Uncertainty-Error correlations in Evidential Deep Learning models for biomedical segmentation

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2410.18461v1
• Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2024 06:16:04 GMT
• Title: Uncertainty-Error correlations in Evidential Deep Learning models for biomedical segmentation
• Authors: Hai Siong Tan, Kuancheng Wang, Rafe Mcbeth,
• Abstract summary: Evidential Deep Learning is applied in the context of biomedical image segmentation. We found that Evidential Deep Learning models with U-Net backbones generally yielded superior correlations between prediction errors and uncertainties. These superior features of EDL models render them well-suited for segmentation tasks that warrant a critical sensitivity in detecting large model errors.
• Score: 0.0
• License:
• Abstract: In this work, we examine the effectiveness of an uncertainty quantification framework known as Evidential Deep Learning applied in the context of biomedical image segmentation. This class of models involves assigning Dirichlet distributions as priors for segmentation labels, and enables a few distinct definitions of model uncertainties. Using the cardiac and prostate MRI images available in the Medical Segmentation Decathlon for validation, we found that Evidential Deep Learning models with U-Net backbones generally yielded superior correlations between prediction errors and uncertainties relative to the conventional baseline equipped with Shannon entropy measure, Monte-Carlo Dropout and Deep Ensemble methods. We also examined these models' effectiveness in active learning, finding that relative to the standard Shannon entropy-based sampling, they yielded higher point-biserial uncertainty-error correlations while attaining similar performances in Dice-Sorensen coefficients. These superior features of EDL models render them well-suited for segmentation tasks that warrant a critical sensitivity in detecting large model errors.

Related papers

• Deep Evidential Learning for Radiotherapy Dose Prediction [0.0]
  We present a novel application of an uncertainty-quantification framework called Deep Evidential Learning in the domain of radiotherapy dose prediction. We found that this model can be effectively harnessed to yield uncertainty estimates that inherited correlations with prediction errors upon completion of network training.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-26T02:43:45Z)
• DiffSeg: A Segmentation Model for Skin Lesions Based on Diffusion Difference [2.9082809324784082]
  We introduce DiffSeg, a segmentation model for skin lesions based on diffusion difference. Its multi-output capability mimics doctors' annotation behavior, facilitating the visualization of segmentation result consistency and ambiguity. We demonstrate the effectiveness of DiffSeg on the ISIC 2018 Challenge dataset, outperforming state-of-the-art U-Net-based methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-25T09:57:52Z)
• A PAC-Bayesian Perspective on the Interpolating Information Criterion [54.548058449535155]
  We show how a PAC-Bayes bound is obtained for a general class of models, characterizing factors which influence performance in the interpolating regime. We quantify how the test error for overparameterized models achieving effectively zero training error depends on the quality of the implicit regularization imposed by e.g. the combination of model, parameter-initialization scheme.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-13T01:48:08Z)
• Towards Better Certified Segmentation via Diffusion Models [62.21617614504225]
  segmentation models can be vulnerable to adversarial perturbations, which hinders their use in critical-decision systems like healthcare or autonomous driving. Recently, randomized smoothing has been proposed to certify segmentation predictions by adding Gaussian noise to the input to obtain theoretical guarantees. In this paper, we address the problem of certifying segmentation prediction using a combination of randomized smoothing and diffusion models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-16T16:30:39Z)
• Mitigating Spurious Correlations in Multi-modal Models during Fine-tuning [18.45898471459533]
  Spurious correlations that degrade model generalization or lead the model to be right for the wrong reasons are one of the main robustness concerns for real-world deployments. This paper proposes a novel approach to address spurious correlations during fine-tuning for a given domain of interest.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-08T05:20:33Z)
• Causal Inference via Nonlinear Variable Decorrelation for Healthcare Applications [60.26261850082012]
  We introduce a novel method with a variable decorrelation regularizer to handle both linear and nonlinear confounding. We employ association rules as new representations using association rule mining based on the original features to increase model interpretability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-29T17:44:14Z)
• Deep Stable Representation Learning on Electronic Health Records [8.256340233221112]
  Causal Healthcare Embedding (CHE) aims at eliminating the spurious statistical relationship by removing the dependencies between diagnoses and procedures. Our proposed CHE method can be used as a flexible plug-and-play module that can enhance existing deep learning models on EHR.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-03T04:10:45Z)
• ER: Equivariance Regularizer for Knowledge Graph Completion [107.51609402963072]
  We propose a new regularizer, namely, Equivariance Regularizer (ER) ER can enhance the generalization ability of the model by employing the semantic equivariance between the head and tail entities. The experimental results indicate a clear and substantial improvement over the state-of-the-art relation prediction methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-24T08:18:05Z)
• Trustworthy Medical Segmentation with Uncertainty Estimation [0.7829352305480285]
  This paper introduces a new Bayesian deep learning framework for uncertainty quantification in segmentation neural networks. We evaluate the proposed framework on medical image segmentation data from Magnetic Resonances Imaging and Computed Tomography scans. Our experiments on multiple benchmark datasets demonstrate that the proposed framework is more robust to noise and adversarial attacks as compared to state-of-the-art segmentation models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-10T22:46:05Z)
• Counterfactual Maximum Likelihood Estimation for Training Deep Networks [83.44219640437657]
  Deep learning models are prone to learning spurious correlations that should not be learned as predictive clues. We propose a causality-based training framework to reduce the spurious correlations caused by observable confounders. We conduct experiments on two real-world tasks: Natural Language Inference (NLI) and Image Captioning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-07T17:47:16Z)
• Good Classifiers are Abundant in the Interpolating Regime [64.72044662855612]
  We develop a methodology to compute precisely the full distribution of test errors among interpolating classifiers. We find that test errors tend to concentrate around a small typical value $varepsilon*$, which deviates substantially from the test error of worst-case interpolating model. Our results show that the usual style of analysis in statistical learning theory may not be fine-grained enough to capture the good generalization performance observed in practice.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-22T21:12:31Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.