Challenges in Guardrailing Large Language Models for Science

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2411.08181v1
• Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2024 20:57:12 GMT
• Title: Challenges in Guardrailing Large Language Models for Science
• Authors: Nishan Pantha, Muthukumaran Ramasubramanian, Iksha Gurung, Manil Maskey, Rahul Ramachandran,
• Abstract summary: We provide guidelines for deploying large language models (LLMs) in the scientific domain. We identify specific challenges -- including time sensitivity, knowledge contextualization, conflict resolution, and intellectual property concerns. These guardrail dimensions include trustworthiness, ethics & bias, safety, and legal aspects.
• Score: 0.21990652930491852
• License:
• Abstract: The rapid development in large language models (LLMs) has transformed the landscape of natural language processing and understanding (NLP/NLU), offering significant benefits across various domains. However, when applied to scientific research, these powerful models exhibit critical failure modes related to scientific integrity and trustworthiness. Existing general-purpose LLM guardrails are insufficient to address these unique challenges in the scientific domain. We provide comprehensive guidelines for deploying LLM guardrails in the scientific domain. We identify specific challenges -- including time sensitivity, knowledge contextualization, conflict resolution, and intellectual property concerns -- and propose a guideline framework for the guardrails that can align with scientific needs. These guardrail dimensions include trustworthiness, ethics & bias, safety, and legal aspects. We also outline in detail the implementation strategies that employ white-box, black-box, and gray-box methodologies that can be enforced within scientific contexts.

Related papers

• SciSafeEval: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Safety Alignment of Large Language Models in Scientific Tasks [36.99233361224705]
  Large language models (LLMs) have had a transformative impact on a variety of scientific tasks across disciplines such as biology, chemistry, medicine, and physics. Existing benchmarks primarily focus on textual content and overlooking key scientific representations such as molecular, protein, and genomic languages. We introduce SciSafeEval, a benchmark designed to evaluate the safety alignment of LLMs across a range of scientific tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-02T16:34:48Z)
• SciLitLLM: How to Adapt LLMs for Scientific Literature Understanding [22.131371019641417]
  Despite Large Language Models' success, they face challenges in scientific literature understanding. We propose a hybrid strategy that integrates continual pre-training (CPT) and supervised fine-tuning (SFT) We present a suite of LLMs: SciLitLLM, specialized in scientific literature understanding.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-28T05:41:52Z)
• Building Understandable Messaging for Policy and Evidence Review (BUMPER) with AI [0.3495246564946556]
  We introduce a framework for the use of large language models (LLMs) in Building Understandable Messaging for Policy and Evidence Review (BUMPER) LLMs are capable of providing interfaces for understanding and synthesizing large databases of diverse media. We argue that this framework can facilitate accessibility of and confidence in scientific evidence for policymakers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-27T05:03:03Z)
• A Comprehensive Survey of Scientific Large Language Models and Their Applications in Scientific Discovery [68.48094108571432]
  Large language models (LLMs) have revolutionized the way text and other modalities of data are handled. We aim to provide a more holistic view of the research landscape by unveiling cross-field and cross-modal connections between scientific LLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-16T08:03:24Z)
• ALERT: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Assessing Large Language Models' Safety through Red Teaming [64.86326523181553]
  ALERT is a large-scale benchmark to assess safety based on a novel fine-grained risk taxonomy. It aims to identify vulnerabilities, inform improvements, and enhance the overall safety of the language models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-06T15:01:47Z)
• Prioritizing Safeguarding Over Autonomy: Risks of LLM Agents for Science [65.77763092833348]
  Intelligent agents powered by large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated substantial promise in autonomously conducting experiments and facilitating scientific discoveries across various disciplines. While their capabilities are promising, these agents also introduce novel vulnerabilities that demand careful consideration for safety. This paper conducts a thorough examination of vulnerabilities in LLM-based agents within scientific domains, shedding light on potential risks associated with their misuse and emphasizing the need for safety measures.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-06T18:54:07Z)
• Scientific Large Language Models: A Survey on Biological & Chemical Domains [47.97810890521825]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have emerged as a transformative power in enhancing natural language comprehension. The application of LLMs extends beyond conventional linguistic boundaries, encompassing specialized linguistic systems developed within various scientific disciplines. As a burgeoning area in the community of AI for Science, scientific LLMs warrant comprehensive exploration.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-26T05:33:34Z)
• A Comprehensive Study of Knowledge Editing for Large Language Models [82.65729336401027]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown extraordinary capabilities in understanding and generating text that closely mirrors human communication. This paper defines the knowledge editing problem and provides a comprehensive review of cutting-edge approaches. We introduce a new benchmark, KnowEdit, for a comprehensive empirical evaluation of representative knowledge editing approaches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-02T16:54:58Z)
• An Interdisciplinary Outlook on Large Language Models for Scientific Research [3.4108358650013573]
  We describe the capabilities and constraints of Large Language Models (LLMs) within disparate academic disciplines, aiming to delineate their strengths and limitations with precision. We examine how LLMs augment scientific inquiry, offering concrete examples such as accelerating literature review by summarizing vast numbers of publications. We articulate the challenges LLMs face, including their reliance on extensive and sometimes biased datasets, and the potential ethical dilemmas stemming from their use.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-03T19:41:09Z)
• SciBench: Evaluating College-Level Scientific Problem-Solving Abilities of Large Language Models [70.5763210869525]
  We introduce an expansive benchmark suite SciBench for Large Language Model (LLM) SciBench contains a dataset featuring a range of collegiate-level scientific problems from mathematics, chemistry, and physics domains. The results reveal that the current LLMs fall short of delivering satisfactory performance, with the best overall score of merely 43.22%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-20T07:01:57Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.