Can Optimization Trajectories Explain Multi-Task Transfer?

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2408.14677v1
• Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2024 22:57:01 GMT
• Title: Can Optimization Trajectories Explain Multi-Task Transfer?
• Authors: David Mueller, Mark Dredze, Nicholas Andrews,
• Abstract summary: We study how multi-task learning affects generalization in deep learning. We find that MTL results in a generalization gap-a gap in generalization at comparable training loss-between single-task and multi-task trajectories. Our work sheds light on the underlying causes for failures in MTL and, importantly, raises questions about the role of general purpose multi-task optimization algorithms.
• Score: 19.797036312370185
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Despite the widespread adoption of multi-task training in deep learning, little is understood about how multi-task learning (MTL) affects generalization. Prior work has conjectured that the negative effects of MTL are due to optimization challenges that arise during training, and many optimization methods have been proposed to improve multi-task performance. However, recent work has shown that these methods fail to consistently improve multi-task generalization. In this work, we seek to improve our understanding of these failures by empirically studying how MTL impacts the optimization of tasks, and whether this impact can explain the effects of MTL on generalization. We show that MTL results in a generalization gap-a gap in generalization at comparable training loss-between single-task and multi-task trajectories early into training. However, we find that factors of the optimization trajectory previously proposed to explain generalization gaps in single-task settings cannot explain the generalization gaps between single-task and multi-task models. Moreover, we show that the amount of gradient conflict between tasks is correlated with negative effects to task optimization, but is not predictive of generalization. Our work sheds light on the underlying causes for failures in MTL and, importantly, raises questions about the role of general purpose multi-task optimization algorithms.

Related papers

• Learn from Downstream and Be Yourself in Multimodal Large Language Model Fine-Tuning [104.27224674122313]
  Fine-tuning MLLM has become a common practice to improve performance on specific downstream tasks. To balance the trade-off between generalization and specialization, we propose measuring the parameter importance for both pre-trained and fine-tuning distributions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-17T01:16:37Z)
• Fair Resource Allocation in Multi-Task Learning [12.776767874217663]
  Multi-task learning (MTL) can leverage the shared knowledge across tasks, resulting in improved data efficiency and generalization performance. A major challenge in MTL lies in the presence of conflicting gradients, which can hinder the fair optimization of some tasks. Inspired by fair resource allocation in communication networks, we propose FairGrad, a novel MTL optimization method.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-23T22:46:14Z)
• When Multi-Task Learning Meets Partial Supervision: A Computer Vision Review [7.776434991976473]
  Multi-Task Learning (MTL) aims to learn multiple tasks simultaneously while exploiting their mutual relationships. This review focuses on how MTL could be utilised under different partial supervision settings to address these challenges.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-25T20:08:41Z)
• Equitable Multi-task Learning [18.65048321820911]
  Multi-task learning (MTL) has achieved great success in various research domains, such as CV, NLP and IR. We propose a novel multi-task optimization method, named EMTL, to achieve equitable MTL. Our method stably outperforms state-of-the-art methods on the public benchmark datasets of two different research domains.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-15T03:37:23Z)
• Task Aware Feature Extraction Framework for Sequential Dependence Multi-Task Learning [1.0765359420035392]
  We analyze sequential dependence MTL from rigorous mathematical perspective. We propose a Task Aware Feature Extraction (TAFE) framework for sequential dependence MTL.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-06T13:12:59Z)
• Multi-Task Learning as a Bargaining Game [63.49888996291245]
  In Multi-task learning (MTL), a joint model is trained to simultaneously make predictions for several tasks. Since the gradients of these different tasks may conflict, training a joint model for MTL often yields lower performance than its corresponding single-task counterparts. We propose viewing the gradients combination step as a bargaining game, where tasks negotiate to reach an agreement on a joint direction of parameter update.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-02T13:21:53Z)
• In Defense of the Unitary Scalarization for Deep Multi-Task Learning [121.76421174107463]
  We present a theoretical analysis suggesting that many specialized multi-tasks can be interpreted as forms of regularization. We show that, when coupled with standard regularization and stabilization techniques, unitary scalarization matches or improves upon the performance of complex multitasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-11T18:44:17Z)
• Variational Multi-Task Learning with Gumbel-Softmax Priors [105.22406384964144]
  Multi-task learning aims to explore task relatedness to improve individual tasks. We propose variational multi-task learning (VMTL), a general probabilistic inference framework for learning multiple related tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-09T18:49:45Z)
• SLAW: Scaled Loss Approximate Weighting for Efficient Multi-Task Learning [0.0]
  Multi-task learning (MTL) is a subfield of machine learning with important applications. The best MTL optimization methods require individually computing the gradient of each task's loss function. We propose Scaled Loss Approximate Weighting (SLAW), a method for multi-task optimization that matches the performance of the best existing methods while being much more efficient.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-16T20:58:40Z)
• Small Towers Make Big Differences [59.243296878666285]
  Multi-task learning aims at solving multiple machine learning tasks at the same time. A good solution to a multi-task learning problem should be generalizable in addition to being Pareto optimal. We propose a method of under- parameterized self-auxiliaries for multi-task models to achieve the best of both worlds.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-08-13T10:45:31Z)
• Multi-Task Learning for Dense Prediction Tasks: A Survey [87.66280582034838]
  Multi-task learning (MTL) techniques have shown promising results w.r.t. performance, computations and/or memory footprint. We provide a well-rounded view on state-of-the-art deep learning approaches for MTL in computer vision.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-28T09:15:50Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.