Benchmarking Foundation Models on Exceptional Cases: Dataset Creation and Validation

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2410.18001v1
• Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2024 16:24:23 GMT
• Title: Benchmarking Foundation Models on Exceptional Cases: Dataset Creation and Validation
• Authors: Suho Kang, Jungyang Park, Joonseo Ha, SoMin Kim, JinHyeong Kim, Subeen Park, Kyungwoo Song,
• Abstract summary: This paper develops a novel dataset for evaluation of FMs across multiple modalities, including graphic novels, calligraphy, news articles, and lyrics. It includes tasks for instance classification, character recognition, token prediction, and text generation. The paper also proposes prompt engineering techniques like Chain-of-Few (CoT) and CoT+Thought-Shot to enhance performance.
• Score: 11.562935582384098
• License:
• Abstract: Foundation models (FMs) have achieved significant success across various tasks, leading to research on benchmarks for reasoning abilities. However, there is a lack of studies on FMs performance in exceptional scenarios, which we define as out-of-distribution (OOD) reasoning tasks. This paper is the first to address these cases, developing a novel dataset for evaluation of FMs across multiple modalities, including graphic novels, calligraphy, news articles, and lyrics. It includes tasks for instance classification, character recognition, token prediction, and text generation. The paper also proposes prompt engineering techniques like Chain-of-Thought (CoT) and CoT+Few-Shot to enhance performance. Validation of FMs using various methods revealed improvements. The code repository is accessible at: https://github.com/MLAI-Yonsei/ExceptionalBenchmark

Related papers

• Context is Key: A Benchmark for Forecasting with Essential Textual Information [87.3175915185287]
  "Context is Key" (CiK) is a time series forecasting benchmark that pairs numerical data with diverse types of carefully crafted textual context. We evaluate a range of approaches, including statistical models, time series foundation models, and LLM-based forecasters. Our experiments highlight the importance of incorporating contextual information, demonstrate surprising performance when using LLM-based forecasting models, and also reveal some of their critical shortcomings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-24T17:56:08Z)
• Foundation Model or Finetune? Evaluation of few-shot semantic segmentation for river pollution [16.272314073324626]
  Foundation models (FMs) are a popular topic of research in AI. In this work, we compare the performance of FMs to finetuned pre-trained supervised models in the task of semantic segmentation. We see that finetuned models consistently outperform the FMs tested, even in cases were data is scarce.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-05T17:59:32Z)
• Improving embedding with contrastive fine-tuning on small datasets with expert-augmented scores [12.86467344792873]
  The proposed method uses soft labels derived from expert-augmented scores to fine-tune embedding models. The paper evaluates the method using a Q&A dataset from an online shopping website and eight expert models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-19T01:59:25Z)
• On the Evaluation Consistency of Attribution-based Explanations [42.1421504321572]
  We introduce Meta-Rank, an open platform for benchmarking attribution methods in the image domain. Our benchmark reveals three insights in attribution evaluation endeavors: 1) evaluating attribution methods under disparate settings can yield divergent performance rankings; 2) although inconsistent across numerous cases, the performance rankings exhibit remarkable consistency across distinct checkpoints along the same training trajectory; and 3) prior attempts at consistent evaluation fare no better than baselines when extended to more heterogeneous models and datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-28T11:49:06Z)
• Learn From Model Beyond Fine-Tuning: A Survey [78.80920533793595]
  Learn From Model (LFM) focuses on the research, modification, and design of foundation models (FM) based on the model interface. The study of LFM techniques can be broadly categorized into five major areas: model tuning, model distillation, model reuse, meta learning and model editing. This paper gives a comprehensive review of the current methods based on FM from the perspective of LFM.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-12T10:20:36Z)
• WeCheck: Strong Factual Consistency Checker via Weakly Supervised Learning [40.5830891229718]
  We propose a weakly supervised framework that aggregates multiple resources to train a precise and efficient factual metric, namely WeCheck. Comprehensive experiments on a variety of tasks demonstrate the strong performance of WeCheck, which achieves a 3.4% absolute improvement over previous state-of-the-art methods on TRUE benchmark on average.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-20T08:04:36Z)
• FETA: Towards Specializing Foundation Models for Expert Task Applications [49.57393504125937]
  Foundation Models (FMs) have demonstrated unprecedented capabilities including zero-shot learning, high fidelity data synthesis, and out of domain generalization. We show in this paper that FMs still have poor out-of-the-box performance on expert tasks. We propose a first of its kind FETA benchmark built around the task of teaching FMs to understand technical documentation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-08T08:47:57Z)
• A Closer Look at Debiased Temporal Sentence Grounding in Videos: Dataset, Metric, and Approach [53.727460222955266]
  Temporal Sentence Grounding in Videos (TSGV) aims to ground a natural language sentence in an untrimmed video. Recent studies have found that current benchmark datasets may have obvious moment annotation biases. We introduce a new evaluation metric "dR@n,IoU@m" that discounts the basic recall scores to alleviate the inflating evaluation caused by biased datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-10T08:58:18Z)
• Structured Multimodal Attentions for TextVQA [57.71060302874151]
  We propose an end-to-end structured multimodal attention (SMA) neural network to mainly solve the first two issues above. SMA first uses a structural graph representation to encode the object-object, object-text and text-text relationships appearing in the image, and then designs a multimodal graph attention network to reason over it. Our proposed model outperforms the SoTA models on TextVQA dataset and two tasks of ST-VQA dataset among all models except pre-training based TAP.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-01T07:07:36Z)
• Meta-Learned Confidence for Few-shot Learning [60.6086305523402]
  A popular transductive inference technique for few-shot metric-based approaches, is to update the prototype of each class with the mean of the most confident query examples. We propose to meta-learn the confidence for each query sample, to assign optimal weights to unlabeled queries. We validate our few-shot learning model with meta-learned confidence on four benchmark datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-27T10:22:17Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.