethical AI principles into practice.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-01T08:55:27Z)
• An interdisciplinary conceptual study of Artificial Intelligence (AI) for helping benefit-risk assessment practices: Towards a comprehensive qualification matrix of AI programs and devices (pre-print 2020) [55.41644538483948]
  This paper proposes a comprehensive analysis of existing concepts coming from different disciplines tackling the notion of intelligence. The aim is to identify shared notions or discrepancies to consider for qualifying AI systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-07T12:01:31Z)
• Qlib: An AI-oriented Quantitative Investment Platform [86.8580406876954]
  AI technologies have raised new challenges to the quantitative investment system. Qlib aims to realize the potential, empower the research, and create the value of AI technologies in quantitative investment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-22T12:57:10Z)
• Where Responsible AI meets Reality: Practitioner Perspectives on Enablers for shifting Organizational Practices [3.119859292303396]
  This paper examines and seeks to offer a framework for analyzing how organizational culture and structure impact the effectiveness of responsible AI initiatives in practice. We present the results of semi-structured qualitative interviews with practitioners working in industry, investigating common challenges, ethical tensions, and effective enablers for responsible AI initiatives.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-22T15:57:30Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.