Jailbreak Antidote: Runtime Safety-Utility Balance via Sparse Representation Adjustment in Large Language Models
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2410.02298v4
- Date: Fri, 07 Feb 2025 06:23:17 GMT
- Title: Jailbreak Antidote: Runtime Safety-Utility Balance via Sparse Representation Adjustment in Large Language Models
- Authors: Guobin Shen, Dongcheng Zhao, Yiting Dong, Xiang He, Yi Zeng,
- Abstract summary: Jailbreak attacks manipulate large language models into generating harmful content.
Jailbreak Antidote enables real-time adjustment of safety preferences by manipulating a sparse subset of the model's internal states.
Our analysis reveals that safety-related information in LLMs is sparsely distributed.
- Score: 8.024771725860127
- License:
- Abstract: As large language models (LLMs) become integral to various applications, ensuring both their safety and utility is paramount. Jailbreak attacks, which manipulate LLMs into generating harmful content, pose significant challenges to this balance. Existing defenses, such as prompt engineering and safety fine-tuning, often introduce computational overhead, increase inference latency, and lack runtime flexibility. Moreover, overly restrictive safety measures can degrade model utility by causing refusals of benign queries. In this paper, we introduce Jailbreak Antidote, a method that enables real-time adjustment of LLM safety preferences by manipulating a sparse subset of the model's internal states during inference. By shifting the model's hidden representations along a safety direction with varying strengths, we achieve flexible control over the safety-utility balance without additional token overhead or inference delays. Our analysis reveals that safety-related information in LLMs is sparsely distributed; adjusting approximately 5% of the internal state is as effective as modifying the entire state. Extensive experiments on nine LLMs (ranging from 2 billion to 72 billion parameters), evaluated against ten jailbreak attack methods and compared with six defense strategies, validate the effectiveness and efficiency of our approach. By directly manipulating internal states during reasoning, Jailbreak Antidote offers a lightweight, scalable solution that enhances LLM safety while preserving utility, opening new possibilities for real-time safety mechanisms in widely-deployed AI systems.
Related papers
- DELMAN: Dynamic Defense Against Large Language Model Jailbreaking with Model Editing [62.43110639295449]
Large Language Models (LLMs) are widely applied in decision making, but their deployment is threatened by jailbreak attacks.
Delman is a novel approach leveraging direct model editing for precise, dynamic protection against jailbreak attacks.
Delman directly updates a minimal set of relevant parameters to neutralize harmful behaviors while preserving the model's utility.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-17T10:39:21Z) - Internal Activation as the Polar Star for Steering Unsafe LLM Behavior [50.463399903987245]
We introduce SafeSwitch, a framework that dynamically regulates unsafe outputs by monitoring and utilizing the model's internal states.
Our empirical results show that SafeSwitch reduces harmful outputs by over 80% on safety benchmarks while maintaining strong utility.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-03T04:23:33Z) - Shaping the Safety Boundaries: Understanding and Defending Against Jailbreaks in Large Language Models [59.25318174362368]
Jailbreaking in Large Language Models (LLMs) is a major security concern as it can deceive LLMs to generate harmful text.
We conduct a detailed analysis of seven different jailbreak methods and find that disagreements stem from insufficient observation samples.
We propose a novel defense called textbfActivation Boundary Defense (ABD), which adaptively constrains the activations within the safety boundary.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-12-22T14:18:39Z) - Immune: Improving Safety Against Jailbreaks in Multi-modal LLMs via Inference-Time Alignment [97.38766396447369]
Despite training-time safety alignment, MLLMs remain vulnerable to jailbreak attacks.
We propose Immune, an inference-time defense framework that leverages a safe reward model to defend against jailbreak attacks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-11-27T19:00:10Z) - Harnessing Task Overload for Scalable Jailbreak Attacks on Large Language Models [8.024771725860127]
Large Language Models (LLMs) remain vulnerable to jailbreak attacks that bypass their safety mechanisms.
We introduce a novel scalable jailbreak attack that preempts the activation of an LLM's safety policies by occupying its computational resources.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-05T15:10:01Z) - LLMs can be Dangerous Reasoners: Analyzing-based Jailbreak Attack on Large Language Models [21.02295266675853]
Existing jailbreak methods suffer from two main limitations: reliance on complicated prompt engineering and iterative optimization.
We propose an efficient jailbreak attack method, Analyzing-based Jailbreak (ABJ), which leverages the advanced reasoning capability of LLMs to autonomously generate harmful content.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-23T06:14:41Z) - Refuse Whenever You Feel Unsafe: Improving Safety in LLMs via Decoupled Refusal Training [67.30423823744506]
This study addresses a critical gap in safety tuning practices for Large Language Models (LLMs)
We introduce a novel approach, Decoupled Refusal Training (DeRTa), designed to empower LLMs to refuse compliance to harmful prompts at any response position.
DeRTa incorporates two novel components: (1) Maximum Likelihood Estimation with Harmful Response Prefix, which trains models to recognize and avoid unsafe content by appending a segment of harmful response to the beginning of a safe response, and (2) Reinforced Transition Optimization (RTO), which equips models with the ability to transition from potential harm to safety refusal consistently throughout the harmful
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-12T09:36:33Z) - Defensive Prompt Patch: A Robust and Interpretable Defense of LLMs against Jailbreak Attacks [59.46556573924901]
This paper introduces Defensive Prompt Patch (DPP), a novel prompt-based defense mechanism for large language models (LLMs)
Unlike previous approaches, DPP is designed to achieve a minimal Attack Success Rate (ASR) while preserving the high utility of LLMs.
Empirical results conducted on LLAMA-2-7B-Chat and Mistral-7B-Instruct-v0.2 models demonstrate the robustness and adaptability of DPP.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-30T14:40:35Z) - Fine-Tuning, Quantization, and LLMs: Navigating Unintended Outcomes [0.0]
Large Language Models (LLMs) have gained widespread adoption across various domains, including chatbots and auto-task completion agents.
These models are susceptible to safety vulnerabilities such as jailbreaking, prompt injection, and privacy leakage attacks.
This study investigates the impact of these modifications on LLM safety, a critical consideration for building reliable and secure AI systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-05T20:31:45Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.