DSBench: How Far Are Data Science Agents to Becoming Data Science Experts?
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2409.07703v1
- Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2024 02:08:00 GMT
- Title: DSBench: How Far Are Data Science Agents to Becoming Data Science Experts?
- Authors: Liqiang Jing, Zhehui Huang, Xiaoyang Wang, Wenlin Yao, Wenhao Yu, Kaixin Ma, Hongming Zhang, Xinya Du, Dong Yu,
- Abstract summary: We introduce DSBench, a benchmark designed to evaluate data science agents with realistic tasks.
This benchmark includes 466 data analysis tasks and 74 data modeling tasks, sourced from Eloquence and Kaggle competitions.
Our evaluation of state-of-the-art LLMs, LVLMs, and agents shows that they struggle with most tasks, with the best agent solving only 34.12% of data analysis tasks and achieving a 34.74% Relative Performance Gap (RPG)
- Score: 58.330879414174476
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) and Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) have demonstrated impressive language/vision reasoning abilities, igniting the recent trend of building agents for targeted applications such as shopping assistants or AI software engineers. Recently, many data science benchmarks have been proposed to investigate their performance in the data science domain. However, existing data science benchmarks still fall short when compared to real-world data science applications due to their simplified settings. To bridge this gap, we introduce DSBench, a comprehensive benchmark designed to evaluate data science agents with realistic tasks. This benchmark includes 466 data analysis tasks and 74 data modeling tasks, sourced from Eloquence and Kaggle competitions. DSBench offers a realistic setting by encompassing long contexts, multimodal task backgrounds, reasoning with large data files and multi-table structures, and performing end-to-end data modeling tasks. Our evaluation of state-of-the-art LLMs, LVLMs, and agents shows that they struggle with most tasks, with the best agent solving only 34.12% of data analysis tasks and achieving a 34.74% Relative Performance Gap (RPG). These findings underscore the need for further advancements in developing more practical, intelligent, and autonomous data science agents.
Related papers
- BabelBench: An Omni Benchmark for Code-Driven Analysis of Multimodal and Multistructured Data [61.936320820180875]
Large language models (LLMs) have become increasingly pivotal across various domains.
BabelBench is an innovative benchmark framework that evaluates the proficiency of LLMs in managing multimodal multistructured data with code execution.
Our experimental findings on BabelBench indicate that even cutting-edge models like ChatGPT 4 exhibit substantial room for improvement.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-01T15:11:24Z) - MMSci: A Dataset for Graduate-Level Multi-Discipline Multimodal Scientific Understanding [59.41495657570397]
This dataset includes figures such as schematic diagrams, simulated images, macroscopic/microscopic photos, and experimental visualizations.
We developed benchmarks for scientific figure captioning and multiple-choice questions, evaluating six proprietary and over ten open-source models.
The dataset and benchmarks will be released to support further research.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-06T00:40:53Z) - DiscoveryBench: Towards Data-Driven Discovery with Large Language Models [50.36636396660163]
We present DiscoveryBench, the first comprehensive benchmark that formalizes the multi-step process of data-driven discovery.
Our benchmark contains 264 tasks collected across 6 diverse domains, such as sociology and engineering.
Our benchmark, thus, illustrates the challenges in autonomous data-driven discovery and serves as a valuable resource for the community to make progress.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-01T18:58:22Z) - CMDBench: A Benchmark for Coarse-to-fine Multimodal Data Discovery in Compound AI Systems [10.71630696651595]
Compound AI systems (CASs) that employ LLMs as agents to accomplish knowledge-intensive tasks have garnered significant interest within database and AI communities.
silos of multimodal data sources make it difficult to identify appropriate data sources for accomplishing the task at hand.
We propose CMDBench, a benchmark modeling the complexity of enterprise data platforms.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-02T01:10:41Z) - DataAgent: Evaluating Large Language Models' Ability to Answer Zero-Shot, Natural Language Queries [0.0]
We evaluate OpenAI's GPT-3.5 as a "Language Data Scientist" (LDS)
The model was tested on a diverse set of benchmark datasets to evaluate its performance across multiple standards.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-29T22:59:34Z) - Data Interpreter: An LLM Agent For Data Science [43.13678782387546]
Large Language Model (LLM)-based agents have shown effectiveness across many applications.
However, their use in data science scenarios requiring solving long-term interconnected tasks, dynamic data adjustments and domain expertise remains challenging.
We present Data Interpreter, an LLM-based agent designed to automatically solve various data science problems end-to-end.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-28T19:49:55Z) - Are LLMs Capable of Data-based Statistical and Causal Reasoning? Benchmarking Advanced Quantitative Reasoning with Data [89.2410799619405]
We introduce the Quantitative Reasoning with Data benchmark to evaluate Large Language Models' capability in statistical and causal reasoning with real-world data.
The benchmark comprises a dataset of 411 questions accompanied by data sheets from textbooks, online learning materials, and academic papers.
To compare models' quantitative reasoning abilities on data and text, we enrich the benchmark with an auxiliary set of 290 text-only questions, namely QRText.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-27T16:15:03Z) - MatPlotAgent: Method and Evaluation for LLM-Based Agentic Scientific Data Visualization [86.61052121715689]
MatPlotAgent is a model-agnostic framework designed to automate scientific data visualization tasks.
MatPlotBench is a high-quality benchmark consisting of 100 human-verified test cases.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-18T04:28:28Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.