WildFeedback: Aligning LLMs With In-situ User Interactions And Feedback

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2408.15549v1
• Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2024 05:53:46 GMT
• Title: WildFeedback: Aligning LLMs With In-situ User Interactions And Feedback
• Authors: Taiwei Shi, Zhuoer Wang, Longqi Yang, Ying-Chun Lin, Zexue He, Mengting Wan, Pei Zhou, Sujay Jauhar, Xiaofeng Xu, Xia Song, Jennifer Neville,
• Abstract summary: We introduce WildFeedback, a novel framework that leverages real-time, in-situ user interactions to create preference datasets that more accurately reflect authentic human values. We apply this framework to a large corpus of user-LLM conversations, resulting in a rich preference dataset that reflects genuine user preferences. Our experiments demonstrate that LLMs fine-tuned on WildFeedback exhibit significantly improved alignment with user preferences.
• Score: 28.317315761271804
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: As large language models (LLMs) continue to advance, aligning these models with human preferences has emerged as a critical challenge. Traditional alignment methods, relying on human or LLM annotated datasets, are limited by their resource-intensive nature, inherent subjectivity, and the risk of feedback loops that amplify model biases. To overcome these limitations, we introduce WildFeedback, a novel framework that leverages real-time, in-situ user interactions to create preference datasets that more accurately reflect authentic human values. WildFeedback operates through a three-step process: feedback signal identification, preference data construction, and user-guided evaluation. We applied this framework to a large corpus of user-LLM conversations, resulting in a rich preference dataset that reflects genuine user preferences. This dataset captures the nuances of user preferences by identifying and classifying feedback signals within natural conversations, thereby enabling the construction of more representative and context-sensitive alignment data. Our extensive experiments demonstrate that LLMs fine-tuned on WildFeedback exhibit significantly improved alignment with user preferences, as evidenced by both traditional benchmarks and our proposed user-guided evaluation. By incorporating real-time feedback from actual users, WildFeedback addresses the scalability, subjectivity, and bias challenges that plague existing approaches, marking a significant step toward developing LLMs that are more responsive to the diverse and evolving needs of their users. In summary, WildFeedback offers a robust, scalable solution for aligning LLMs with true human values, setting a new standard for the development and evaluation of user-centric language models.

Related papers

• Stop Playing the Guessing Game! Target-free User Simulation for Evaluating Conversational Recommender Systems [15.481944998961847]
  PEPPER is an evaluation protocol with target-free user simulators constructed from real-user interaction histories and reviews. PEPPER enables realistic user-CRS dialogues without falling into simplistic guessing games. PEPPER presents detailed measures for comprehensively evaluating the preference elicitation capabilities of CRSs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-25T07:36:20Z)
• Aligning LLMs with Individual Preferences via Interaction [51.72200436159636]
  We train large language models (LLMs) that can ''interact to align'' We develop a multi-turn preference dataset containing 3K+ multi-turn conversations in tree structures. For evaluation, we establish the ALOE benchmark, consisting of 100 carefully selected examples and well-designed metrics to measure the customized alignment performance during conversations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-04T17:48:29Z)
• UserSumBench: A Benchmark Framework for Evaluating User Summarization Approaches [25.133460380551327]
  Large language models (LLMs) have shown remarkable capabilities in generating user summaries from a long list of raw user activity data. These summaries capture essential user information such as preferences and interests, and are invaluable for personalization applications. However, the development of new summarization techniques is hindered by the lack of ground-truth labels, the inherent subjectivity of user summaries, and human evaluation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-30T01:56:57Z)
• Aligning Large Language Models from Self-Reference AI Feedback with one General Principle [61.105703857868775]
  We propose a self-reference-based AI feedback framework that enables a 13B Llama2-Chat to provide high-quality feedback. Specifically, we allow the AI to first respond to the user's instructions, then generate criticism of other answers based on its own response as a reference. Finally, we determine which answer better fits human preferences according to the criticism.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-17T03:51:46Z)
• Self-Augmented Preference Optimization: Off-Policy Paradigms for Language Model Alignment [104.18002641195442]
  We introduce Self-Augmented Preference Optimization (SAPO), an effective and scalable training paradigm that does not require existing paired data. Building on the self-play concept, which autonomously generates negative responses, we further incorporate an off-policy learning pipeline to enhance data exploration and exploitation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-31T14:21:04Z)
• Lusifer: LLM-based User SImulated Feedback Environment for online Recommender systems [0.0]
  Lusifer is a novel environment that generates simulated user feedback. It synthesizes user profiles and interaction histories to simulate responses and behaviors toward recommended items. Using the MovieLens100K dataset as proof of concept, Lusifer demonstrates accurate emulation of user behavior and preferences.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-22T05:43:15Z)
• How Reliable is Your Simulator? Analysis on the Limitations of Current LLM-based User Simulators for Conversational Recommendation [14.646529557978512]
  We analyze the limitations of using Large Language Models in constructing user simulators for Conversational Recommender System. Data leakage, which occurs in conversational history and the user simulator's replies, results in inflated evaluation results. We propose SimpleUserSim, employing a straightforward strategy to guide the topic toward the target items.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-25T04:21:06Z)
• RLVF: Learning from Verbal Feedback without Overgeneralization [94.19501420241188]
  We study the problem of incorporating verbal feedback without such overgeneralization. We develop a new method Contextualized Critiques with Constrained Preference Optimization (C3PO) Our approach effectively applies verbal feedback to relevant scenarios while preserving existing behaviors for other contexts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-16T18:50:24Z)
• Representation Learning with Large Language Models for Recommendation [34.46344639742642]
  We propose a model-agnostic framework RLMRec to enhance recommenders with large language models (LLMs)empowered representation learning. RLMRec incorporates auxiliary textual signals, develops a user/item profiling paradigm empowered by LLMs, and aligns the semantic space of LLMs with the representation space of collaborative relational signals.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-24T15:51:13Z)
• Bring Your Own Data! Self-Supervised Evaluation for Large Language Models [52.15056231665816]
  We propose a framework for self-supervised evaluation of Large Language Models (LLMs) We demonstrate self-supervised evaluation strategies for measuring closed-book knowledge, toxicity, and long-range context dependence. We find strong correlations between self-supervised and human-supervised evaluations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-23T17:59:09Z)
• Rethinking the Evaluation for Conversational Recommendation in the Era of Large Language Models [115.7508325840751]
  The recent success of large language models (LLMs) has shown great potential to develop more powerful conversational recommender systems (CRSs) In this paper, we embark on an investigation into the utilization of ChatGPT for conversational recommendation, revealing the inadequacy of the existing evaluation protocol. We propose an interactive Evaluation approach based on LLMs named iEvaLM that harnesses LLM-based user simulators.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-22T15:12:43Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.