WildFeedback: Aligning LLMs With In-situ User Interactions And Feedback

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2408.15549v2
• Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2025 06:14:31 GMT
• Title: WildFeedback: Aligning LLMs With In-situ User Interactions And Feedback
• Authors: Taiwei Shi, Zhuoer Wang, Longqi Yang, Ying-Chun Lin, Zexue He, Mengting Wan, Pei Zhou, Sujay Jauhar, Sihao Chen, Shan Xia, Hongfei Zhang, Jieyu Zhao, Xiaofeng Xu, Xia Song, Jennifer Neville,
• Abstract summary: We introduce WildFeedback, a novel framework that leverages in-situ user feedback during conversations with large language models (LLMs) to create preference datasets automatically. Our experiments demonstrate that LLMs fine-tuned on WildFeedback dataset exhibit significantly improved alignment with user preferences.
• Score: 36.06000681394939
• License:
• Abstract: As large language models (LLMs) continue to advance, aligning these models with human preferences has emerged as a critical challenge. Traditional alignment methods, relying on human or LLM annotated datasets, are limited by their resource-intensive nature, inherent subjectivity, misalignment with real-world user preferences, and the risk of feedback loops that amplify model biases. To overcome these limitations, we introduce WildFeedback, a novel framework that leverages in-situ user feedback during conversations with LLMs to create preference datasets automatically. Given a corpus of multi-turn user-LLM conversation, WildFeedback identifies and classifies user feedback to LLM responses between conversation turns. The user feedback is then used to create examples of preferred and dispreferred responses according to users' preference. Our experiments demonstrate that LLMs fine-tuned on WildFeedback dataset exhibit significantly improved alignment with user preferences, as evidenced by both traditional benchmarks and our proposed checklist-guided evaluation. By incorporating in-situ feedback from actual users, WildFeedback addresses the scalability, subjectivity, and bias challenges that plague existing approaches, marking a significant step toward developing LLMs that are more responsive to the diverse and evolving needs of their users.

Related papers

• Reason4Rec: Large Language Models for Recommendation with Deliberative User Preference Alignment [69.11529841118671]
  We propose a new Deliberative Recommendation task, which incorporates explicit reasoning about user preferences as an additional alignment goal. We then introduce the Reasoning-powered Recommender framework for deliberative user preference alignment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-04T07:17:54Z)
• Aligning LLMs with Individual Preferences via Interaction [51.72200436159636]
  We train large language models (LLMs) that can ''interact to align'' We develop a multi-turn preference dataset containing 3K+ multi-turn conversations in tree structures. For evaluation, we establish the ALOE benchmark, consisting of 100 carefully selected examples and well-designed metrics to measure the customized alignment performance during conversations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-04T17:48:29Z)
• Lusifer: LLM-based User SImulated Feedback Environment for online Recommender systems [0.0]
  We introduce Lusifer, a novel environment leveraging Large Language Models (LLMs) to generate simulated user feedback. Lusifer synthesizes user profiles and interaction histories to simulate responses and behaviors toward recommended items. Lusifer accurately emulates user behavior and preferences, even with reduced training data having an RMSE of 1.3.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-22T05:43:15Z)
• How Reliable is Your Simulator? Analysis on the Limitations of Current LLM-based User Simulators for Conversational Recommendation [14.646529557978512]
  We analyze the limitations of using Large Language Models in constructing user simulators for Conversational Recommender System. Data leakage, which occurs in conversational history and the user simulator's replies, results in inflated evaluation results. We propose SimpleUserSim, employing a straightforward strategy to guide the topic toward the target items.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-25T04:21:06Z)
• User-LLM: Efficient LLM Contextualization with User Embeddings [23.226164112909643]
  User-LLM is a novel framework that leverages user embeddings to directly contextualize large language models with user history interactions. Our approach achieves significant efficiency gains by representing user timelines directly as embeddings, leading to substantial inference speedups of up to 78.1X.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-21T08:03:27Z)
• RefuteBench: Evaluating Refuting Instruction-Following for Large Language Models [17.782410287625645]
  This paper proposes a benchmark, RefuteBench, covering tasks such as question answering, machine translation, and email writing. The evaluation aims to assess whether models can positively accept feedback in form of refuting instructions and whether they can consistently adhere to user demands throughout the conversation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-21T01:39:56Z)
• RLVF: Learning from Verbal Feedback without Overgeneralization [94.19501420241188]
  We study the problem of incorporating verbal feedback without such overgeneralization. We develop a new method Contextualized Critiques with Constrained Preference Optimization (C3PO) Our approach effectively applies verbal feedback to relevant scenarios while preserving existing behaviors for other contexts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-16T18:50:24Z)
• Representation Learning with Large Language Models for Recommendation [33.040389989173825]
  We propose a model-agnostic framework RLMRec to enhance recommenders with large language models (LLMs)empowered representation learning. RLMRec incorporates auxiliary textual signals, develops a user/item profiling paradigm empowered by LLMs, and aligns the semantic space of LLMs with the representation space of collaborative relational signals.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-24T15:51:13Z)
• Rethinking the Evaluation for Conversational Recommendation in the Era of Large Language Models [115.7508325840751]
  The recent success of large language models (LLMs) has shown great potential to develop more powerful conversational recommender systems (CRSs) In this paper, we embark on an investigation into the utilization of ChatGPT for conversational recommendation, revealing the inadequacy of the existing evaluation protocol. We propose an interactive Evaluation approach based on LLMs named iEvaLM that harnesses LLM-based user simulators.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-22T15:12:43Z)
• Reward Constrained Interactive Recommendation with Natural Language Feedback [158.8095688415973]
  We propose a novel constraint-augmented reinforcement learning (RL) framework to efficiently incorporate user preferences over time. Specifically, we leverage a discriminator to detect recommendations violating user historical preference. Our proposed framework is general and is further extended to the task of constrained text generation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-04T16:23:34Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.