VisScience: An Extensive Benchmark for Evaluating K12 Educational Multi-modal Scientific Reasoning

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2409.13730v2
• Date: Mon, 02 Dec 2024 15:11:23 GMT
• Title: VisScience: An Extensive Benchmark for Evaluating K12 Educational Multi-modal Scientific Reasoning
• Authors: Zhihuan Jiang, Zhen Yang, Jinhao Chen, Zhengxiao Du, Weihan Wang, Bin Xu, Jie Tang,
• Abstract summary: Multi-modal large language models (MLLMs) have demonstrated promising capabilities across various tasks. We present a detailed evaluation of the performance of 25 representative MLLMs in scientific reasoning. The best performance observed include a 53.4% accuracy in mathematics by Claude3.5-Sonnet, 38.2% in physics by GPT-4o, and 47.0% in chemistry by Gemini-1.5-Pro.
• Score: 20.56989082014445
• License:
• Abstract: Multi-modal large language models (MLLMs) have demonstrated promising capabilities across various tasks by integrating textual and visual information to achieve visual understanding in complex scenarios. Despite the availability of several benchmarks aims to evaluating MLLMs in tasks from visual question answering to complex problem-solving, most focus predominantly on mathematics or general visual understanding tasks. This reveals a critical gap in current benchmarks, which often overlook the inclusion of other key scientific disciplines such as physics and chemistry. To address this gap, we meticulously construct a comprehensive benchmark, named VisScience, which is utilized to assess the multi-modal scientific reasoning across the three disciplines of mathematics, physics, and chemistry. This benchmark comprises 3,000 questions drawn from K12 education - spanning elementary school through high school - equally distributed across three disciplines, with 1,000 questions per discipline. The questions within VisScience span 21 distinct subjects and are categorized into five difficulty levels, offering a broad spectrum of topics within each discipline. With VisScience, we present a detailed evaluation of the performance of 25 representative MLLMs in scientific reasoning. Experimental results demonstrate that closed-source MLLMs generally outperform open-source models. The best performance observed include a 53.4\% accuracy in mathematics by Claude3.5-Sonnet, 38.2\% in physics by GPT-4o, and 47.0\% in chemistry by Gemini-1.5-Pro. These results underscore the strengths and limitations of MLLMs, suggesting areas for future improvement and highlighting the importance of developing models that can effectively handle the diverse demands of multi-modal scientific reasoning.

Related papers

• SuperGPQA: Scaling LLM Evaluation across 285 Graduate Disciplines [122.04298386571692]
  Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable proficiency in academic disciplines such as mathematics, physics, and computer science. However, human knowledge encompasses over 200 specialized disciplines, far exceeding the scope of existing benchmarks. We present SuperGPQA, a benchmark that evaluates graduate-level knowledge and reasoning capabilities across 285 disciplines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-20T17:05:58Z)
• Position: Multimodal Large Language Models Can Significantly Advance Scientific Reasoning [51.11965014462375]
  Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) integrate text, images, and other modalities. This paper argues that MLLMs can significantly advance scientific reasoning across disciplines such as mathematics, physics, chemistry, and biology.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-05T04:05:27Z)
• A Survey of Mathematical Reasoning in the Era of Multimodal Large Language Model: Benchmark, Method & Challenges [25.82535441866882]
  This survey provides the first comprehensive analysis of mathematical reasoning in the era of multimodal large language models (MLLMs) We review over 200 studies published since 2021, and examine the state-of-the-art developments in Math-LLMs. In particular, we explore multimodal mathematical reasoning pipeline, as well as the role of (M)LLMs and the associated methodologies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-16T16:21:41Z)
• Polymath: A Challenging Multi-modal Mathematical Reasoning Benchmark [53.61633384281524]
  PolyMATH is a benchmark aimed at evaluating the general cognitive reasoning abilities of MLLMs. The best scores achieved on PolyMATH are 41%, 36%, and 27%, obtained by Claude-3.5 Sonnet, GPT-4o and Gemini-1.5 Pro respectively. A further fine-grained error analysis reveals that these models struggle to understand spatial relations and perform drawn-out, high-level reasoning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-06T20:35:41Z)
• ErrorRadar: Benchmarking Complex Mathematical Reasoning of Multimodal Large Language Models Via Error Detection [60.297079601066784]
  We introduce ErrorRadar, the first benchmark designed to assess MLLMs' capabilities in error detection. ErrorRadar evaluates two sub-tasks: error step identification and error categorization. It consists of 2,500 high-quality multimodal K-12 mathematical problems, collected from real-world student interactions. Results indicate significant challenges still remain, as GPT-4o with best performance is still around 10% behind human evaluation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-06T14:59:09Z)
• A Comprehensive Survey of Scientific Large Language Models and Their Applications in Scientific Discovery [68.48094108571432]
  Large language models (LLMs) have revolutionized the way text and other modalities of data are handled. We aim to provide a more holistic view of the research landscape by unveiling cross-field and cross-modal connections between scientific LLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-16T08:03:24Z)
• SceMQA: A Scientific College Entrance Level Multimodal Question Answering Benchmark [42.91902601376494]
  The paper introduces SceMQA, a novel benchmark for scientific multimodal question answering at the college entrance level. SceMQA focuses on core science subjects including Mathematics, Physics, Chemistry, and Biology. It features a blend of multiple-choice and free-response formats, ensuring a comprehensive evaluation of AI models' abilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-06T19:16:55Z)
• SciBench: Evaluating College-Level Scientific Problem-Solving Abilities of Large Language Models [70.5763210869525]
  We introduce an expansive benchmark suite SciBench for Large Language Model (LLM) SciBench contains a dataset featuring a range of collegiate-level scientific problems from mathematics, chemistry, and physics domains. The results reveal that the current LLMs fall short of delivering satisfactory performance, with the best overall score of merely 43.22%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-20T07:01:57Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.