Reward-Robust RLHF in LLMs

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2409.15360v3
• Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2024 14:56:15 GMT
• Title: Reward-Robust RLHF in LLMs
• Authors: Yuzi Yan, Xingzhou Lou, Jialian Li, Yiping Zhang, Jian Xie, Chao Yu, Yu Wang, Dong Yan, Yuan Shen,
• Abstract summary: Large Language Models (LLMs) continue to progress toward more advanced forms of intelligence. The reliance on reward-model-based (RM-based) alignment methods introduces significant challenges. We introduce a reward-robust RLHF framework aimed at addressing these fundamental challenges.
• Score: 25.31456438114974
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: As Large Language Models (LLMs) continue to progress toward more advanced forms of intelligence, Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) is increasingly seen as a key pathway toward achieving Artificial General Intelligence (AGI). However, the reliance on reward-model-based (RM-based) alignment methods introduces significant challenges due to the inherent instability and imperfections of Reward Models (RMs), which can lead to critical issues such as reward hacking and misalignment with human intentions. In this paper, we introduce a reward-robust RLHF framework aimed at addressing these fundamental challenges, paving the way for more reliable and resilient learning in LLMs. Our approach introduces a novel optimization objective that carefully balances performance and robustness by incorporating Bayesian Reward Model Ensembles (BRME) to model the uncertainty set of reward functions. This allows the framework to integrate both nominal performance and minimum reward signals, ensuring more stable learning even with imperfect RMs. Empirical results demonstrate that our framework consistently outperforms baselines across diverse benchmarks, showing improved accuracy and long-term stability. We also provide a theoretical analysis, demonstrating that reward-robust RLHF approaches the stability of constant reward settings, which proves to be acceptable even in a stochastic-case analysis. Together, these contributions highlight the framework potential to enhance both the performance and stability of LLM alignment.

Related papers

• Self-Consistency of the Internal Reward Models Improves Self-Rewarding Language Models [63.116041268654705]
  We find that different internal reward models within the same Large Language Models often generate inconsistent preferences. This inconsistency raises concerns about the reliability of self-generated preference data, hinders overall alignment performance, and highlights the need for further research. We propose Self-Consistent Internal Rewards (SCIR), a novel framework designed to enhance consistency among internal reward models during training.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-13T03:15:31Z)
• Reusing Embeddings: Reproducible Reward Model Research in Large Language Model Alignment without GPUs [58.18140409409302]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have made substantial strides in structured tasks through Reinforcement Learning (RL) Applying RL in broader domains like chatbots and content generation presents unique challenges. We show a case study of reproducing existing reward model ensemble research using embedding-based reward models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-04T19:37:35Z)
• Beyond Reward Hacking: Causal Rewards for Large Language Model Alignment [30.605500809158986]
  We propose a novel causal reward modeling approach that integrates causal inference to mitigate spurious correlations. Our approach mitigates various types of spurious correlations effectively, resulting in more reliable and fair alignment of LLMs with human preferences.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-16T16:00:37Z)
• Insights from the Inverse: Reconstructing LLM Training Goals Through Inverse RL [7.988692259455583]
  Large language models (LLMs) trained with Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback have demonstrated remarkable capabilities, but their underlying reward functions and decision-making processes remain opaque. This paper introduces a novel approach to interpreting LLMs by applying inverse reinforcement learning (IRL) to recover their implicit reward functions. We conduct experiments on toxicity-aligned LLMs of varying sizes, extracting reward models that achieve up to 80.40% accuracy in predicting human preferences.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-16T12:14:25Z)
• Uncertainty-aware Reward Model: Teaching Reward Models to Know What is Unknown [20.753374166695494]
  We introduce the Uncertainty-aware Reward Model (URM) and its ensemble variant, URME. URM employs a probabilistic value head to capture aleatoric uncertainty by modeling the distribution of disentangled human preference attributes. URME further quantifies uncertainty by examining discrepancies among individual URMs within the ensemble, enabling identification of unreliable evaluations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-01T16:29:59Z)
• Take the Bull by the Horns: Hard Sample-Reweighted Continual Training Improves LLM Generalization [165.98557106089777]
  A key challenge is to enhance the capabilities of large language models (LLMs) amid a looming shortage of high-quality training data. Our study starts from an empirical strategy for the light continual training of LLMs using their original pre-training data sets. We then formalize this strategy into a principled framework of Instance-Reweighted Distributionally Robust Optimization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-22T04:10:57Z)
• WARM: On the Benefits of Weight Averaged Reward Models [63.08179139233774]
  We propose Weight Averaged Reward Models (WARM) to mitigate reward hacking. Experiments on summarization tasks, using best-of-N and RL methods, shows that WARM improves the overall quality and alignment of LLM predictions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-22T18:27:08Z)
• Let's Reinforce Step by Step [10.65244642965387]
  We use Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback to shape model reasoning processes. Our results show that the fine-grained reward provided by PRM-based methods enhances accuracy on simple mathematical reasoning. We also show the critical role reward aggregation functions play in model performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-10T01:35:51Z)
• Let's reward step by step: Step-Level reward model as the Navigators for Reasoning [64.27898739929734]
  Process-Supervised Reward Model (PRM) furnishes LLMs with step-by-step feedback during the training phase. We propose a greedy search algorithm that employs the step-level feedback from PRM to optimize the reasoning pathways explored by LLMs. To explore the versatility of our approach, we develop a novel method to automatically generate step-level reward dataset for coding tasks and observed similar improved performance in the code generation tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-16T05:21:50Z)
• SALMON: Self-Alignment with Instructable Reward Models [80.83323636730341]
  This paper presents a novel approach, namely SALMON, to align base language models with minimal human supervision. We develop an AI assistant named Dromedary-2 with only 6 exemplars for in-context learning and 31 human-defined principles.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-09T17:56:53Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.