The Computational Complexity of Circuit Discovery for Inner Interpretability

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2410.08025v2
• Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2024 08:02:34 GMT
• Title: The Computational Complexity of Circuit Discovery for Inner Interpretability
• Authors: Federico Adolfi, Martina G. Vilas, Todd Wareham,
• Abstract summary: We study circuit discovery with classical and parameterized computational complexity theory. Our findings reveal a challenging complexity landscape. This framework allows us to understand the scope and limits of interpretability queries.
• Score: 0.30723404270319693
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
• Abstract: Many proposed applications of neural networks in machine learning, cognitive/brain science, and society hinge on the feasibility of inner interpretability via circuit discovery. This calls for empirical and theoretical explorations of viable algorithmic options. Despite advances in the design and testing of heuristics, there are concerns about their scalability and faithfulness at a time when we lack understanding of the complexity properties of the problems they are deployed to solve. To address this, we study circuit discovery with classical and parameterized computational complexity theory: (1) we describe a conceptual scaffolding to reason about circuit finding queries in terms of affordances for description, explanation, prediction and control; (2) we formalize a comprehensive set of queries that capture mechanistic explanation, and propose a formal framework for their analysis; (3) we use it to settle the complexity of many query variants and relaxations of practical interest on multi-layer perceptrons (part of, e.g., transformers). Our findings reveal a challenging complexity landscape. Many queries are intractable (NP-hard, $\Sigma^p_2$-hard), remain fixed-parameter intractable (W[1]-hard) when constraining model/circuit features (e.g., depth), and are inapproximable under additive, multiplicative, and probabilistic approximation schemes. To navigate this landscape, we prove there exist transformations to tackle some of these hard problems (NP- vs. $\Sigma^p_2$-complete) with better-understood heuristics, and prove the tractability (PTIME) or fixed-parameter tractability (FPT) of more modest queries which retain useful affordances. This framework allows us to understand the scope and limits of interpretability queries, explore viable options, and compare their resource demands among existing and future architectures.

Related papers

• Advancing Algorithmic Approaches to Probabilistic Argumentation under the Constellation Approach [0.0]
  We develop an algorithm for the complex task of computing the probability of a set of arguments being a complete extension. An experimental evaluation shows promise of our approach.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-06T12:08:38Z)
• When Do Program-of-Thoughts Work for Reasoning? [51.2699797837818]
  We propose complexity-impacted reasoning score (CIRS) to measure correlation between code and reasoning abilities. Specifically, we use the abstract syntax tree to encode the structural information and calculate logical complexity. Code will be integrated into the EasyInstruct framework at https://github.com/zjunlp/EasyInstruct.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-29T17:22:39Z)
• Explainable Equivariant Neural Networks for Particle Physics: PELICAN [51.02649432050852]
  PELICAN is a novel permutation equivariant and Lorentz invariant aggregator network. We present a study of the PELICAN algorithm architecture in the context of both tagging (classification) and reconstructing (regression) Lorentz-boosted top quarks. We extend the application of PELICAN to the tasks of identifying quark-initiated vs.gluon-initiated jets, and a multi-class identification across five separate target categories of jets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-31T09:08:40Z)
• Learnability with PAC Semantics for Multi-agent Beliefs [38.88111785113001]
  The tension between deduction and induction is perhaps the most fundamental issue in areas such as philosophy, cognition and artificial intelligence. Valiant recognised that the challenge of learning should be integrated with deduction. Although weaker than classical entailment, it allows for a powerful model-theoretic framework for answering queries.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-08T18:22:46Z)
• Rethinking Complex Queries on Knowledge Graphs with Neural Link Predictors [58.340159346749964]
  We propose a new neural-symbolic method to support end-to-end learning using complex queries with provable reasoning capability. We develop a new dataset containing ten new types of queries with features that have never been considered. Our method outperforms previous methods significantly in the new dataset and also surpasses previous methods in the existing dataset at the same time.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-14T11:35:35Z)
• Logical Message Passing Networks with One-hop Inference on Atomic Formulas [57.47174363091452]
  We propose a framework for complex query answering that decomposes the Knowledge Graph embeddings from neural set operators. On top of the query graph, we propose the Logical Message Passing Neural Network (LMPNN) that connects the local one-hop inferences on atomic formulas to the global logical reasoning. Our approach yields the new state-of-the-art neural CQA model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-21T02:34:06Z)
• Successive Prompting for Decomposing Complex Questions [50.00659445976735]
  Recent works leverage the capabilities of large language models (LMs) to perform complex question answering in a few-shot setting. We introduce Successive Prompting'', where we iteratively break down a complex task into a simple task, solve it, and then repeat the process until we get the final solution. Our best model (with successive prompting) achieves an improvement of 5% absolute F1 on a few-shot version of the DROP dataset.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-08T06:03:38Z)
• Computational Complexity of Segmentation [0.0]
  The specification of cognitive system capacities is often shaped by unexamined intuitive assumptions about the search space and complexity of a subcomputation. We prove two sets of results regarding hardness and search space size that may run counter to intuition.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-31T10:33:03Z)
• Statistically Meaningful Approximation: a Case Study on Approximating Turing Machines with Transformers [50.85524803885483]
  This work proposes a formal definition of statistically meaningful (SM) approximation which requires the approximating network to exhibit good statistical learnability. We study SM approximation for two function classes: circuits and Turing machines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-28T04:28:55Z)
• A tetrachotomy of ontology-mediated queries with a covering axiom [1.749935196721634]
  Our concern is the problem of efficiently determining the data complexity of answering queries mediated by description and their optimal rewritings to standard database queries. We focus on Boolean conjunctive-mediated queries called disjunctive sirups (or d-sirups) Some d-sirups only have exponential-size resolution features, some only double-exponential-size positive existential existential-rewritings and single-exprecursive datalog rewritings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-07T14:47:07Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.