Balancing Power and Ethics: A Framework for Addressing Human Rights Concerns in Military AI

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2411.06336v1
• Date: Sun, 10 Nov 2024 02:27:01 GMT
• Title: Balancing Power and Ethics: A Framework for Addressing Human Rights Concerns in Military AI
• Authors: Mst Rafia Islam, Azmine Toushik Wasi,
• Abstract summary: We propose a three-stage framework for evaluating human rights concerns in the design, deployment, and use of military AI. By this framework, we aim to balance the advantages of AI in military operations with the need to protect human rights.
• Score: 0.0
• License:
• Abstract: AI has made significant strides recently, leading to various applications in both civilian and military sectors. The military sees AI as a solution for developing more effective and faster technologies. While AI offers benefits like improved operational efficiency and precision targeting, it also raises serious ethical and legal concerns, particularly regarding human rights violations. Autonomous weapons that make decisions without human input can threaten the right to life and violate international humanitarian law. To address these issues, we propose a three-stage framework (Design, In Deployment, and During/After Use) for evaluating human rights concerns in the design, deployment, and use of military AI. Each phase includes multiple components that address various concerns specific to that phase, ranging from bias and regulatory issues to violations of International Humanitarian Law. By this framework, we aim to balance the advantages of AI in military operations with the need to protect human rights.

Related papers

• Spotlight Session on Autonomous Weapons Systems at ICRC 34th International Conference [0.0]
  Governments are responsible for setting requirements for weapons systems. They are responsible for driving ethicality as well as lethality. The UN can advocate for compliance with IHL, human rights, human-centred use of weapons systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-28T05:36:41Z)
• Problem Solving Through Human-AI Preference-Based Cooperation [74.39233146428492]
  We propose HAI-Co2, a novel human-AI co-construction framework. We formalize HAI-Co2 and discuss the difficult open research problems that it faces. We present a case study of HAI-Co2 and demonstrate its efficacy compared to monolithic generative AI models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-14T11:06:57Z)
• Combining AI Control Systems and Human Decision Support via Robustness and Criticality [53.10194953873209]
  We extend a methodology for adversarial explanations (AE) to state-of-the-art reinforcement learning frameworks. We show that the learned AI control system demonstrates robustness against adversarial tampering. In a training / learning framework, this technology can improve both the AI's decisions and explanations through human interaction.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-03T15:38:57Z)
• Human Oversight of Artificial Intelligence and Technical Standardisation [0.0]
  Within the global governance of AI, the requirement for human oversight is embodied in several regulatory formats. The EU legislator is therefore going much further than in the past in "spelling out" the legal requirement for human oversight. The question of the place of humans in the AI decision-making process should be given particular attention.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-02T07:43:46Z)
• AI-Powered Autonomous Weapons Risk Geopolitical Instability and Threaten AI Research [6.96356867602455]
  We argue that the recent embrace of machine learning in the development of autonomous weapons systems (AWS) creates serious risks to geopolitical stability and the free exchange of ideas in AI research. ML is already enabling the substitution of AWS for human soldiers in many battlefield roles, reducing the upfront human cost, and thus political cost, of waging offensive war. Further, the military value of AWS raises the specter of an AI-powered arms race and the misguided imposition of national security restrictions on AI research.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-03T05:19:45Z)
• Ten Hard Problems in Artificial Intelligence We Must Get Right [72.99597122935903]
  We explore the AI2050 "hard problems" that block the promise of AI and cause AI risks. For each problem, we outline the area, identify significant recent work, and suggest ways forward.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-06T23:16:41Z)
• Bad, mad, and cooked: Moral responsibility for civilian harms in human-AI military teams [0.0]
  This chapter explores moral responsibility for civilian harms by human-artificial intelligence (AI) teams. increasingly militaries may 'cook' their good apples by putting them in untenable decision-making environments. This chapter offers new mechanisms to map out conditions for moral responsibility in human-AI teams.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-31T10:18:20Z)
• Fairness in Agreement With European Values: An Interdisciplinary Perspective on AI Regulation [61.77881142275982]
  This interdisciplinary position paper considers various concerns surrounding fairness and discrimination in AI, and discusses how AI regulations address them. We first look at AI and fairness through the lenses of law, (AI) industry, sociotechnology, and (moral) philosophy, and present various perspectives. We identify and propose the roles AI Regulation should take to make the endeavor of the AI Act a success in terms of AI fairness concerns.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-08T12:32:08Z)
• Developing a Trusted Human-AI Network for Humanitarian Benefit [0.0]
  We consider the integration of a communications protocol, distributed ledger technology, and information fusion with artificial intelligence (AI) Such a trusted human-AI communication network could provide accountable information exchange regarding protected entities, critical infrastructure; humanitarian signals and status updates for humans and machines in conflicts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-07T11:58:51Z)
• Trustworthy AI: A Computational Perspective [54.80482955088197]
  We focus on six of the most crucial dimensions in achieving trustworthy AI: (i) Safety & Robustness, (ii) Non-discrimination & Fairness, (iii) Explainability, (iv) Privacy, (v) Accountability & Auditability, and (vi) Environmental Well-Being. For each dimension, we review the recent related technologies according to a taxonomy and summarize their applications in real-world systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-12T14:21:46Z)
• Building Bridges: Generative Artworks to Explore AI Ethics [56.058588908294446]
  In recent years, there has been an increased emphasis on understanding and mitigating adverse impacts of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies on society. A significant challenge in the design of ethical AI systems is that there are multiple stakeholders in the AI pipeline, each with their own set of constraints and interests. This position paper outlines some potential ways in which generative artworks can play this role by serving as accessible and powerful educational tools.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-25T22:31:55Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.