Can In-context Learning Really Generalize to Out-of-distribution Tasks?

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2410.09695v2
• Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2024 12:22:50 GMT
• Title: Can In-context Learning Really Generalize to Out-of-distribution Tasks?
• Authors: Qixun Wang, Yifei Wang, Yisen Wang, Xianghua Ying,
• Abstract summary: We investigate the mechanism of in-context learning (ICL) on out-of-distribution (OOD) tasks that were not encountered during training. We reveal that Transformers may struggle to learn OOD task functions through ICL.
• Score: 36.11431280689549
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: In this work, we explore the mechanism of in-context learning (ICL) on out-of-distribution (OOD) tasks that were not encountered during training. To achieve this, we conduct synthetic experiments where the objective is to learn OOD mathematical functions through ICL using a GPT-2 model. We reveal that Transformers may struggle to learn OOD task functions through ICL. Specifically, ICL performance resembles implementing a function within the pretraining hypothesis space and optimizing it with gradient descent based on the in-context examples. Additionally, we investigate ICL's well-documented ability to learn unseen abstract labels in context. We demonstrate that such ability only manifests in the scenarios without distributional shifts and, therefore, may not serve as evidence of new-task-learning ability. Furthermore, we assess ICL's performance on OOD tasks when the model is pretrained on multiple tasks. Both empirical and theoretical analyses demonstrate the existence of the \textbf{low-test-error preference} of ICL, where it tends to implement the pretraining function that yields low test error in the testing context. We validate this through numerical experiments. This new theoretical result, combined with our empirical findings, elucidates the mechanism of ICL in addressing OOD tasks.

Related papers

• Bayesian scaling laws for in-context learning [72.17734205418502]
  In-context learning (ICL) is a powerful technique for getting language models to perform complex tasks with no training updates. We show that ICL approximates a Bayesian learner and develop a family of novel Bayesian scaling laws for ICL.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-21T21:45:22Z)
• MILE: A Mutation Testing Framework of In-Context Learning Systems [5.419884861365132]
  We propose a mutation testing framework designed to characterize the quality and effectiveness of test data for ICL systems. First, we propose several mutation operators specialized for ICL demonstrations, as well as corresponding mutation scores for ICL test sets. With comprehensive experiments, we showcase the effectiveness of our framework in evaluating the reliability and quality of ICL test suites.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-07T13:51:42Z)
• Investigating the Pre-Training Dynamics of In-Context Learning: Task Recognition vs. Task Learning [99.05401042153214]
  In-context learning (ICL) is potentially attributed to two major abilities: task recognition (TR) and task learning (TL) We take the first step by examining the pre-training dynamics of the emergence of ICL. We propose a simple yet effective method to better integrate these two abilities for ICL at inference time.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-20T06:37:47Z)
• What Do Language Models Learn in Context? The Structured Task Hypothesis [89.65045443150889]
  Large language models (LLMs) learn a novel task from in-context examples presented in a demonstration, termed in-context learning (ICL) One popular hypothesis explains ICL by task selection. Another popular hypothesis is that ICL is a form of meta-learning, i.e., the models learn a learning algorithm at pre-training time and apply it to the demonstration.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-06T16:15:34Z)
• DETAIL: Task DEmonsTration Attribution for Interpretable In-context Learning [75.68193159293425]
  In-context learning (ICL) allows transformer-based language models to learn a specific task with a few "task demonstrations" without updating their parameters. We propose an influence function-based attribution technique, DETAIL, that addresses the specific characteristics of ICL. We experimentally prove the wide applicability of DETAIL by showing our attribution scores obtained on white-box models are transferable to black-box models in improving model performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-22T15:52:52Z)
• ParaICL: Towards Robust Parallel In-Context Learning [74.38022919598443]
  Large language models (LLMs) have become the norm in natural language processing. Few-shot in-context learning (ICL) relies on the choice of few-shot demonstration examples. We propose a novel method named parallel in-context learning (ParaICL)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-31T05:56:15Z)
• Dual Operating Modes of In-Context Learning [8.664657381613695]
  In-context learning (ICL) exhibits dual operating modes: task learning, and task retrieval. Recent theoretical work investigates various mathematical models to analyze ICL. We introduce a probabilistic model, with which one can explain the dual operating modes of ICL simultaneously.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-29T03:06:10Z)
• In-Context Learning Functions with Varying Number of Minima [3.3268674937926224]
  We propose a new task of approximating functions with varying number of minima. We find that increasing the number of minima degrades ICL performance. At the same time, our evaluation shows that ICL outperforms 2-layer Neural Network (2NN) model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-21T11:33:03Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.