Think Beyond Size: Dynamic Prompting for More Effective Reasoning

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2410.08130v1
• Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2024 17:14:36 GMT
• Title: Think Beyond Size: Dynamic Prompting for More Effective Reasoning
• Authors: Kamesh R,
• Abstract summary: This paper presents Dynamic Prompting, a novel framework aimed at improving the reasoning capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs) In contrast to conventional static prompting methods, Dynamic Prompting enables the adaptive modification of prompt sequences and step counts based on real-time task complexity and model performance. Our empirical evaluations demonstrate that Dynamic Prompting allows smaller LLMs to perform competitively with much larger models, thereby challenging the conventional emphasis on model size as the primary determinant of reasoning efficacy.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: This paper presents Dynamic Prompting, a novel framework aimed at improving the reasoning capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs). In contrast to conventional static prompting methods, Dynamic Prompting enables the adaptive modification of prompt sequences and step counts based on real-time task complexity and model performance. This dynamic adaptation facilitates more efficient problem-solving, particularly in smaller models, by reducing hallucinations and repetitive cycles. Our empirical evaluations demonstrate that Dynamic Prompting allows smaller LLMs to perform competitively with much larger models, thereby challenging the conventional emphasis on model size as the primary determinant of reasoning efficacy.

Related papers

• Stepwise Perplexity-Guided Refinement for Efficient Chain-of-Thought Reasoning in Large Language Models [56.37421741507468]
  Chain-of-Thought (CoT) reasoning has significantly enhanced the performance of large language models (LLMs) We propose a method to identify critical reasoning steps using perplexity as a measure of their importance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-18T20:04:51Z)
• PEA: Enhancing LLM Performance on Computational-Reasoning Tasks [21.13926189404758]
  This study introduces a formal approach to describe and solve a class of important reasoning tasks termed computational reasoning problems. The framework decomposes these problems into predicate and enumeration components, using LLMs to synthesize programs based on specified predicates, enumeration, and aggregation rules. Empirical evaluation reveals that PEA substantially enhances the performance of underlying models on benchmark computational problems, yielding an average accuracy improvement of approximately $50%$, coupled with increased efficiency.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-16T00:27:05Z)
• Adaptive Graph of Thoughts: Test-Time Adaptive Reasoning Unifying Chain, Tree, and Graph Structures [0.0]
  We introduce Adaptive Graph of Thoughts (AGoT), a dynamic, graph-based inference framework. AGoT enhances Large Language Models (LLMs) reasoning solely at test time. We validate our approach on diverse benchmarks spanning multi-hop retrieval, scientific reasoning, and mathematical problem-solving.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-07T16:54:19Z)
• Eliciting Causal Abilities in Large Language Models for Reasoning Tasks [14.512834333917414]
  We introduce the Self-Causal Instruction Enhancement (SCIE) method, which enables LLMs to generate high-quality, low-quantity observational data. In SCIE, the instructions are treated as the treatment, and textual features are used to process natural language. Our method effectively generates instructions that enhance reasoning performance with reduced training cost of prompts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-19T17:03:02Z)
• Evolutionary Pre-Prompt Optimization for Mathematical Reasoning [45.461506988071534]
  This paper explores the optimization of example selection for designing effective chain-of-thought pre-prompts. It shows that the choice of the algorithm, typically in favor of comparison-based methods such as evolutionary computation, significantly enhances efficacy and feasibility.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-05T16:12:06Z)
• Enhancing Multi-Step Reasoning Abilities of Language Models through Direct Q-Function Optimization [49.362750475706235]
  Reinforcement Learning (RL) plays a crucial role in aligning large language models with human preferences and improving their ability to perform complex tasks. We introduce Direct Q-function Optimization (DQO), which formulates the response generation process as a Markov Decision Process (MDP) and utilizes the soft actor-critic (SAC) framework to optimize a Q-function directly parameterized by the language model. Experimental results on two math problem-solving datasets, GSM8K and MATH, demonstrate that DQO outperforms previous methods, establishing it as a promising offline reinforcement learning approach for aligning language models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-11T23:29:20Z)
• Improving LLM Reasoning through Scaling Inference Computation with Collaborative Verification [52.095460362197336]
  Large language models (LLMs) struggle with consistent and accurate reasoning. LLMs are trained primarily on correct solutions, reducing their ability to detect and learn from errors. We propose a novel collaborative method integrating Chain-of-Thought (CoT) and Program-of-Thought (PoT) solutions for verification.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-05T05:21:48Z)
• Fine-Tuning with Divergent Chains of Thought Boosts Reasoning Through Self-Correction in Language Models [63.36637269634553]
  We present a novel method of further improving performance by requiring models to compare multiple reasoning chains. We find that instruction tuning on DCoT datasets boosts the performance of even smaller, and therefore more accessible, language models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-03T15:01:18Z)
• Enhancing Chain-of-Thoughts Prompting with Iterative Bootstrapping in Large Language Models [81.01397924280612]
  Large language models (LLMs) can achieve highly effective performance on various reasoning tasks by incorporating step-by-step chain-of-thought (CoT) prompting as demonstrations. We introduce Iter-CoT (Iterative bootstrapping in Chain-of-Thoughts Prompting), an iterative bootstrapping approach for selecting exemplars and generating reasoning chains.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-23T13:54:39Z)
• Rationale-Augmented Ensembles in Language Models [53.45015291520658]
  We reconsider rationale-augmented prompting for few-shot in-context learning. We identify rationale sampling in the output space as the key component to robustly improve performance. We demonstrate that rationale-augmented ensembles achieve more accurate and interpretable results than existing prompting approaches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-02T06:20:57Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.