Comparing Fairness of Generative Mobility Models

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2411.04453v1
• Date: Thu, 07 Nov 2024 06:01:12 GMT
• Title: Comparing Fairness of Generative Mobility Models
• Authors: Daniel Wang, Jack McFarland, Afra Mashhadi, Ekin Ugurel,
• Abstract summary: This work examines the fairness of generative mobility models, addressing the often overlooked dimension of equity in model performance across geographic regions. Predictive models built on crowd flow data are instrumental in understanding urban structures and movement patterns. We propose a novel framework for assessing fairness by measuring utility and equity of generated traces.
• Score: 3.699135947901772
• License:
• Abstract: This work examines the fairness of generative mobility models, addressing the often overlooked dimension of equity in model performance across geographic regions. Predictive models built on crowd flow data are instrumental in understanding urban structures and movement patterns; however, they risk embedding biases, particularly in spatiotemporal contexts where model performance may reflect and reinforce existing inequities tied to geographic distribution. We propose a novel framework for assessing fairness by measuring the utility and equity of generated traces. Utility is assessed via the Common Part of Commuters (CPC), a similarity metric comparing generated and real mobility flows, while fairness is evaluated using demographic parity. By reformulating demographic parity to reflect the difference in CPC distribution between two groups, our analysis reveals disparities in how various models encode biases present in the underlying data. We utilized four models (Gravity, Radiation, Deep Gravity, and Non-linear Gravity) and our results indicate that traditional gravity and radiation models produce fairer outcomes, although Deep Gravity achieves higher CPC. This disparity underscores a trade-off between model accuracy and equity, with the feature-rich Deep Gravity model amplifying pre-existing biases in community representations. Our findings emphasize the importance of integrating fairness metrics in mobility modeling to avoid perpetuating inequities.

Related papers

• MITA: Bridging the Gap between Model and Data for Test-time Adaptation [68.62509948690698]
  Test-Time Adaptation (TTA) has emerged as a promising paradigm for enhancing the generalizability of models. We propose Meet-In-The-Middle based MITA, which introduces energy-based optimization to encourage mutual adaptation of the model and data from opposing directions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-12T07:02:33Z)
• Bias Begets Bias: The Impact of Biased Embeddings on Diffusion Models [0.0]
  Text-to-Image (TTI) systems have come under increased scrutiny for social biases. We investigate embedding spaces as a source of bias for TTI models. We find that biased multimodal embeddings like CLIP can result in lower alignment scores for representationally balanced TTI models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-15T01:09:55Z)
• Quantifying Distribution Shifts and Uncertainties for Enhanced Model Robustness in Machine Learning Applications [0.0]
  This study explores model adaptation and generalization by utilizing synthetic data. We employ quantitative measures such as Kullback-Leibler divergence, Jensen-Shannon distance, and Mahalanobis distance to assess data similarity. Our findings suggest that utilizing statistical measures, such as the Mahalanobis distance, to determine whether model predictions fall within the low-error "interpolation regime" or the high-error "extrapolation regime" provides a complementary method for assessing distribution shift and model uncertainty.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-03T10:05:31Z)
• Aggregation Weighting of Federated Learning via Generalization Bound Estimation [65.8630966842025]
  Federated Learning (FL) typically aggregates client model parameters using a weighting approach determined by sample proportions. We replace the aforementioned weighting method with a new strategy that considers the generalization bounds of each local model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-10T08:50:28Z)
• Toward Fair Facial Expression Recognition with Improved Distribution Alignment [19.442685015494316]
  We present a novel approach to mitigate bias in facial expression recognition (FER) models. Our method aims to reduce sensitive attribute information such as gender, age, or race, in the embeddings produced by FER models. For the first time, we analyze the notion of attractiveness as an important sensitive attribute in FER models and demonstrate that FER models can indeed exhibit biases towards more attractive faces.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-11T14:59:20Z)
• Non-Invasive Fairness in Learning through the Lens of Data Drift [88.37640805363317]
  We show how to improve the fairness of Machine Learning models without altering the data or the learning algorithm. We use a simple but key insight: the divergence of trends between different populations, and, consecutively, between a learned model and minority populations, is analogous to data drift. We explore two strategies (model-splitting and reweighing) to resolve this drift, aiming to improve the overall conformance of models to the underlying data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-30T17:30:42Z)
• The Unbearable Weight of Massive Privilege: Revisiting Bias-Variance Trade-Offs in the Context of Fair Prediction [7.975779552420981]
  We propose a conditional-iid (ciid) model that seeks to improve on the trade-offs made by a single model. We empirically test our setup on the COMPAS and folktables datasets. Our analysis suggests that there might be principled procedures and concrete real-world use cases under which conditional models are preferred.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-17T05:34:35Z)
• General Greedy De-bias Learning [163.65789778416172]
  We propose a General Greedy De-bias learning framework (GGD), which greedily trains the biased models and the base model like gradient descent in functional space. GGD can learn a more robust base model under the settings of both task-specific biased models with prior knowledge and self-ensemble biased model without prior knowledge.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-20T14:47:32Z)
• Harnessing Perceptual Adversarial Patches for Crowd Counting [92.79051296850405]
  Crowd counting is vulnerable to adversarial examples in the physical world. This paper proposes the Perceptual Adrial Patch (PAP) generation framework to learn the shared perceptual features between models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-16T13:51:39Z)
• Accuracy on the Line: On the Strong Correlation Between Out-of-Distribution and In-Distribution Generalization [89.73665256847858]
  We show that out-of-distribution performance is strongly correlated with in-distribution performance for a wide range of models and distribution shifts. Specifically, we demonstrate strong correlations between in-distribution and out-of-distribution performance on variants of CIFAR-10 & ImageNet. We also investigate cases where the correlation is weaker, for instance some synthetic distribution shifts from CIFAR-10-C and the tissue classification dataset Camelyon17-WILDS.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-09T19:48:23Z)
• Fairness by Explicability and Adversarial SHAP Learning [0.0]
  We propose a new definition of fairness that emphasises the role of an external auditor and model explicability. We develop a framework for mitigating model bias using regularizations constructed from the SHAP values of an adversarial surrogate model. We demonstrate our approaches using gradient and adaptive boosting on: a synthetic dataset, the UCI Adult (Census) dataset and a real-world credit scoring dataset.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-03-11T14:36:34Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.