A Reinforcement Learning Environment for Automatic Code Optimization in the MLIR Compiler

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2409.11068v1
• Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2024 10:49:45 GMT
• Title: A Reinforcement Learning Environment for Automatic Code Optimization in the MLIR Compiler
• Authors: Nazim Bendib, Iheb Nassim Aouadj, Riyadh Baghdadi,
• Abstract summary: We introduce the first RL environment for the MLIR compiler, dedicated to facilitating MLIR compiler research. We also propose a novel formulation of the action space as a product of simpler action subspaces, enabling more efficient and effective optimizations.
• Score: 0.10923877073891444
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Code optimization is a crucial task aimed at enhancing code performance. However, this process is often tedious and complex, highlighting the necessity for automatic code optimization techniques. Reinforcement Learning (RL), a machine learning technique, has emerged as a promising approach for tackling such complex optimization problems. In this project, we introduce the first RL environment for the MLIR compiler, dedicated to facilitating MLIR compiler research, and enabling automatic code optimization using Multi-Action Reinforcement Learning. We also propose a novel formulation of the action space as a Cartesian product of simpler action subspaces, enabling more efficient and effective optimizations. Experimental results demonstrate that our proposed environment allows for an effective optimization of MLIR operations, and yields comparable performance to TensorFlow, surpassing it in multiple cases, highlighting the potential of RL-based optimization in compiler frameworks.

Related papers

• Improving Existing Optimization Algorithms with LLMs [0.9668407688201361]
  This paper investigates how Large Language Models (LLMs) can enhance existing optimization algorithms. Using their pre-trained knowledge, we demonstrate their ability to propose innovative variations and implementation strategies. Our results show that an alternative proposed by GPT-4o outperforms the expert-designed of CMSA.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-12T10:58:57Z)
• Optimizing Code Runtime Performance through Context-Aware Retrieval-Augmented Generation [8.574686422653345]
  Auto achieves a 7.3% improvement in execution efficiency over GPT-4o across common generated executable code. This study introduces an in-context learning approach designed to bridge the gap by enabling LLMs to automatically generate optimized code.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-28T04:00:35Z)
• LLM-based Optimization of Compound AI Systems: A Survey [64.39860384538338]
  In a compound AI system, components such as an LLM call, a retriever, a code interpreter, or tools are interconnected. Recent advancements enable end-to-end optimization of these parameters using an LLM. This paper presents a survey of the principles and emerging trends in LLM-based optimization of compound AI systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-21T18:06:25Z)
• A Problem-Oriented Perspective and Anchor Verification for Code Optimization [43.28045750932116]
  Large language models (LLMs) have shown remarkable capabilities in solving various programming tasks. This paper investigates the capabilities of LLMs in optimizing code for minimal execution time.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-17T16:10:10Z)
• Primitive Agentic First-Order Optimization [0.0]
  This work presents a proof-of-concept study combining primitive state representations and agent-environment interactions as first-order reinforcement learning. The results show that elementary RL methods combined with succinct partial state representations can be used as optimizeds manage complexity in RL-based optimization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-07T11:13:38Z)
• LLM as a Complementary Optimizer to Gradient Descent: A Case Study in Prompt Tuning [69.95292905263393]
  We show that gradient-based and high-level LLMs can effectively collaborate a combined optimization framework. In this paper, we show that these complementary to each other and can effectively collaborate a combined optimization framework.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-30T06:24:14Z)
• CompilerDream: Learning a Compiler World Model for General Code Optimization [58.87557583347996]
  We introduce CompilerDream, a model-based reinforcement learning approach to general code optimization. It comprises a compiler world model that accurately simulates the intrinsic properties of optimization passes and an agent trained on this model to produce effective optimization strategies. It excels across diverse datasets, surpassing LLVM's built-in optimizations and other state-of-the-art methods in both settings of value prediction and end-to-end code optimization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-24T09:20:33Z)
• Revisiting Zeroth-Order Optimization for Memory-Efficient LLM Fine-Tuning: A Benchmark [166.40879020706151]
  This paper proposes a shift towards BP-free, zeroth-order (ZO) optimization as a solution for reducing memory costs during fine-tuning. Unlike traditional ZO-SGD methods, our work expands the exploration to a wider array of ZO optimization techniques. Our study unveils previously overlooked optimization principles, highlighting the importance of task alignment, the role of the forward gradient method, and the balance between algorithm complexity and fine-tuning performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-18T14:08:48Z)
• An Empirical Evaluation of Zeroth-Order Optimization Methods on AI-driven Molecule Optimization [78.36413169647408]
  We study the effectiveness of various ZO optimization methods for optimizing molecular objectives. We show the advantages of ZO sign-based gradient descent (ZO-signGD) We demonstrate the potential effectiveness of ZO optimization methods on widely used benchmark tasks from the Guacamol suite.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-27T01:58:10Z)
• Multi-Objective Hyperparameter Optimization in Machine Learning -- An Overview [10.081056751778712]
  We introduce the basics of multi-objective hyperparameter optimization and motivate its usefulness in applied ML. We provide an extensive survey of existing optimization strategies, both from the domain of evolutionary algorithms and Bayesian optimization. We illustrate the utility of MOO in several specific ML applications, considering objectives such as operating conditions, prediction time, sparseness, fairness, interpretability and robustness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-15T10:23:19Z)
• Learning to Superoptimize Real-world Programs [79.4140991035247]
  We propose a framework to learn to superoptimize real-world programs by using neural sequence-to-sequence models. We introduce the Big Assembly benchmark, a dataset consisting of over 25K real-world functions mined from open-source projects in x86-64 assembly.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-28T05:33:21Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.