VERA: Validation and Evaluation of Retrieval-Augmented Systems

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2409.03759v1
• Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2024 21:59:59 GMT
• Title: VERA: Validation and Evaluation of Retrieval-Augmented Systems
• Authors: Tianyu Ding, Adi Banerjee, Laurent Mombaerts, Yunhong Li, Tarik Borogovac, Juan Pablo De la Cruz Weinstein,
• Abstract summary: VERA is a framework designed to enhance the transparency and reliability of outputs from large language models (LLMs) We show how VERA can strengthen decision-making processes and trust in AI applications.
• Score: 5.709401805125129
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: The increasing use of Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) systems in various applications necessitates stringent protocols to ensure RAG systems accuracy, safety, and alignment with user intentions. In this paper, we introduce VERA (Validation and Evaluation of Retrieval-Augmented Systems), a framework designed to enhance the transparency and reliability of outputs from large language models (LLMs) that utilize retrieved information. VERA improves the way we evaluate RAG systems in two important ways: (1) it introduces a cross-encoder based mechanism that encompasses a set of multidimensional metrics into a single comprehensive ranking score, addressing the challenge of prioritizing individual metrics, and (2) it employs Bootstrap statistics on LLM-based metrics across the document repository to establish confidence bounds, ensuring the repositorys topical coverage and improving the overall reliability of retrieval systems. Through several use cases, we demonstrate how VERA can strengthen decision-making processes and trust in AI applications. Our findings not only contribute to the theoretical understanding of LLM-based RAG evaluation metric but also promote the practical implementation of responsible AI systems, marking a significant advancement in the development of reliable and transparent generative AI technologies.

Related papers

• Transparent NLP: Using RAG and LLM Alignment for Privacy Q&A [15.86510147965235]
  General Data Protection Regulation requires precise processing information to be clear and accessible. This paper examines state-of-the-art Retrieval Generation (RAG) systems enhanced with alignment techniques to fulfill obligations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-10T16:42:00Z)
• Towards Trustworthy Retrieval Augmented Generation for Large Language Models: A Survey [92.36487127683053]
  Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) is an advanced technique designed to address the challenges of Artificial Intelligence-Generated Content (AIGC) RAG provides reliable and up-to-date external knowledge, reduces hallucinations, and ensures relevant context across a wide range of tasks. Despite RAG's success and potential, recent studies have shown that the RAG paradigm also introduces new risks, including privacy concerns, adversarial attacks, and accountability issues.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-08T06:50:47Z)
• OmniEval: An Omnidirectional and Automatic RAG Evaluation Benchmark in Financial Domain [62.89809156574998]
  We introduce an omnidirectional and automatic RAG benchmark, OmniEval, in the financial domain. Our benchmark is characterized by its multi-dimensional evaluation framework. Our experiments demonstrate the comprehensiveness of OmniEval, which includes extensive test datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-17T15:38:42Z)
• Semantic Tokens in Retrieval Augmented Generation [0.0]
  I propose a novel Comparative RAG system that introduces an evaluator module to bridge the gap between probabilistic RAG systems and deterministically verifiable responses. This framework paves the way for more reliable and scalable question-answering applications in domains requiring high precision and verifiability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-03T16:52:06Z)
• A Methodology for Evaluating RAG Systems: A Case Study On Configuration Dependency Validation [6.544757635738911]
  Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) is an umbrella of different components, design decisions, and domain-specific adaptations. There is currently no generally accepted methodology for RAG evaluation despite a growing interest in this technology. We propose a first blueprint of a methodology for a sound and reliable evaluation of RAG systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-11T13:36:13Z)
• Trustworthiness in Retrieval-Augmented Generation Systems: A Survey [59.26328612791924]
  Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) has quickly grown into a pivotal paradigm in the development of Large Language Models (LLMs) We propose a unified framework that assesses the trustworthiness of RAG systems across six key dimensions: factuality, robustness, fairness, transparency, accountability, and privacy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-16T09:06:44Z)
• RAGEval: Scenario Specific RAG Evaluation Dataset Generation Framework [69.4501863547618]
  This paper introduces RAGEval, a framework designed to assess RAG systems across diverse scenarios. With a focus on factual accuracy, we propose three novel metrics Completeness, Hallucination, and Irrelevance. Experimental results show that RAGEval outperforms zero-shot and one-shot methods in terms of clarity, safety, conformity, and richness of generated samples.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-02T13:35:11Z)
• Semi-Supervised Multi-Task Learning Based Framework for Power System Security Assessment [0.0]
  This paper develops a novel machine learning-based framework using Semi-Supervised Multi-Task Learning (SS-MTL) for power system dynamic security assessment. The learning algorithm underlying the proposed framework integrates conditional masked encoders and employs multi-task learning for classification-aware feature representation. Various experiments on the IEEE 68-bus system were conducted to validate the proposed method.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-11T22:42:53Z)
• A Thorough Performance Benchmarking on Lightweight Embedding-based Recommender Systems [67.52782366565658]
  State-of-the-art recommender systems (RSs) depend on categorical features, which ecoded by embedding vectors, resulting in excessively large embedding tables. Despite the prosperity of lightweight embedding-based RSs, a wide diversity is seen in evaluation protocols. This study investigates various LERS' performance, efficiency, and cross-task transferability via a thorough benchmarking process.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-25T07:45:00Z)
• REAR: A Relevance-Aware Retrieval-Augmented Framework for Open-Domain Question Answering [115.72130322143275]
  REAR is a RElevance-Aware Retrieval-augmented approach for open-domain question answering (QA) We develop a novel architecture for LLM-based RAG systems, by incorporating a specially designed assessment module. Experiments on four open-domain QA tasks show that REAR significantly outperforms previous a number of competitive RAG approaches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-27T13:22:51Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.