Accounting for Missing Covariates in Heterogeneous Treatment Estimation

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2410.15655v1
• Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2024 05:47:07 GMT
• Title: Accounting for Missing Covariates in Heterogeneous Treatment Estimation
• Authors: Khurram Yamin, Vibhhu Sharma, Ed Kennedy, Bryan Wilder,
• Abstract summary: We introduce a novel partial identification strategy based on ideas from ecological inference. We show that our framework can produce bounds that are much tighter than would otherwise be possible.
• Score: 17.09751619857397
• License:
• Abstract: Many applications of causal inference require using treatment effects estimated on a study population to make decisions in a separate target population. We consider the challenging setting where there are covariates that are observed in the target population that were not seen in the original study. Our goal is to estimate the tightest possible bounds on heterogeneous treatment effects conditioned on such newly observed covariates. We introduce a novel partial identification strategy based on ideas from ecological inference; the main idea is that estimates of conditional treatment effects for the full covariate set must marginalize correctly when restricted to only the covariates observed in both populations. Furthermore, we introduce a bias-corrected estimator for these bounds and prove that it enjoys fast convergence rates and statistical guarantees (e.g., asymptotic normality). Experimental results on both real and synthetic data demonstrate that our framework can produce bounds that are much tighter than would otherwise be possible.

Related papers

• Causal Inference from Text: Unveiling Interactions between Variables [20.677407402398405]
  Existing methods only account for confounding covariables that affect both treatment and outcome. This bias arises from insufficient consideration of non-confounding covariables. In this work, we aim to mitigate the bias by unveiling interactions between different variables.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-09T11:29:44Z)
• TIC-TAC: A Framework for Improved Covariance Estimation in Deep Heteroscedastic Regression [109.69084997173196]
  Deepscedastic regression involves jointly optimizing the mean and covariance of the predicted distribution using the negative log-likelihood. Recent works show that this may result in sub-optimal convergence due to the challenges associated with covariance estimation. We study two questions: (1) Does the predicted covariance truly capture the randomness of the predicted mean? Our results show that not only does TIC accurately learn the covariance, it additionally facilitates an improved convergence of the negative log-likelihood.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-29T09:54:03Z)
• Model-Agnostic Covariate-Assisted Inference on Partially Identified Causal Effects [2.1638817206926855]
  Many causal estimands are only partially identifiable since they depend on the unobservable joint distribution between potential outcomes. We propose a unified and model-agnostic inferential approach for a wide class of partially identified estimands.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-12T08:17:30Z)
• Proximal Causal Learning of Conditional Average Treatment Effects [0.0]
  We propose a tailored two-stage loss function for learning heterogeneous treatment effects. Our proposed estimator can be implemented by off-the-shelf loss-minimizing machine learning methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-26T02:56:36Z)
• Robust and Agnostic Learning of Conditional Distributional Treatment Effects [62.44901952244514]
  The conditional average treatment effect (CATE) is the best point prediction of individual causal effects. In aggregate analyses, this is usually addressed by measuring distributional treatment effect (DTE) We provide a new robust and model-agnostic methodology for learning the conditional DTE (CDTE) for a wide class of problems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-23T17:40:31Z)
• Treatment Effect Risk: Bounds and Inference [58.442274475425144]
  Since the average treatment effect measures the change in social welfare, even if positive, there is a risk of negative effect on, say, some 10% of the population. In this paper we consider how to nonetheless assess this important risk measure, formalized as the conditional value at risk (CVaR) of the ITE distribution. Some bounds can also be interpreted as summarizing a complex CATE function into a single metric and are of interest independently of being a bound.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-15T17:21:26Z)
• Deconfounding Scores: Feature Representations for Causal Effect Estimation with Weak Overlap [140.98628848491146]
  We introduce deconfounding scores, which induce better overlap without biasing the target of estimation. We show that deconfounding scores satisfy a zero-covariance condition that is identifiable in observed data. In particular, we show that this technique could be an attractive alternative to standard regularizations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-12T18:50:11Z)
• Increasing the efficiency of randomized trial estimates via linear adjustment for a prognostic score [59.75318183140857]
  Estimating causal effects from randomized experiments is central to clinical research. Most methods for historical borrowing achieve reductions in variance by sacrificing strict type-I error rate control.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-17T21:10:10Z)
• Enabling Counterfactual Survival Analysis with Balanced Representations [64.17342727357618]
  Survival data are frequently encountered across diverse medical applications, i.e., drug development, risk profiling, and clinical trials. We propose a theoretically grounded unified framework for counterfactual inference applicable to survival outcomes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-14T01:15:00Z)
• Conformal Inference of Counterfactuals and Individual Treatment Effects [6.810856082577402]
  We propose a conformal inference-based approach that can produce reliable interval estimates for counterfactuals and individual treatment effects. Existing methods suffer from a significant coverage deficit even in simple models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-11T01:03:32Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.