Is Smoothness the Key to Robustness? A Comparison of Attention and Convolution Models Using a Novel Metric

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2410.17628v2
• Date: Sun, 24 Nov 2024 13:38:56 GMT
• Title: Is Smoothness the Key to Robustness? A Comparison of Attention and Convolution Models Using a Novel Metric
• Authors: Baiyuan Chen,
• Abstract summary: Existing robustness evaluation approaches often lack theoretical generality or rely heavily on empirical assessments. We propose TopoLip, a metric based on layer-wise analysis that bridges topological data analysis and Lipschitz continuity for robustness evaluation.
• Score: 0.0
• License:
• Abstract: Robustness is a critical aspect of machine learning models. Existing robustness evaluation approaches often lack theoretical generality or rely heavily on empirical assessments, limiting insights into the structural factors contributing to robustness. Moreover, theoretical robustness analysis is not applicable for direct comparisons between models. To address these challenges, we propose $\textit{TopoLip}$, a metric based on layer-wise analysis that bridges topological data analysis and Lipschitz continuity for robustness evaluation. TopoLip provides a unified framework for both theoretical and empirical robustness comparisons across different architectures or configurations, and it reveals how model parameters influence the robustness of models. Using TopoLip, we demonstrate that attention-based models typically exhibit smoother transformations and greater robustness compared to convolution-based models, as validated through theoretical analysis and adversarial tasks. Our findings establish a connection between architectural design, robustness, and topological properties.

Related papers

• Assessing Robustness of Machine Learning Models using Covariate Perturbations [0.6749750044497732]
  This paper proposes a comprehensive framework for assessing the robustness of machine learning models. We explore various perturbation strategies to assess robustness and examine their impact on model predictions. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach in comparing robustness across models, identifying the instabilities in the model, and enhancing model robustness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-02T14:41:36Z)
• Isomorphic Pruning for Vision Models [56.286064975443026]
  Structured pruning reduces the computational overhead of deep neural networks by removing redundant sub-structures. We present Isomorphic Pruning, a simple approach that demonstrates effectiveness across a range of network architectures.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-05T16:14:53Z)
• Understanding the differences in Foundation Models: Attention, State Space Models, and Recurrent Neural Networks [50.29356570858905]
  We introduce the Dynamical Systems Framework (DSF), which allows a principled investigation of all these architectures in a common representation. We provide principled comparisons between softmax attention and other model classes, discussing the theoretical conditions under which softmax attention can be approximated. This shows the DSF's potential to guide the systematic development of future more efficient and scalable foundation models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-24T17:19:57Z)
• On the Robustness of Aspect-based Sentiment Analysis: Rethinking Model, Data, and Training [109.9218185711916]
  Aspect-based sentiment analysis (ABSA) aims at automatically inferring the specific sentiment polarities toward certain aspects of products or services behind social media texts or reviews. We propose to enhance the ABSA robustness by systematically rethinking the bottlenecks from all possible angles, including model, data, and training.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-19T11:07:43Z)
• Provable Robust Saliency-based Explanations [16.217374556142484]
  We show that R2ET attains higher explanation robustness under stealthy attacks while retaining model accuracy. Experiments with a wide spectrum of network architectures and data modalities demonstrate that R2ET attains higher explanation robustness under stealthy attacks while retaining model accuracy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-28T22:05:32Z)
• Fairness Increases Adversarial Vulnerability [50.90773979394264]
  This paper shows the existence of a dichotomy between fairness and robustness, and analyzes when achieving fairness decreases the model robustness to adversarial samples. Experiments on non-linear models and different architectures validate the theoretical findings in multiple vision domains. The paper proposes a simple, yet effective, solution to construct models achieving good tradeoffs between fairness and robustness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-21T19:55:35Z)
• Deep Grey-Box Modeling With Adaptive Data-Driven Models Toward Trustworthy Estimation of Theory-Driven Models [88.63781315038824]
  We present a framework that enables us to analyze a regularizer's behavior empirically with a slight change in the neural net's architecture and the training objective.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-24T10:42:26Z)
• "Understanding Robustness Lottery": A Geometric Visual Comparative Analysis of Neural Network Pruning Approaches [29.048660060344574]
  This work aims to shed light on how different pruning methods alter the network's internal feature representation and the corresponding impact on model performance. We introduce a visual geometric analysis of feature representations to compare and highlight the impact of pruning on model performance and feature representation. The proposed tool provides an environment for in-depth comparison of pruning methods and a comprehensive understanding of how model response to common data corruption.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-16T04:44:13Z)
• Clustering Effect of (Linearized) Adversarial Robust Models [60.25668525218051]
  We propose a novel understanding of adversarial robustness and apply it on more tasks including domain adaption and robustness boosting. Experimental evaluations demonstrate the rationality and superiority of our proposed clustering strategy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-25T05:51:03Z)
• Enhancing Model Robustness and Fairness with Causality: A Regularization Approach [15.981724441808147]
  Recent work has raised concerns on the risk of spurious correlations and unintended biases in machine learning models. We propose a simple and intuitive regularization approach to integrate causal knowledge during model training. We build a predictive model that relies more on causal features and less on non-causal features.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-03T02:49:33Z)
• How to compare adversarial robustness of classifiers from a global perspective [0.0]
  Adversarial attacks undermine the reliability of and trust in machine learning models. Point-wise measures for specific threat models are currently the most popular tool for comparing the robustness of classifiers. In this work, we use recently proposed robustness curves to show that point-wise measures fail to capture important global properties.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-22T22:07:49Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.