HiReview: Hierarchical Taxonomy-Driven Automatic Literature Review Generation

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2410.03761v1
• Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2024 13:02:03 GMT
• Title: HiReview: Hierarchical Taxonomy-Driven Automatic Literature Review Generation
• Authors: Yuntong Hu, Zhuofeng Li, Zheng Zhang, Chen Ling, Raasikh Kanjiani, Boxin Zhao, Liang Zhao,
• Abstract summary: HiReview is a novel framework for hierarchical taxonomy-driven automatic literature review generation. Extensive experiments demonstrate that HiReview significantly outperforms state-of-the-art methods.
• Score: 15.188580557890942
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: In this work, we present HiReview, a novel framework for hierarchical taxonomy-driven automatic literature review generation. With the exponential growth of academic documents, manual literature reviews have become increasingly labor-intensive and time-consuming, while traditional summarization models struggle to generate comprehensive document reviews effectively. Large language models (LLMs), with their powerful text processing capabilities, offer a potential solution; however, research on incorporating LLMs for automatic document generation remains limited. To address key challenges in large-scale automatic literature review generation (LRG), we propose a two-stage taxonomy-then-generation approach that combines graph-based hierarchical clustering with retrieval-augmented LLMs. First, we retrieve the most relevant sub-community within the citation network, then generate a hierarchical taxonomy tree by clustering papers based on both textual content and citation relationships. In the second stage, an LLM generates coherent and contextually accurate summaries for clusters or topics at each hierarchical level, ensuring comprehensive coverage and logical organization of the literature. Extensive experiments demonstrate that HiReview significantly outperforms state-of-the-art methods, achieving superior hierarchical organization, content relevance, and factual accuracy in automatic literature review generation tasks.

Related papers

• Integrating Planning into Single-Turn Long-Form Text Generation [66.08871753377055]
  We propose to use planning to generate long form content. Our main novelty lies in a single auxiliary task that does not require multiple rounds of prompting or planning. Our experiments demonstrate on two datasets from different domains, that LLMs fine-tuned with the auxiliary task generate higher quality documents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-08T17:02:40Z)
• Are Large Language Models Good Classifiers? A Study on Edit Intent Classification in Scientific Document Revisions [62.12545440385489]
  Large language models (LLMs) have brought substantial advancements in text generation, but their potential for enhancing classification tasks remains underexplored. We propose a framework for thoroughly investigating fine-tuning LLMs for classification, including both generation- and encoding-based approaches. We instantiate this framework in edit intent classification (EIC), a challenging and underexplored classification task.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-02T20:48:28Z)
• Meta Knowledge for Retrieval Augmented Large Language Models [0.0]
  We introduce a novel data-centric RAG workflow for Large Language Models (LLMs) Our methodology relies on generating metadata and synthetic Questions and Answers (QA) for each document. We demonstrate that using augmented queries with synthetic question matching significantly outperforms traditional RAG pipelines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-16T20:55:21Z)
• CHIME: LLM-Assisted Hierarchical Organization of Scientific Studies for Literature Review Support [31.327873791724326]
  Literature review requires researchers to synthesize a large amount of information and is increasingly challenging as the scientific literature expands. In this work, we investigate the potential of LLMs for producing hierarchical organizations of scientific studies to assist researchers with literature review.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-23T03:18:00Z)
• Ground Every Sentence: Improving Retrieval-Augmented LLMs with Interleaved Reference-Claim Generation [51.8188846284153]
  RAG has been widely adopted to enhance Large Language Models (LLMs) Attributed Text Generation (ATG) has attracted growing attention, which provides citations to support the model's responses in RAG. This paper proposes a fine-grained ATG method called ReClaim(Refer & Claim), which alternates the generation of references and answers step by step.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-01T20:47:47Z)
• Large Language Models Offer an Alternative to the Traditional Approach of Topic Modelling [0.9095496510579351]
  We investigate the untapped potential of large language models (LLMs) as an alternative for uncovering the underlying topics within extensive text corpora. Our findings indicate that LLMs with appropriate prompts can stand out as a viable alternative, capable of generating relevant topic titles and adhering to human guidelines to refine and merge topics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-24T17:39:51Z)
• Incremental hierarchical text clustering methods: a review [49.32130498861987]
  This study aims to analyze various hierarchical and incremental clustering techniques. The main contribution of this research is the organization and comparison of the techniques used by studies published between 2010 and 2018 that aimed to texts documents clustering.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-12T22:27:29Z)
• Hierarchical Catalogue Generation for Literature Review: A Benchmark [36.22298354302282]
  We construct a novel English Hierarchical Catalogues of Literature Reviews dataset with 7.6k literature review catalogues and 389k reference papers. To accurately assess the model performance, we design two evaluation metrics for informativeness and similarity to ground truth from semantics and structure.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-07T07:13:35Z)
• TaxoCom: Topic Taxonomy Completion with Hierarchical Discovery of Novel Topic Clusters [57.59286394188025]
  We propose a novel framework for topic taxonomy completion, named TaxoCom. TaxoCom discovers novel sub-topic clusters of terms and documents. Our comprehensive experiments on two real-world datasets demonstrate that TaxoCom not only generates the high-quality topic taxonomy in terms of term coherency and topic coverage.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-18T07:07:38Z)
• Author Clustering and Topic Estimation for Short Texts [69.54017251622211]
  We propose a novel model that expands on the Latent Dirichlet Allocation by modeling strong dependence among the words in the same document. We also simultaneously cluster users, removing the need for post-hoc cluster estimation. Our method performs as well as -- or better -- than traditional approaches to problems arising in short text.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-15T20:55:55Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.