signwriting-evaluation: Effective Sign Language Evaluation via SignWriting

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2410.13668v1
• Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2024 15:28:45 GMT
• Title: signwriting-evaluation: Effective Sign Language Evaluation via SignWriting
• Authors: Amit Moryossef, Rotem Zilberman, Ohad Langer,
• Abstract summary: This paper introduces a comprehensive suite of evaluation metrics specifically designed for SignWriting. We address the challenges of evaluating single signs versus continuous signing. Our findings reveal the strengths and limitations of each metric, offering valuable insights for future advancements.
• Score: 3.484261625026626
• License:
• Abstract: The lack of automatic evaluation metrics tailored for SignWriting presents a significant obstacle in developing effective transcription and translation models for signed languages. This paper introduces a comprehensive suite of evaluation metrics specifically designed for SignWriting, including adaptations of standard metrics such as \texttt{BLEU} and \texttt{chrF}, the application of \texttt{CLIPScore} to SignWriting images, and a novel symbol distance metric unique to our approach. We address the distinct challenges of evaluating single signs versus continuous signing and provide qualitative demonstrations of metric efficacy through score distribution analyses and nearest-neighbor searches within the SignBank corpus. Our findings reveal the strengths and limitations of each metric, offering valuable insights for future advancements using SignWriting. This work contributes essential tools for evaluating SignWriting models, facilitating progress in the field of sign language processing. Our code is available at \url{https://github.com/sign-language-processing/signwriting-evaluation}.

Related papers

• MS2SL: Multimodal Spoken Data-Driven Continuous Sign Language Production [93.32354378820648]
  We propose a unified framework for continuous sign language production, easing communication between sign and non-sign language users. A sequence diffusion model, utilizing embeddings extracted from text or speech, is crafted to generate sign predictions step by step. Experiments on How2Sign and PHOENIX14T datasets demonstrate that our model achieves competitive performance in sign language production.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-04T13:53:50Z)
• SignMusketeers: An Efficient Multi-Stream Approach for Sign Language Translation at Scale [22.49602248323602]
  A persistent challenge in sign language video processing is how we learn representations of sign language. Our proposed method focuses on just the most relevant parts in a signing video: the face, hands and body posture of the signer. Our approach is based on learning from individual frames (rather than video sequences) and is therefore much more efficient than prior work on sign language pre-training.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-11T03:00:41Z)
• Autoregressive Sign Language Production: A Gloss-Free Approach with Discrete Representations [8.254354613959224]
  Gloss-free Sign Language Production (SLP) offers a direct translation of spoken language sentences into sign language. This paper presents a novel approach to SLP that leverages Vector Quantization to derive discrete representations from sign pose sequences.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-21T15:46:01Z)
• Multiscale Feature Learning Using Co-Tuplet Loss for Offline Handwritten Signature Verification [0.0]
  We introduce the MultiScale Signature feature learning Network (MS-SigNet) with the co-tuplet loss. MS-SigNet learns both global and regional signature features from multiple spatial scales, enhancing feature discrimination. We also present HanSig, a large-scale Chinese signature dataset to support robust system development for this language.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-01T10:14:43Z)
• On the Importance of Signer Overlap for Sign Language Detection [65.26091369630547]
  We argue that the current benchmark data sets for sign language detection estimate overly positive results that do not generalize well. We quantify this with a detailed analysis of the effect of signer overlap on current sign detection benchmark data sets. We propose new data set partitions that are free of overlap and allow for more realistic performance assessment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-19T22:15:05Z)
• Automatic dense annotation of large-vocabulary sign language videos [85.61513254261523]
  We propose a simple, scalable framework to vastly increase the density of automatic annotations. We make these annotations publicly available to support the sign language research community.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-08-04T17:55:09Z)
• Read and Attend: Temporal Localisation in Sign Language Videos [84.30262812057994]
  We train a Transformer model to ingest a continuous signing stream and output a sequence of written tokens. We show that it acquires the ability to attend to a large vocabulary of sign instances in the input sequence, enabling their localisation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-30T16:39:53Z)
• Watch, read and lookup: learning to spot signs from multiple supervisors [99.50956498009094]
  Given a video of an isolated sign, our task is to identify whether and where it has been signed in a continuous, co-articulated sign language video. We train a model using multiple types of available supervision by: (1) watching existing sparsely labelled footage; (2) reading associated subtitles which provide additional weak-supervision; and (3) looking up words in visual sign language dictionaries. These three tasks are integrated into a unified learning framework using the principles of Noise Contrastive Estimation and Multiple Instance Learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-08T14:12:56Z)
• BSL-1K: Scaling up co-articulated sign language recognition using mouthing cues [106.21067543021887]
  We show how to use mouthing cues from signers to obtain high-quality annotations from video data. The BSL-1K dataset is a collection of British Sign Language (BSL) signs of unprecedented scale.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-23T16:59:01Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.