AgEval: A Benchmark for Zero-Shot and Few-Shot Plant Stress Phenotyping with Multimodal LLMs

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2407.19617v1
• Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2024 00:39:51 GMT
• Title: AgEval: A Benchmark for Zero-Shot and Few-Shot Plant Stress Phenotyping with Multimodal LLMs
• Authors: Muhammad Arbab Arshad, Talukder Zaki Jubery, Tirtho Roy, Rim Nassiri, Asheesh K. Singh, Arti Singh, Chinmay Hegde, Baskar Ganapathysubramanian, Aditya Balu, Adarsh Krishnamurthy, Soumik Sarkar,
• Abstract summary: AgEval is a benchmark comprising 12 diverse plant stress phenotyping tasks. Our study assesses zero-shot and few-shot in-context learning performance of state-of-the-art models.
• Score: 19.7240633020344
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Plant stress phenotyping traditionally relies on expert assessments and specialized models, limiting scalability in agriculture. Recent advances in multimodal large language models (LLMs) offer potential solutions to this challenge. We present AgEval, a benchmark comprising 12 diverse plant stress phenotyping tasks, to evaluate these models' capabilities. Our study assesses zero-shot and few-shot in-context learning performance of state-of-the-art models, including Claude, GPT, Gemini, and LLaVA. Results show significant performance improvements with few-shot learning, with F1 scores increasing from 46.24% to 73.37% in 8-shot identification for the best-performing model. Few-shot examples from other classes in the dataset have negligible or negative impacts, although having the exact category example helps to increase performance by 15.38%. We also quantify the consistency of model performance across different classes within each task, finding that the coefficient of variance (CV) ranges from 26.02% to 58.03% across models, implying that subject matter expertise is needed - of 'difficult' classes - to achieve reliability in performance. AgEval establishes baseline metrics for multimodal LLMs in agricultural applications, offering insights into their promise for enhancing plant stress phenotyping at scale. Benchmark and code can be accessed at: https://anonymous.4open.science/r/AgEval/

Related papers

• Unraveling the Capabilities of Language Models in News Summarization [0.0]
  This work provides a comprehensive benchmarking of 20 recent language models, focusing on smaller ones for the news summarization task. We focus in this study on zero-shot and few-shot learning settings and we apply a robust evaluation methodology. We highlight the exceptional performance of GPT-3.5-Turbo and GPT-4, which generally dominate due to their advanced capabilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-30T04:20:16Z)
• Linear Discriminant Analysis in Credit Scoring: A Transparent Hybrid Model Approach [9.88281854509076]
  We implement Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA) as a feature reduction technique, which reduces the burden of the models complexity. Our hybrid model, XG-DNN, outperformed other models with the highest accuracy of 99.45% and a 99% F1 score with LDA. To interpret model decisions, we have applied 2 different explainable AI techniques named LIME (local) and Morris Sensitivity Analysis (global)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-05T14:21:18Z)
• A Comprehensive Evaluation of Large Language Models on Mental Illnesses [0.8458496687170665]
  GPT-4 and Llama 3 exhibited superior performance in binary disorder detection, with accuracies reaching up to 85% on certain datasets. prompt engineering played a crucial role in enhancing model performance. Despite promising results, our analysis identified several challenges, including variability in performance across datasets and the need for careful prompt engineering.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-24T02:58:52Z)
• Automated Classification of Dry Bean Varieties Using XGBoost and SVM Models [0.0]
  This paper presents a comparative study on the automated classification of seven different varieties of dry beans using machine learning models. The XGBoost and SVM models achieved overall correct classification rates of 94.00% and 94.39%, respectively. This study contributes to the growing body of work on precision agriculture, demonstrating that automated systems can significantly support seed quality control and crop yield optimization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-02T13:05:33Z)
• Uncertainty Aware Learning for Language Model Alignment [97.36361196793929]
  We propose uncertainty-aware learning (UAL) to improve the model alignment of different task scenarios. We implement UAL in a simple fashion -- adaptively setting the label smoothing value of training according to the uncertainty of individual samples. Experiments on widely used benchmarks demonstrate that our UAL significantly and consistently outperforms standard supervised fine-tuning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-07T11:37:45Z)
• Predictive Analytics of Varieties of Potatoes [2.336821989135698]
  We explore the application of machine learning algorithms specifically to enhance the selection process of Russet potato clones in breeding trials. This study addresses the challenge of efficiently identifying high-yield, disease-resistant, and climate-resilient potato varieties.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-04T00:49:05Z)
• QualEval: Qualitative Evaluation for Model Improvement [82.73561470966658]
  We propose QualEval, which augments quantitative scalar metrics with automated qualitative evaluation as a vehicle for model improvement. QualEval uses a powerful LLM reasoner and our novel flexible linear programming solver to generate human-readable insights. We demonstrate that leveraging its insights, for example, improves the absolute performance of the Llama 2 model by up to 15% points relative.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-06T00:21:44Z)
• A Comprehensive Evaluation and Analysis Study for Chinese Spelling Check [53.152011258252315]
  We show that using phonetic and graphic information reasonably is effective for Chinese Spelling Check. Models are sensitive to the error distribution of the test set, which reflects the shortcomings of models. The commonly used benchmark, SIGHAN, can not reliably evaluate models' performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-25T17:02:38Z)
• FairIF: Boosting Fairness in Deep Learning via Influence Functions with Validation Set Sensitive Attributes [51.02407217197623]
  We propose a two-stage training algorithm named FAIRIF. It minimizes the loss over the reweighted data set where the sample weights are computed. We show that FAIRIF yields models with better fairness-utility trade-offs against various types of bias.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-15T05:14:48Z)
• Sparse MoEs meet Efficient Ensembles [49.313497379189315]
  We study the interplay of two popular classes of such models: ensembles of neural networks and sparse mixture of experts (sparse MoEs) We present Efficient Ensemble of Experts (E$3$), a scalable and simple ensemble of sparse MoEs that takes the best of both classes of models, while using up to 45% fewer FLOPs than a deep ensemble.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-07T11:58:35Z)
• CHEER: Rich Model Helps Poor Model via Knowledge Infusion [69.23072792708263]
  We develop a knowledge infusion framework named CHEER that can succinctly summarize such rich model into transferable representations. Our empirical results showed that CHEER outperformed baselines by 5.60% to 46.80% in terms of the macro-F1 score on multiple physiological datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-21T21:44:21Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.