Securing Federated Learning Against Novel and Classic Backdoor Threats During Foundation Model Integration

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2410.17573v1
• Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2024 05:54:41 GMT
• Title: Securing Federated Learning Against Novel and Classic Backdoor Threats During Foundation Model Integration
• Authors: Xiaohuan Bi, Xi Li,
• Abstract summary: Federated learning (FL) enables decentralized model training while preserving privacy. Recently, integrating Foundation Models (FMs) into FL has boosted performance but also introduced a novel backdoor attack mechanism. We propose a novel data-free defense strategy by constraining abnormal activations in the hidden feature space during model aggregation on the server.
• Score: 8.191214701984162
• License:
• Abstract: Federated learning (FL) enables decentralized model training while preserving privacy. Recently, integrating Foundation Models (FMs) into FL has boosted performance but also introduced a novel backdoor attack mechanism. Attackers can exploit the FM's capabilities to embed backdoors into synthetic data generated by FMs used for model fusion, subsequently infecting all client models through knowledge sharing without involvement in the long-lasting FL process. These novel attacks render existing FL backdoor defenses ineffective, as they primarily detect anomalies among client updates, which may appear uniformly malicious under this attack. Our work proposes a novel data-free defense strategy by constraining abnormal activations in the hidden feature space during model aggregation on the server. The activation constraints, optimized using synthetic data alongside FL training, mitigate the attack while barely affecting model performance, as the parameters remain untouched. Extensive experiments demonstrate its effectiveness against both novel and classic backdoor attacks, outperforming existing defenses while maintaining model performance.

Related papers

• BadSFL: Backdoor Attack against Scaffold Federated Learning [16.104941796138128]
  Federated learning (FL) enables the training of deep learning models on distributed clients to preserve data privacy. BadSFL is a novel backdoor attack method designed for the FL framework using the scaffold aggregation algorithm in non-IID settings. BadSFL is effective over 60 rounds in the global model and up to 3 times longer than existing baseline attacks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-25T07:46:57Z)
• Concealing Backdoor Model Updates in Federated Learning by Trigger-Optimized Data Poisoning [20.69655306650485]
  Federated Learning (FL) is a decentralized machine learning method that enables participants to collaboratively train a model without sharing their private data. Despite its privacy and scalability benefits, FL is susceptible to backdoor attacks. We propose DPOT, a backdoor attack strategy in FL that dynamically constructs backdoor objectives by optimizing a backdoor trigger.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-10T02:44:25Z)
• FreqFed: A Frequency Analysis-Based Approach for Mitigating Poisoning Attacks in Federated Learning [98.43475653490219]
  Federated learning (FL) is susceptible to poisoning attacks. FreqFed is a novel aggregation mechanism that transforms the model updates into the frequency domain. We demonstrate that FreqFed can mitigate poisoning attacks effectively with a negligible impact on the utility of the aggregated model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-07T16:56:24Z)
• Data-Agnostic Model Poisoning against Federated Learning: A Graph Autoencoder Approach [65.2993866461477]
  This paper proposes a data-agnostic, model poisoning attack on Federated Learning (FL) The attack requires no knowledge of FL training data and achieves both effectiveness and undetectability. Experiments show that the FL accuracy drops gradually under the proposed attack and existing defense mechanisms fail to detect it.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-30T12:19:10Z)
• FedDefender: Client-Side Attack-Tolerant Federated Learning [60.576073964874]
  Federated learning enables learning from decentralized data sources without compromising privacy. It is vulnerable to model poisoning attacks, where malicious clients interfere with the training process. We propose a new defense mechanism that focuses on the client-side, called FedDefender, to help benign clients train robust local models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-18T08:00:41Z)
• Avoid Adversarial Adaption in Federated Learning by Multi-Metric Investigations [55.2480439325792]
  Federated Learning (FL) facilitates decentralized machine learning model training, preserving data privacy, lowering communication costs, and boosting model performance through diversified data sources. FL faces vulnerabilities such as poisoning attacks, undermining model integrity with both untargeted performance degradation and targeted backdoor attacks. We define a new notion of strong adaptive adversaries, capable of adapting to multiple objectives simultaneously. MESAS is the first defense robust against strong adaptive adversaries, effective in real-world data scenarios, with an average overhead of just 24.37 seconds.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-06T11:44:42Z)
• Mitigating Backdoors in Federated Learning with FLD [7.908496863030483]
  Federated learning allows clients to collaboratively train a global model without uploading raw data for privacy preservation. This feature has recently been found responsible for federated learning's vulnerability in the face of backdoor attacks. We propose Federated Layer Detection (FLD), a novel model filtering approach for effectively defending against backdoor attacks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-01T07:54:54Z)
• CrowdGuard: Federated Backdoor Detection in Federated Learning [39.58317527488534]
  This paper presents a novel defense mechanism, CrowdGuard, that effectively mitigates backdoor attacks in Federated Learning. CrowdGuard employs a server-located stacked clustering scheme to enhance its resilience to rogue client feedback. The evaluation results demonstrate that CrowdGuard achieves a 100% True-Positive-Rate and True-Negative-Rate across various scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-14T11:27:49Z)
• RelaxLoss: Defending Membership Inference Attacks without Losing Utility [68.48117818874155]
  We propose a novel training framework based on a relaxed loss with a more achievable learning target. RelaxLoss is applicable to any classification model with added benefits of easy implementation and negligible overhead. Our approach consistently outperforms state-of-the-art defense mechanisms in terms of resilience against MIAs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-12T19:34:47Z)
• Do Gradient Inversion Attacks Make Federated Learning Unsafe? [70.0231254112197]
  Federated learning (FL) allows the collaborative training of AI models without needing to share raw data. Recent works on the inversion of deep neural networks from model gradients raised concerns about the security of FL in preventing the leakage of training data. In this work, we show that these attacks presented in the literature are impractical in real FL use-cases and provide a new baseline attack.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-14T18:33:12Z)
• BlockFLA: Accountable Federated Learning via Hybrid Blockchain Architecture [11.908715869667445]
  Federated Learning (FL) is a distributed, and decentralized machine learning protocol. It has been shown that an attacker can inject backdoors to the trained model during FL. We develop a hybrid blockchain-based FL framework that uses smart contracts to automatically detect, and punish the attackers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-14T22:43:39Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.