Revealing Hidden Bias in AI: Lessons from Large Language Models
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2410.16927v1
- Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2024 11:58:54 GMT
- Title: Revealing Hidden Bias in AI: Lessons from Large Language Models
- Authors: Django Beatty, Kritsada Masanthia, Teepakorn Kaphol, Niphan Sethi,
- Abstract summary: This study examines biases in candidate interview reports generated by Claude 3.5 Sonnet, GPT-4o, Gemini 1.5, and Llama 3.1 405B.
We evaluate the effectiveness of LLM-based anonymization in reducing these biases.
- Score: 0.0
- License:
- Abstract: As large language models (LLMs) become integral to recruitment processes, concerns about AI-induced bias have intensified. This study examines biases in candidate interview reports generated by Claude 3.5 Sonnet, GPT-4o, Gemini 1.5, and Llama 3.1 405B, focusing on characteristics such as gender, race, and age. We evaluate the effectiveness of LLM-based anonymization in reducing these biases. Findings indicate that while anonymization reduces certain biases, particularly gender bias, the degree of effectiveness varies across models and bias types. Notably, Llama 3.1 405B exhibited the lowest overall bias. Moreover, our methodology of comparing anonymized and non-anonymized data reveals a novel approach to assessing inherent biases in LLMs beyond recruitment applications. This study underscores the importance of careful LLM selection and suggests best practices for minimizing bias in AI applications, promoting fairness and inclusivity.
Related papers
- Actions Speak Louder than Words: Agent Decisions Reveal Implicit Biases in Language Models [10.565316815513235]
Large language models (LLMs) may still exhibit implicit biases when simulating human behavior.
We show that state-of-the-art LLMs exhibit significant sociodemographic disparities in nearly all simulations.
When comparing our findings to real-world disparities reported in empirical studies, we find that the biases we uncovered are directionally aligned but markedly amplified.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-01-29T05:21:31Z) - Explicit vs. Implicit: Investigating Social Bias in Large Language Models through Self-Reflection [5.800102484016876]
Large Language Models (LLMs) have been shown to exhibit various biases and stereotypes in their generated content.
This paper presents a systematic framework grounded in social psychology theories to investigate explicit and implicit biases in LLMs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-01-04T14:08:52Z) - Towards Resource Efficient and Interpretable Bias Mitigation in Large Language Models [1.787433808079955]
Large language models (LLMs) have been observed to perpetuate unwanted biases in training data.
In this paper, we mitigate bias by leveraging small biased and anti-biased expert models to obtain a debiasing signal.
Experiments on mitigating gender, race, and religion biases show a reduction in bias on several local and global bias metrics.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-12-02T16:56:08Z) - How far can bias go? -- Tracing bias from pretraining data to alignment [54.51310112013655]
This study examines the correlation between gender-occupation bias in pre-training data and their manifestation in LLMs.
Our findings reveal that biases present in pre-training data are amplified in model outputs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-11-28T16:20:25Z) - Unboxing Occupational Bias: Grounded Debiasing of LLMs with U.S. Labor Data [9.90951705988724]
Large Language Models (LLM) are prone to inheriting and amplifying societal biases.
LLM bias can have far-reaching consequences, leading to unfair practices and exacerbating social inequalities.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-08-20T23:54:26Z) - The African Woman is Rhythmic and Soulful: An Investigation of Implicit Biases in LLM Open-ended Text Generation [3.9945212716333063]
Implicit biases are significant because they influence the decisions made by Large Language Models (LLMs)
Traditionally, explicit bias tests or embedding-based methods are employed to detect bias, but these approaches can overlook more nuanced, implicit forms of bias.
We introduce two novel psychological-inspired methodologies to reveal and measure implicit biases through prompt-based and decision-making tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-01T13:21:33Z) - Evaluating Implicit Bias in Large Language Models by Attacking From a Psychometric Perspective [66.34066553400108]
We conduct a rigorous evaluation of large language models' implicit bias towards certain demographics.
Inspired by psychometric principles, we propose three attack approaches, i.e., Disguise, Deception, and Teaching.
Our methods can elicit LLMs' inner bias more effectively than competitive baselines.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-20T06:42:08Z) - Preference Fine-Tuning of LLMs Should Leverage Suboptimal, On-Policy Data [102.16105233826917]
Learning from preference labels plays a crucial role in fine-tuning large language models.
There are several distinct approaches for preference fine-tuning, including supervised learning, on-policy reinforcement learning (RL), and contrastive learning.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-22T17:20:18Z) - GPTBIAS: A Comprehensive Framework for Evaluating Bias in Large Language
Models [83.30078426829627]
Large language models (LLMs) have gained popularity and are being widely adopted by a large user community.
The existing evaluation methods have many constraints, and their results exhibit a limited degree of interpretability.
We propose a bias evaluation framework named GPTBIAS that leverages the high performance of LLMs to assess bias in models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-12-11T12:02:14Z) - Exploring the Jungle of Bias: Political Bias Attribution in Language Models via Dependency Analysis [86.49858739347412]
Large Language Models (LLMs) have sparked intense debate regarding the prevalence of bias in these models and its mitigation.
We propose a prompt-based method for the extraction of confounding and mediating attributes which contribute to the decision process.
We find that the observed disparate treatment can at least in part be attributed to confounding and mitigating attributes and model misalignment.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-15T00:02:25Z) - Balancing out Bias: Achieving Fairness Through Training Reweighting [58.201275105195485]
Bias in natural language processing arises from models learning characteristics of the author such as gender and race.
Existing methods for mitigating and measuring bias do not directly account for correlations between author demographics and linguistic variables.
This paper introduces a very simple but highly effective method for countering bias using instance reweighting.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-09-16T23:40:28Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.