Spectral Representations for Accurate Causal Uncertainty Quantification with Gaussian Processes

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2410.14483v1
• Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2024 14:06:49 GMT
• Title: Spectral Representations for Accurate Causal Uncertainty Quantification with Gaussian Processes
• Authors: Hugh Dance, Peter Orbanz, Arthur Gretton,
• Abstract summary: We introduce a method, IMPspec, that addresses limitations via a spectral representation of the Hilbert space. We show that posteriors in this model can be obtained explicitly, by extending a result in Hilbert space regression theory. We also learn the spectral representation to optimise posterior calibration.
• Score: 19.449942440902593
• License:
• Abstract: Accurate uncertainty quantification for causal effects is essential for robust decision making in complex systems, but remains challenging in non-parametric settings. One promising framework represents conditional distributions in a reproducing kernel Hilbert space and places Gaussian process priors on them to infer posteriors on causal effects, but requires restrictive nuclear dominant kernels and approximations that lead to unreliable uncertainty estimates. In this work, we introduce a method, IMPspec, that addresses these limitations via a spectral representation of the Hilbert space. We show that posteriors in this model can be obtained explicitly, by extending a result in Hilbert space regression theory. We also learn the spectral representation to optimise posterior calibration. Our method achieves state-of-the-art performance in uncertainty quantification and causal Bayesian optimisation across simulations and a healthcare application.

Related papers

• Calibrating Neural Simulation-Based Inference with Differentiable Coverage Probability [50.44439018155837]
  We propose to include a calibration term directly into the training objective of the neural model. By introducing a relaxation of the classical formulation of calibration error we enable end-to-end backpropagation. It is directly applicable to existing computational pipelines allowing reliable black-box posterior inference.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-20T10:20:45Z)
• Sampling from Gaussian Process Posteriors using Stochastic Gradient Descent [43.097493761380186]
  gradient algorithms are an efficient method of approximately solving linear systems. We show that gradient descent produces accurate predictions, even in cases where it does not converge quickly to the optimum. Experimentally, gradient descent achieves state-of-the-art performance on sufficiently large-scale or ill-conditioned regression tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-20T15:07:37Z)
• Provable convergence guarantees for black-box variational inference [19.421222110188605]
  Black-box variational inference is widely used in situations where there is no proof that its optimization succeeds. We provide rigorous guarantees that methods similar to those used in practice converge on realistic inference problems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-04T11:31:41Z)
• Regularized Vector Quantization for Tokenized Image Synthesis [126.96880843754066]
  Quantizing images into discrete representations has been a fundamental problem in unified generative modeling. deterministic quantization suffers from severe codebook collapse and misalignment with inference stage while quantization suffers from low codebook utilization and reconstruction objective. This paper presents a regularized vector quantization framework that allows to mitigate perturbed above issues effectively by applying regularization from two perspectives.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-11T15:20:54Z)
• Sharp Calibrated Gaussian Processes [58.94710279601622]
  State-of-the-art approaches for designing calibrated models rely on inflating the Gaussian process posterior variance. We present a calibration approach that generates predictive quantiles using a computation inspired by the vanilla Gaussian process posterior variance. Our approach is shown to yield a calibrated model under reasonable assumptions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-23T12:17:36Z)
• Statistical Inverse Problems in Hilbert Scales [0.0]
  We study the Tikhonov regularization scheme in Hilbert scales for the nonlinear statistical inverse problem with a general noise. The regularizing norm in this scheme is stronger than the norm in Hilbert space.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-08-28T21:06:05Z)
• Optimal policy evaluation using kernel-based temporal difference methods [78.83926562536791]
  We use kernel Hilbert spaces for estimating the value function of an infinite-horizon discounted Markov reward process. We derive a non-asymptotic upper bound on the error with explicit dependence on the eigenvalues of the associated kernel operator. We prove minimax lower bounds over sub-classes of MRPs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-24T14:48:20Z)
• Gaussian Process Uniform Error Bounds with Unknown Hyperparameters for Safety-Critical Applications [71.23286211775084]
  We introduce robust Gaussian process uniform error bounds in settings with unknown hyper parameters. Our approach computes a confidence region in the space of hyper parameters, which enables us to obtain a probabilistic upper bound for the model error. Experiments show that the bound performs significantly better than vanilla and fully Bayesian processes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-06T17:10:01Z)
• Bosonic field digitization for quantum computers [62.997667081978825]
  We address the representation of lattice bosonic fields in a discretized field amplitude basis. We develop methods to predict error scaling and present efficient qubit implementation strategies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-08-24T15:30:04Z)
• Non-asymptotic Optimal Prediction Error for Growing-dimensional Partially Functional Linear Models [0.951828574518325]
  We show the rate-optimal upper and lower bounds of the prediction error. An exact upper bound for the excess prediction risk is shown in a non-asymptotic form. We derive the non-asymptotic minimax lower bound under the regularity assumption of the Kullback-Leibler divergence of the models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-10T08:49:32Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.