Does Knowledge Localization Hold True? Surprising Differences Between Entity and Relation Perspectives in Language Models

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2409.00617v1
• Date: Sun, 1 Sep 2024 05:09:11 GMT
• Title: Does Knowledge Localization Hold True? Surprising Differences Between Entity and Relation Perspectives in Language Models
• Authors: Yifan Wei, Xiaoyan Yu, Yixuan Weng, Huanhuan Ma, Yuanzhe Zhang, Jun Zhao, Kang Liu,
• Abstract summary: This study investigates the differences between entity and relational knowledge through knowledge editing. To further elucidate the differences between entity and relational knowledge, we employ causal analysis to investigate how relational knowledge is stored in pre-trained models. This insight highlights the multifaceted nature of knowledge storage in language models, underscoring the complexity of manipulating specific types of knowledge within these models.
• Score: 20.157061521694096
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Large language models encapsulate knowledge and have demonstrated superior performance on various natural language processing tasks. Recent studies have localized this knowledge to specific model parameters, such as the MLP weights in intermediate layers. This study investigates the differences between entity and relational knowledge through knowledge editing. Our findings reveal that entity and relational knowledge cannot be directly transferred or mapped to each other. This result is unexpected, as logically, modifying the entity or the relation within the same knowledge triplet should yield equivalent outcomes. To further elucidate the differences between entity and relational knowledge, we employ causal analysis to investigate how relational knowledge is stored in pre-trained models. Contrary to prior research suggesting that knowledge is stored in MLP weights, our experiments demonstrate that relational knowledge is also significantly encoded in attention modules. This insight highlights the multifaceted nature of knowledge storage in language models, underscoring the complexity of manipulating specific types of knowledge within these models.

Related papers

• Probing Language Models on Their Knowledge Source [19.779433870719945]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) often encounter conflicts between their learned, internal (parametric knowledge, PK) and external knowledge provided during inference (contextual knowledge, CK)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-08T08:47:11Z)
• Chain-of-Knowledge: Integrating Knowledge Reasoning into Large Language Models by Learning from Knowledge Graphs [55.317267269115845]
  Chain-of-Knowledge (CoK) is a comprehensive framework for knowledge reasoning. CoK includes methodologies for both dataset construction and model learning. We conduct extensive experiments with KnowReason.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-30T10:49:32Z)
• KEHRL: Learning Knowledge-Enhanced Language Representations with Hierarchical Reinforcement Learning [32.086825891769585]
  Knowledge-enhanced pre-trained language models (KEPLMs) leverage relation triples from knowledge graphs (KGs) Previous works treat knowledge enhancement as two independent operations, i.e., knowledge injection and knowledge integration. This paper jointly addresses the problems of detecting positions for knowledge injection and integrating external knowledge into the model in order to avoid injecting inaccurate or irrelevant knowledge.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-24T07:32:35Z)
• Large Language Models are Limited in Out-of-Context Knowledge Reasoning [65.72847298578071]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) possess extensive knowledge and strong capabilities in performing in-context reasoning. This paper focuses on a significant aspect of out-of-context reasoning: Out-of-Context Knowledge Reasoning (OCKR), which is to combine multiple knowledge to infer new knowledge.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-11T15:58:59Z)
• Towards Reliable Latent Knowledge Estimation in LLMs: In-Context Learning vs. Prompting Based Factual Knowledge Extraction [15.534647327246239]
  We propose an approach for estimating the latent knowledge embedded inside large language models (LLMs) We leverage the in-context learning abilities of LLMs to estimate the extent to which an LLM knows the facts stored in a knowledge base.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-19T15:40:39Z)
• Commonsense Knowledge Transfer for Pre-trained Language Models [83.01121484432801]
  We introduce commonsense knowledge transfer, a framework to transfer the commonsense knowledge stored in a neural commonsense knowledge model to a general-purpose pre-trained language model. It first exploits general texts to form queries for extracting commonsense knowledge from the neural commonsense knowledge model. It then refines the language model with two self-supervised objectives: commonsense mask infilling and commonsense relation prediction.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-04T15:44:51Z)
• Knowledge Rumination for Pre-trained Language Models [77.55888291165462]
  We propose a new paradigm dubbed Knowledge Rumination to help the pre-trained language model utilize related latent knowledge without retrieving it from the external corpus. We apply the proposed knowledge rumination to various language models, including RoBERTa, DeBERTa, and GPT-3.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-15T15:47:09Z)
• UNTER: A Unified Knowledge Interface for Enhancing Pre-trained Language Models [100.4659557650775]
  We propose a UNified knowledge inTERface, UNTER, to provide a unified perspective to exploit both structured knowledge and unstructured knowledge. With both forms of knowledge injected, UNTER gains continuous improvements on a series of knowledge-driven NLP tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-02T17:33:28Z)
• The KITMUS Test: Evaluating Knowledge Integration from Multiple Sources in Natural Language Understanding Systems [87.3207729953778]
  We evaluate state-of-the-art coreference resolution models on our dataset. Several models struggle to reason on-the-fly over knowledge observed both at pretrain time and at inference time. Still, even the best performing models seem to have difficulties with reliably integrating knowledge presented only at inference time.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-15T23:26:54Z)
• LM-CORE: Language Models with Contextually Relevant External Knowledge [13.451001884972033]
  We argue that storing large amounts of knowledge in the model parameters is sub-optimal given the ever-growing amounts of knowledge and resource requirements. We present LM-CORE -- a general framework to achieve this -- that allows textitdecoupling of the language model training from the external knowledge source. Experimental results show that LM-CORE, having access to external knowledge, achieves significant and robust outperformance over state-of-the-art knowledge-enhanced language models on knowledge probing tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-08-12T18:59:37Z)
• Does Knowledge Help General NLU? An Empirical Study [13.305282275999781]
  We investigate the contribution of external knowledge by measuring the end-to-end performance of language models. We find that the introduction of knowledge can significantly improve the results on certain tasks while having no adverse effects on other tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-01T18:17:36Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.