Empirical Insights on Fine-Tuning Large Language Models for Question-Answering

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2409.15825v1
• Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2024 07:38:38 GMT
• Title: Empirical Insights on Fine-Tuning Large Language Models for Question-Answering
• Authors: Junjie Ye, Yuming Yang, Qi Zhang, Tao Gui, Xuanjing Huang, Peng Wang, Zhongchao Shi, Jianping Fan,
• Abstract summary: Large language models (LLMs) encode extensive world knowledge through pre-training on massive datasets, which can be fine-tuned for the question-answering (QA) task. We categorize supervised fine-tuning (SFT) data based on the extent of knowledge memorized by the pretrained LLMs. Our experiments show that as few as 60 data points during the SFT stage can activate the knowledge encoded during pre-training, enabling LLMs to perform the QA task.
• Score: 50.12622877002846
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) encode extensive world knowledge through pre-training on massive datasets, which can then be fine-tuned for the question-answering (QA) task. However, effective strategies for fine-tuning LLMs for the QA task remain largely unexplored. To address this gap, we categorize supervised fine-tuning (SFT) data based on the extent of knowledge memorized by the pretrained LLMs and conduct a series of empirical analyses. Our experiments, involving four LLMs from three different model families, focus on three key factors: the amount of data required for SFT, the impact of different SFT datasets on model performance, and how data requirements vary across LLMs. The results show that as few as 60 data points during the SFT stage can activate the knowledge encoded during pre-training, enabling LLMs to perform the QA task. Additionally, SFT with data of varying memory levels has a significant impact on LLM performance, with the optimal dataset differing based on the specific model being fine-tuned. Future research will delve deeper into the mechanisms underlying these phenomena.

Related papers

• SFTMix: Elevating Language Model Instruction Tuning with Mixup Recipe [30.03925858123481]
  We propose SFTMix, a novel recipe that elevates instruction-tuning performance beyond the conventional NTP paradigm. Based on training dynamics, we argue that examples with different confidence levels should play distinct roles during the instruction-tuning process. This approach enables SFTMix to significantly outperform NTP across a wide range of instruction-following and healthcare domain-specific SFT tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-07T17:52:21Z)
• SELF-GUIDE: Better Task-Specific Instruction Following via Self-Synthetic Finetuning [70.21358720599821]
  Large language models (LLMs) hold the promise of solving diverse tasks when provided with appropriate natural language prompts. We propose SELF-GUIDE, a multi-stage mechanism in which we synthesize task-specific input-output pairs from the student LLM. We report an absolute improvement of approximately 15% for classification tasks and 18% for generation tasks in the benchmark's metrics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-16T04:41:58Z)
• Unveiling the Impact of Coding Data Instruction Fine-Tuning on Large Language Models Reasoning [64.5243480989869]
  Instruction Fine-Tuning (IFT) significantly enhances the zero-shot capabilities of pretrained Large Language Models (LLMs) This paper investigates how coding data impact LLMs' reasoning capacities during the IFT stage.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-30T23:20:25Z)
• LLM2LLM: Boosting LLMs with Novel Iterative Data Enhancement [79.31084387589968]
  Pretrained large language models (LLMs) are currently state-of-the-art for solving the vast majority of natural language processing tasks. We propose LLM2LLM, a data augmentation strategy that uses a teacher LLM to enhance a small seed dataset. We achieve improvements up to 24.2% on the GSM8K dataset, 32.6% on CaseHOLD, 32.0% on SNIPS, 52.6% on TREC and 39.8% on SST-2 over regular fine-tuning in the low-data regime.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-22T08:57:07Z)
• Ziya2: Data-centric Learning is All LLMs Need [41.44909548662012]
  We propose Ziya2, a model with 13 billion parameters adopting LLaMA2 as the foundation model, and further pre-trained on 700 billion tokens. Experiments show that Ziya2 significantly outperforms other models in multiple benchmarks especially with promising results compared to representative open-source ones.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-06T17:49:34Z)
• FederatedScope-LLM: A Comprehensive Package for Fine-tuning Large Language Models in Federated Learning [70.38817963253034]
  This paper first discusses these challenges of federated fine-tuning LLMs, and introduces our package FS-LLM as a main contribution. We provide comprehensive federated parameter-efficient fine-tuning algorithm implementations and versatile programming interfaces for future extension in FL scenarios. We conduct extensive experiments to validate the effectiveness of FS-LLM and benchmark advanced LLMs with state-of-the-art parameter-efficient fine-tuning algorithms in FL settings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-01T09:40:36Z)
• Large Language Models as Data Preprocessors [9.99065004972981]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have marked a significant advancement in artificial intelligence. This study explores their potential in data preprocessing, a critical stage in data mining and analytics applications. We propose an LLM-based framework for data preprocessing, which integrates cutting-edge prompt engineering techniques.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-30T23:28:43Z)
• To Repeat or Not To Repeat: Insights from Scaling LLM under Token-Crisis [50.31589712761807]
  Large language models (LLMs) are notoriously token-hungry during pre-training, and high-quality text data on the web is approaching its scaling limit for LLMs. We investigate the consequences of repeating pre-training data, revealing that the model is susceptible to overfitting. Second, we examine the key factors contributing to multi-epoch degradation, finding that significant factors include dataset size, model parameters, and training objectives.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-22T17:02:15Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.