Stealthy Jailbreak Attacks on Large Language Models via Benign Data Mirroring
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2410.21083v1
- Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2024 14:48:05 GMT
- Title: Stealthy Jailbreak Attacks on Large Language Models via Benign Data Mirroring
- Authors: Honglin Mu, Han He, Yuxin Zhou, Yunlong Feng, Yang Xu, Libo Qin, Xiaoming Shi, Zeming Liu, Xudong Han, Qi Shi, Qingfu Zhu, Wanxiang Che,
- Abstract summary: We propose an improved transfer attack method that guides malicious prompt construction by locally training a mirror model of the target black-box model through benign data distillation.
Our approach achieved a maximum attack success rate of 92%, or a balanced value of 80% with an average of 1.5 detectable jailbreak queries per sample against GPT-3.5 Turbo.
- Score: 47.40698758003993
- License:
- Abstract: Large language model (LLM) safety is a critical issue, with numerous studies employing red team testing to enhance model security. Among these, jailbreak methods explore potential vulnerabilities by crafting malicious prompts that induce model outputs contrary to safety alignments. Existing black-box jailbreak methods often rely on model feedback, repeatedly submitting queries with detectable malicious instructions during the attack search process. Although these approaches are effective, the attacks may be intercepted by content moderators during the search process. We propose an improved transfer attack method that guides malicious prompt construction by locally training a mirror model of the target black-box model through benign data distillation. This method offers enhanced stealth, as it does not involve submitting identifiable malicious instructions to the target model during the search phase. Our approach achieved a maximum attack success rate of 92%, or a balanced value of 80% with an average of 1.5 detectable jailbreak queries per sample against GPT-3.5 Turbo on a subset of AdvBench. These results underscore the need for more robust defense mechanisms.
Related papers
- Deciphering the Chaos: Enhancing Jailbreak Attacks via Adversarial Prompt Translation [71.92055093709924]
We propose a novel method that "translates" garbled adversarial prompts into coherent and human-readable natural language adversarial prompts.
It also offers a new approach to discovering effective designs for jailbreak prompts, advancing the understanding of jailbreak attacks.
Our method achieves over 90% attack success rates against Llama-2-Chat models on AdvBench, despite their outstanding resistance to jailbreak attacks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-15T06:31:04Z) - You Know What I'm Saying: Jailbreak Attack via Implicit Reference [22.520950422702757]
This study identifies a previously overlooked vulnerability, which we term Attack via Implicit Reference (AIR)
AIR decomposes a malicious objective into permissible objectives and links them through implicit references within the context.
Our experiments demonstrate AIR's effectiveness across state-of-the-art LLMs, achieving an attack success rate (ASR) exceeding 90% on most models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-04T18:42:57Z) - MoJE: Mixture of Jailbreak Experts, Naive Tabular Classifiers as Guard for Prompt Attacks [2.873719680183099]
This paper advocates for the significance of jailbreak attack prevention on Large Language Models (LLMs)
We introduce MoJE, a novel guardrail architecture designed to surpass current limitations in existing state-of-the-art guardrails.
MoJE excels in detecting jailbreak attacks while maintaining minimal computational overhead during model inference.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-09-26T10:12:19Z) - AdaPPA: Adaptive Position Pre-Fill Jailbreak Attack Approach Targeting LLMs [34.221522224051846]
We propose an adaptive position pre-fill jailbreak attack approach for executing jailbreak attacks on Large Language Models (LLMs)
Our method leverages the model's instruction-following capabilities to first output safe content, then exploits its narrative-shifting abilities to generate harmful content.
Our method can improve the attack success rate by 47% on the widely recognized secure model (Llama2) compared to existing approaches.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-09-11T00:00:58Z) - Prefix Guidance: A Steering Wheel for Large Language Models to Defend Against Jailbreak Attacks [27.11523234556414]
We propose a plug-and-play and easy-to-deploy jailbreak defense framework, namely Prefix Guidance (PG)
PG guides the model to identify harmful prompts by directly setting the first few tokens of the model's output.
We demonstrate the effectiveness of PG across three models and five attack methods.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-08-15T14:51:32Z) - A StrongREJECT for Empty Jailbreaks [72.8807309802266]
StrongREJECT is a high-quality benchmark for evaluating jailbreak performance.
It scores the harmfulness of a victim model's responses to forbidden prompts.
It achieves state-of-the-art agreement with human judgments of jailbreak effectiveness.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-15T18:58:09Z) - Weak-to-Strong Jailbreaking on Large Language Models [96.50953637783581]
Large language models (LLMs) are vulnerable to jailbreak attacks.
Existing jailbreaking methods are computationally costly.
We propose the weak-to-strong jailbreaking attack.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-01-30T18:48:37Z) - Jailbroken: How Does LLM Safety Training Fail? [92.8748773632051]
"jailbreak" attacks on early releases of ChatGPT elicit undesired behavior.
We investigate why such attacks succeed and how they can be created.
New attacks utilizing our failure modes succeed on every prompt in a collection of unsafe requests.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-07-05T17:58:10Z) - DRSM: De-Randomized Smoothing on Malware Classifier Providing Certified
Robustness [58.23214712926585]
We develop a certified defense, DRSM (De-Randomized Smoothed MalConv), by redesigning the de-randomized smoothing technique for the domain of malware detection.
Specifically, we propose a window ablation scheme to provably limit the impact of adversarial bytes while maximally preserving local structures of the executables.
We are the first to offer certified robustness in the realm of static detection of malware executables.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-03-20T17:25:22Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.