LLM With Tools: A Survey
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2409.18807v1
- Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2024 14:08:11 GMT
- Title: LLM With Tools: A Survey
- Authors: Zhuocheng Shen,
- Abstract summary: This paper delves into the methodology,challenges, and developments in the realm of teaching LLMs to use external tools.
We introduce a standardized paradigm for tool integration guided by a series of functions that map user instructions to actionable plans.
Our exploration reveals the various challenges encountered, such as tool invocation timing, selection accuracy, and the need for robust reasoning processes.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: The integration of tools in augmenting large language models presents a novel approach toward enhancing the efficiency and accuracy of these models in handling specific, complex tasks. This paper delves into the methodology,challenges, and developments in the realm of teaching LLMs to use external tools, thereby pushing the boundaries of their capabilities beyond pre-existing knowledge bases. We introduce a standardized paradigm for tool integration guided by a series of functions that map user instructions to actionable plans and their execution, emphasizing the significance of understanding user intent, tool selection, and dynamic plan adjustment. Our exploration reveals the various challenges encountered, such as tool invocation timing, selection accuracy, and the need for robust reasoning processes. In addressing these challenges, we investigate techniques within the context of fine-tuning and incontext learning paradigms, highlighting innovative approaches to ensure diversity, augment datasets, and improve generalization.Furthermore, we investigate a perspective on enabling LLMs to not only utilize but also autonomously create tools, which may redefine their role from mere tool users to tool creators. Finally,we reproduced Chameleon's results on ScienceQA and analyzed the code structure.
Related papers
- Adaptive Tool Use in Large Language Models with Meta-Cognition Trigger [49.81945268343162]
We propose MeCo, an adaptive decision-making strategy for external tool use.
MeCo captures high-level cognitive signals in the representation space, guiding when to invoke tools.
Our experiments show that MeCo accurately detects LLMs' internal cognitive signals and significantly improves tool-use decision-making.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-18T15:45:01Z) - From Exploration to Mastery: Enabling LLMs to Master Tools via Self-Driven Interactions [60.733557487886635]
This paper focuses on bridging the comprehension gap between Large Language Models and external tools.
We propose a novel framework, DRAFT, aimed at Dynamically refining tool documentation.
Extensive experiments on multiple datasets demonstrate that DRAFT's iterative, feedback-based refinement significantly ameliorates documentation quality.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-10T17:58:44Z) - MetaTool: Facilitating Large Language Models to Master Tools with Meta-task Augmentation [25.360660222418183]
We present MetaTool, a novel tool learning methodology designed to generalize across any reusable toolset.
By incorporating meta-task data into task-oriented training, our method significantly enhances the performance of open-source Large Language Models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-15T10:15:41Z) - Tool Learning with Large Language Models: A Survey [60.733557487886635]
Tool learning with large language models (LLMs) has emerged as a promising paradigm for augmenting the capabilities of LLMs to tackle highly complex problems.
Despite growing attention and rapid advancements in this field, the existing literature remains fragmented and lacks systematic organization.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-28T08:01:26Z) - Chain of Tools: Large Language Model is an Automatic Multi-tool Learner [54.992464510992605]
Automatic Tool Chain (ATC) is a framework that enables the large language models (LLMs) to act as a multi-tool user.
To scale up the scope of the tools, we next propose a black-box probing method.
For a comprehensive evaluation, we build a challenging benchmark named ToolFlow.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-26T11:40:58Z) - Towards Completeness-Oriented Tool Retrieval for Large Language Models [60.733557487886635]
Real-world systems often incorporate a wide array of tools, making it impractical to input all tools into Large Language Models.
Existing tool retrieval methods primarily focus on semantic matching between user queries and tool descriptions.
We propose a novel modelagnostic COllaborative Learning-based Tool Retrieval approach, COLT, which captures not only the semantic similarities between user queries and tool descriptions but also takes into account the collaborative information of tools.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-25T06:41:23Z) - Planning and Editing What You Retrieve for Enhanced Tool Learning [31.963485987789852]
This paper introduces a novel PLUTO (Planning, Learning, and Understanding for TOols) approach, encompassing Plan-and-Retrieve (P&R) and Edit-and-Ground (E&G) paradigms.
Experiment results demonstrate that these paradigms significantly improve the recall and NDCG in tool retrieval tasks, significantly surpassing current state-of-the-art models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-30T18:41:51Z) - Look Before You Leap: Towards Decision-Aware and Generalizable Tool-Usage for Large Language Models [26.28459880766842]
We propose a decision-aware and generalizable tool-usage framework (DEER)
Specifically, we first construct the tool-usage samples with multiple decision branches via an automatic generation pipeline.
Our proposed DEER is effective and significantly outperforms baselines across various datasets.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-26T16:11:03Z) - CREATOR: Tool Creation for Disentangling Abstract and Concrete Reasoning of Large Language Models [74.22729793816451]
Large Language Models (LLMs) have made significant progress in utilizing tools, but their ability is limited by API availability.
We propose CREATOR, a novel framework that enables LLMs to create their own tools using documentation and code realization.
We evaluate CREATOR on MATH and TabMWP benchmarks, respectively consisting of challenging math competition problems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-23T17:51:52Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.