Single-shot Distinguishability and Anti-distinguishability of Quantum Measurements
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2410.10632v2
- Date: Sun, 17 Aug 2025 20:30:47 GMT
- Title: Single-shot Distinguishability and Anti-distinguishability of Quantum Measurements
- Authors: Satyaki Manna, Sneha Suresh, Manan Singh Kachhawaha, Debashis Saha,
- Abstract summary: We study the probability of distinguishing (and antidistinguishing) quantum measurements sampled from a given set in the single-shot regime.<n>We show that the distinguishability of any pair of qubit projective measurements in scenario (iii) is always greater than its value in scenario (ii)<n>We present qubit measurements that are perfectly distinguishable (and antidistinguishable) in scenario (iv) but not in any other scenarios.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Among the surprising features of quantum measurements, the problem of distinguishing and antidistinguishing general quantum measurements is fundamentally appealing. Unlike classical systems, quantum theory offers entangled states and peculiar state update rule of the post-measurement state, which gives rise to four distinct scenarios: (i) probing single systems and without access to the Post-measurement States (PMS), (ii) probing entangled systems and without access to the PMS, (iii) probing single systems with access to the PMS, and (iv) probing entangled systems with access to the PMS. We study the probability of distinguishing (and antidistinguishing) quantum measurements sampled from a given set in the single-shot regime. For some scenarios, we provide the analytical expressions of distinguishability (and antidistinguishability) for qubit projective measurements. We show that the distinguishability of any pair of qubit projective measurements in scenario (iii) is always greater than its value in scenario (ii). Interestingly, certain pairs of non-projective qubit measurements achieve optimal distinguishability in scenario (ii) with a non-maximally entangled state. In general, for any set of measurements, distinguishability (and antidistinguishability) in scenario (i) never exceeds that in any other scenario, while it reaches its highest possible value in scenario (iv). We establish that there is no hierarchical relation between scenarios (ii) and (iii). In particular, we introduce different variants of the well-known `trine' qubit measurement to construct pairs (and triples) of qubit quantum measurements such that they are perfectly distinguishable (and antidistinguishable) in scenario (ii) but not in scenario (iii), and vice versa. Additionally, we present qubit measurements that are perfectly distinguishable (and antidistinguishable) in scenario (iv) but not in any other scenarios.
Related papers
- Quasiprobabilities from incomplete and overcomplete measurements [0.0]
We discuss the (re-)construction of quasiprobability representations from generic measurements, including noisy ones.<n>A practical concern that we address is the treatment of informationally incomplete and overcomplete measurement scenarios.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-11-06T11:09:37Z) - Multidimensional Uncertainty Quantification via Optimal Transport [87.97146725546502]
We take a multidimensional view on uncertainty quantification (UQ) by stacking complementary UQ measures into a vector.<n>VecUQ-OT shows high efficiency even when individual measures fail.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-09-26T14:09:03Z) - Quantum Sequential Universal Hypothesis Testing [62.751483592497806]
Quantum hypothesis testing (QHT) concerns the statistical inference of unknown quantum states.<n>We introduce the quantum sequential universal test (QSUT), a novel framework for sequential QHT in the general case of composite hypotheses.<n> QSUT builds on universal inference, and it alternates between adaptive local measurements aimed at exploring the hypothesis space and joint measurements optimized for maximal discrimination.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-08-29T12:50:04Z) - Self-testing in a constrained prepare-measure scenario sans assuming quantum dimension [0.0]
We present a device-independent (DI) self-testing protocol in a constrained prepare-measure scenario.<n>We derive the optimal quantum success probability in the POM task devoid of assuming the dimension of the quantum system.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-26T06:55:02Z) - Measurement-Incompatibility Constraints for Maximal Randomness [5.560127372386599]
Certifying maximal quantum randomness without assumptions about system dimension remains a pivotal challenge for secure communication and foundational studies.<n>Here, we introduce a generalized framework to directly certify maximal randomness from observed probability distributions across systems with arbitrary user numbers.<n>Our results establish a versatile and experimentally accessible route to scalable randomness certification, with implications for quantum cryptography and the physics of nonlocal correlations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-23T07:45:11Z) - Device-independent secure correlations in sequential quantum scenarios [44.99833362998488]
Device-independent quantum information is attracting significant attention, particularly for its applications in information security.
We propose a systematic approach to designing sequential quantum protocols for device-independent security.
We analytically prove that, with this systematic construction, the resulting ideal correlations are secure in the sense that they cannot be reproduced as a statistical mixture of other correlations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-03-18T16:45:20Z) - Self-testing of multiple unsharpness parameters through sequential violations of non-contextual inequality [0.0]
We put forth a protocol for self-testing of noisy quantum instruments.
We derive the optimal set of quantum violations without specifying the dimension of the quantum system.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-08-19T19:04:48Z) - Certifying measurement incompatibility in prepare-and-measure and Bell scenarios [0.6249768559720122]
We consider the problem of certifying measurement incompatibility in a prepare-and-measure (PM) scenario.
We present different families of sets of qubit measurements which are incompatible, but cannot lead to any quantum over classical advantage.
Our examples are obtained via a general theorem which proves a set of qubit dichotomic measurements can have their incompatibility certified in a PM scenario.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-09T11:58:19Z) - Certainly Uncertain: A Benchmark and Metric for Multimodal Epistemic and Aleatoric Awareness [106.52630978891054]
We present a taxonomy of uncertainty specific to vision-language AI systems.
We also introduce a new metric confidence-weighted accuracy, that is well correlated with both accuracy and calibration error.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-02T04:23:54Z) - To Believe or Not to Believe Your LLM [51.2579827761899]
We explore uncertainty quantification in large language models (LLMs)
We derive an information-theoretic metric that allows to reliably detect when only epistemic uncertainty is large.
We conduct a series of experiments which demonstrate the advantage of our formulation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-04T17:58:18Z) - Measurement-Device-Independent Detection of Beyond-Quantum State [53.64687146666141]
We propose a measurement-device-independent (MDI) test for beyond-quantum state detection.
We discuss the importance of tomographic completeness of the input sets to the detection.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-12-11T06:40:13Z) - Discriminating mixed qubit states with collective measurements [0.2621730497733947]
We propose and experimentally demonstrate a protocol for distinguishing two copies of single qubit states using collective measurements.
We implement our measurements on an IBM Q System One device, a superconducting quantum processor.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-02-17T14:02:26Z) - Experimental demonstration of optimal unambiguous two-out-of-four
quantum state elimination [52.77024349608834]
A core principle of quantum theory is that non-orthogonal quantum states cannot be perfectly distinguished with single-shot measurements.
Here we implement a quantum state elimination measurement which unambiguously rules out two of four pure, non-orthogonal quantum states.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-06-30T18:00:01Z) - Experimentally determining the incompatibility of two qubit measurements [55.41644538483948]
We describe and realize an experimental procedure for assessing the incompatibility of two qubit measurements.
We demonstrate this fact in an optical setup, where the qubit states are encoded into the photons' polarization degrees of freedom.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-12-15T19:01:44Z) - Minimal scheme for certifying three-outcome qubit measurements in the
prepare-and-measure scenario [0.0]
The number of outcomes is a defining property of a quantum measurement.
The certification of this property is possible in a semi-device-independent way.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-05-20T17:39:46Z) - Optimal Adaptive Strategies for Sequential Quantum Hypothesis Testing [87.17253904965372]
We consider sequential hypothesis testing between two quantum states using adaptive and non-adaptive strategies.
We show that these errors decrease exponentially with decay rates given by the measured relative entropies between the two states.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-04-30T00:52:48Z) - Imaginarity-free quantum multiparameter estimation [0.0]
We present a class of quantum statistical models, which utilize antiunitary symmetries or, equivalently, real density matrices.
The symmetries accompany the target-independent optimal measurements for pure-state models.
We also introduce a function which measures antiunitary asymmetry of quantum statistical models as a potential tool to characterize quantumness of phase transitions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-10-29T10:21:57Z) - Adaptive generalized measurement for unambiguous state discrimination of
quaternary phase-shift-keying coherent states [0.0]
We experimentally demonstrate an adaptive generalized measurement that can unambiguously discriminate the quaternary phase-shift-keying coherent states.
Our results show a clear improvement of both a probability of conclusive results and a ratio of erroneous decision caused by unavoidable experimental imperfections over conventional static generalized measurements.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-09-05T16:09:46Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.