Security Threats in Agentic AI System

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2410.14728v1
• Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2024 06:40:02 GMT
• Title: Security Threats in Agentic AI System
• Authors: Raihan Khan, Sayak Sarkar, Sainik Kumar Mahata, Edwin Jose,
• Abstract summary: The complexity of AI systems combined with their ability to process and analyze large volumes of data increases the chances of data leaks or breaches. As AI agents evolve with greater autonomy, their capacity to bypass or exploit security measures becomes a growing concern.
• Score: 0.0
• License:
• Abstract: This research paper explores the privacy and security threats posed to an Agentic AI system with direct access to database systems. Such access introduces significant risks, including unauthorized retrieval of sensitive information, potential exploitation of system vulnerabilities, and misuse of personal or confidential data. The complexity of AI systems combined with their ability to process and analyze large volumes of data increases the chances of data leaks or breaches, which could occur unintentionally or through adversarial manipulation. Furthermore, as AI agents evolve with greater autonomy, their capacity to bypass or exploit security measures becomes a growing concern, heightening the need to address these critical vulnerabilities in agentic systems.

Related papers

• Security of and by Generative AI platforms [0.0]
  This whitepaper highlights the dual importance of securing generative AI (genAI) platforms and leveraging genAI for cybersecurity. As genAI technologies proliferate, their misuse poses significant risks, including data breaches, model tampering, and malicious content generation. The whitepaper explores strategies for robust security frameworks around genAI systems, while also showcasing how genAI can empower organizations to anticipate, detect, and mitigate sophisticated cyber threats.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-15T15:27:05Z)
• Safeguarding AI Agents: Developing and Analyzing Safety Architectures [0.0]
  This paper addresses the need for safety measures in AI systems that collaborate with human teams. We propose and evaluate three frameworks to enhance safety protocols in AI agent systems. We conclude that these frameworks can significantly strengthen the safety and security of AI agent systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-03T10:14:51Z)
• BreachSeek: A Multi-Agent Automated Penetration Tester [0.0]
  BreachSeek is an AI-driven multi-agent software platform that identifies and exploits vulnerabilities without human intervention. In preliminary evaluations, BreachSeek successfully exploited vulnerabilities in exploitable machines within local networks. Future developments aim to expand its capabilities, positioning it as an indispensable tool for cybersecurity professionals.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-31T19:15:38Z)
• AI Agents Under Threat: A Survey of Key Security Challenges and Future Pathways [10.16690494897609]
  An Artificial Intelligence (AI) agent is a software entity that autonomously performs tasks or makes decisions based on pre-defined objectives and data inputs. This survey delves into the emerging security threats faced by AI agents, categorizing them into four critical knowledge gaps. By systematically reviewing these threats, this paper highlights both the progress made and the existing limitations in safeguarding AI agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-04T01:22:31Z)
• Mapping LLM Security Landscapes: A Comprehensive Stakeholder Risk Assessment Proposal [0.0]
  We propose a risk assessment process using tools like the risk rating methodology which is used for traditional systems. We conduct scenario analysis to identify potential threat agents and map the dependent system components against vulnerability factors. We also map threats against three key stakeholder groups.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-20T05:17:22Z)
• Managing extreme AI risks amid rapid progress [171.05448842016125]
  We describe risks that include large-scale social harms, malicious uses, and irreversible loss of human control over autonomous AI systems. There is a lack of consensus about how exactly such risks arise, and how to manage them. Present governance initiatives lack the mechanisms and institutions to prevent misuse and recklessness, and barely address autonomous systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-26T17:59:06Z)
• ThreatKG: An AI-Powered System for Automated Open-Source Cyber Threat Intelligence Gathering and Management [65.0114141380651]
  ThreatKG is an automated system for OSCTI gathering and management. It efficiently collects a large number of OSCTI reports from multiple sources. It uses specialized AI-based techniques to extract high-quality knowledge about various threat entities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-20T16:13:59Z)
• A System for Automated Open-Source Threat Intelligence Gathering and Management [53.65687495231605]
  SecurityKG is a system for automated OSCTI gathering and management. It uses a combination of AI and NLP techniques to extract high-fidelity knowledge about threat behaviors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-01-19T18:31:35Z)
• Dataset Security for Machine Learning: Data Poisoning, Backdoor Attacks, and Defenses [150.64470864162556]
  This work systematically categorizes and discusses a wide range of dataset vulnerabilities and exploits. In addition to describing various poisoning and backdoor threat models and the relationships among them, we develop their unified taxonomy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-18T22:38:47Z)
• Dos and Don'ts of Machine Learning in Computer Security [74.1816306998445]
  Despite great potential, machine learning in security is prone to subtle pitfalls that undermine its performance. We identify common pitfalls in the design, implementation, and evaluation of learning-based security systems. We propose actionable recommendations to support researchers in avoiding or mitigating the pitfalls where possible.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-19T13:09:31Z)
• Toward Trustworthy AI Development: Mechanisms for Supporting Verifiable Claims [59.64274607533249]
  AI developers need to make verifiable claims to which they can be held accountable. This report suggests various steps that different stakeholders can take to improve the verifiability of claims made about AI systems. We analyze ten mechanisms for this purpose--spanning institutions, software, and hardware--and make recommendations aimed at implementing, exploring, or improving those mechanisms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-15T17:15:35Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.