Reproducibility study of "LICO: Explainable Models with Language-Image Consistency"

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2410.13989v1
• Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2024 19:41:34 GMT
• Title: Reproducibility study of "LICO: Explainable Models with Language-Image Consistency"
• Authors: Luan Fletcher, Robert van der Klis, Martin Sedláček, Stefan Vasilev, Christos Athanasiadis,
• Abstract summary: This paper investigates the claims made by Lei et al. (2023) regarding their proposed method, LICO, for enhancing post-hoc interpretability techniques. We do not find that LICO consistently led to improved classification performance or improvements in quantitative and qualitative measures of interpretability.
• Score: 0.5825410941577593
• License: http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
• Abstract: The growing reproducibility crisis in machine learning has brought forward a need for careful examination of research findings. This paper investigates the claims made by Lei et al. (2023) regarding their proposed method, LICO, for enhancing post-hoc interpretability techniques and improving image classification performance. LICO leverages natural language supervision from a vision-language model to enrich feature representations and guide the learning process. We conduct a comprehensive reproducibility study, employing (Wide) ResNets and established interpretability methods like Grad-CAM and RISE. We were mostly unable to reproduce the authors' results. In particular, we did not find that LICO consistently led to improved classification performance or improvements in quantitative and qualitative measures of interpretability. Thus, our findings highlight the importance of rigorous evaluation and transparent reporting in interpretability research.

Related papers

• Dancing with Critiques: Enhancing LLM Reasoning with Stepwise Natural Language Self-Critique [66.94905631175209]
  We propose a novel inference-time scaling approach -- stepwise natural language self-critique (PANEL) It employs self-generated natural language critiques as feedback to guide the step-level search process. This approach bypasses the need for task-specific verifiers and the associated training overhead.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-21T17:59:55Z)
• Fine-Grained Bias Detection in LLM: Enhancing detection mechanisms for nuanced biases [0.0]
  This study presents a detection framework to identify nuanced biases in Large Language Models (LLMs) The approach integrates contextual analysis, interpretability via attention mechanisms, and counterfactual data augmentation to capture hidden biases. Results show improvements in detecting subtle biases compared to conventional methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-08T04:43:01Z)
• ReLearn: Unlearning via Learning for Large Language Models [64.2802606302194]
  We propose ReLearn, a data augmentation and fine-tuning pipeline for effective unlearning. This framework introduces Knowledge Forgetting Rate (KFR) and Knowledge Retention Rate (KRR) to measure knowledge-level preservation. Our experiments show that ReLearn successfully achieves targeted forgetting while preserving high-quality output.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-16T16:31:00Z)
• Self-Evolving Critique Abilities in Large Language Models [59.861013614500024]
  This paper explores enhancing critique abilities of Large Language Models (LLMs)<n>We introduce SCRIT, a framework that trains LLMs with self-generated data to evolve their critique abilities.<n>Our analysis reveals that SCRIT's performance scales positively with data and model size.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-10T05:51:52Z)
• Self-Improvement in Language Models: The Sharpening Mechanism [70.9248553790022]
  We offer a new perspective on the capabilities of self-improvement through a lens we refer to as sharpening. Motivated by the observation that language models are often better at verifying response quality than they are at generating correct responses, we formalize self-improvement as using the model itself as a verifier during post-training. We analyze two natural families of self-improvement algorithms based on SFT and RLHF.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-02T20:24:17Z)
• Why do you cite? An investigation on citation intents and decision-making classification processes [1.7812428873698407]
  This study emphasizes the importance of trustfully classifying citation intents. We present a study utilizing advanced Ensemble Strategies for Citation Intent Classification (CIC) One of our models sets as a new state-of-the-art (SOTA) with an 89.46% Macro-F1 score on the SciCite benchmark.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-18T09:29:33Z)
• Evaluating Human Alignment and Model Faithfulness of LLM Rationale [66.75309523854476]
  We study how well large language models (LLMs) explain their generations through rationales. We show that prompting-based methods are less "faithful" than attribution-based explanations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-28T20:06:30Z)
• Enhancing Retrieval-Augmented LMs with a Two-stage Consistency Learning Compressor [4.35807211471107]
  This work proposes a novel two-stage consistency learning approach for retrieved information compression in retrieval-augmented language models. The proposed method is empirically validated across multiple datasets, demonstrating notable enhancements in precision and efficiency for question-answering tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-04T12:43:23Z)
• Multi-Modal Prompt Learning on Blind Image Quality Assessment [65.0676908930946]
  Image Quality Assessment (IQA) models benefit significantly from semantic information, which allows them to treat different types of objects distinctly. Traditional methods, hindered by a lack of sufficiently annotated data, have employed the CLIP image-text pretraining model as their backbone to gain semantic awareness. Recent approaches have attempted to address this mismatch using prompt technology, but these solutions have shortcomings. This paper introduces an innovative multi-modal prompt-based methodology for IQA.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-23T11:45:32Z)
• Lost in the Source Language: How Large Language Models Evaluate the Quality of Machine Translation [64.5862977630713]
  This study investigates how Large Language Models (LLMs) leverage source and reference data in machine translation evaluation task. We find that reference information significantly enhances the evaluation accuracy, while surprisingly, source information sometimes is counterproductive.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-12T13:23:21Z)
• Rethinking Word-Level Auto-Completion in Computer-Aided Translation [76.34184928621477]
  Word-Level Auto-Completion (WLAC) plays a crucial role in Computer-Assisted Translation. It aims at providing word-level auto-completion suggestions for human translators. We introduce a measurable criterion to answer this question and discover that existing WLAC models often fail to meet this criterion. We propose an effective approach to enhance WLAC performance by promoting adherence to the criterion.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-23T03:11:46Z)
• AI Text-to-Behavior: A Study In Steerability [0.0]
  The research explores the steerability of Large Language Models (LLMs) We quantitatively gauged the model's responsiveness to tailored prompts using a behavioral psychology framework called OCEAN. Our findings underscore GPT's versatility and ability to discern and adapt to nuanced instructions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-07T18:14:24Z)
• Exploring Large Language Model for Graph Data Understanding in Online Job Recommendations [63.19448893196642]
  We present a novel framework that harnesses the rich contextual information and semantic representations provided by large language models to analyze behavior graphs. By leveraging this capability, our framework enables personalized and accurate job recommendations for individual users.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-10T11:29:41Z)
• Post Hoc Explanations of Language Models Can Improve Language Models [43.2109029463221]
  We present a novel framework, Amplifying Model Performance by Leveraging In-Context Learning with Post Hoc Explanations (AMPLIFY) We leverage post hoc explanation methods which output attribution scores (explanations) capturing the influence of each of the input features on model predictions. Our framework, AMPLIFY, leads to prediction accuracy improvements of about 10-25% over a wide range of tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-19T04:46:04Z)
• Investigating Fairness Disparities in Peer Review: A Language Model Enhanced Approach [77.61131357420201]
  We conduct a thorough and rigorous study on fairness disparities in peer review with the help of large language models (LMs) We collect, assemble, and maintain a comprehensive relational database for the International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR) conference from 2017 to date. We postulate and study fairness disparities on multiple protective attributes of interest, including author gender, geography, author, and institutional prestige.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-07T16:19:42Z)
• Interpretable Research Replication Prediction via Variational Contextual Consistency Sentence Masking [14.50690911709558]
  Research Replication Prediction (RRP) is the task of predicting whether a published research result can be replicated or not. In this work, we propose the Variational Contextual Consistency Sentence Masking (VCCSM) method to automatically extract key sentences. Results of our experiments on RRP along with European Convention of Human Rights (ECHR) datasets demonstrate that VCCSM is able to improve the model interpretability for the long document classification tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-28T03:27:13Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.