What You See is Not What You Get: Neural Partial Differential Equations and The Illusion of Learning

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2411.15101v1
• Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2024 18:04:46 GMT
• Title: What You See is Not What You Get: Neural Partial Differential Equations and The Illusion of Learning
• Authors: Arvind Mohan, Ashesh Chattopadhyay, Jonah Miller,
• Abstract summary: Differentiable Programming for scientific machine learning embeds neural networks inside PDEs, often called as NeuralPDEs, derived from first principle physics. There is a widespread assumption in the community that NeuralPDEs are more trustworthy and generalizable than black box models. We ask: Are NeuralPDEs and differentiable programming models trained on PDE simulations as physically interpretable as we think?
• Score: 0.0
• License:
• Abstract: Differentiable Programming for scientific machine learning (SciML) has recently seen considerable interest and success, as it directly embeds neural networks inside PDEs, often called as NeuralPDEs, derived from first principle physics. Therefore, there is a widespread assumption in the community that NeuralPDEs are more trustworthy and generalizable than black box models. However, like any SciML model, differentiable programming relies predominantly on high-quality PDE simulations as "ground truth" for training. However, mathematics dictates that these are only discrete numerical approximations of the true physics. Therefore, we ask: Are NeuralPDEs and differentiable programming models trained on PDE simulations as physically interpretable as we think? In this work, we rigorously attempt to answer these questions, using established ideas from numerical analysis, experiments, and analysis of model Jacobians. Our study shows that NeuralPDEs learn the artifacts in the simulation training data arising from the discretized Taylor Series truncation error of the spatial derivatives. Additionally, NeuralPDE models are systematically biased, and their generalization capability is likely enabled by a fortuitous interplay of numerical dissipation and truncation error in the training dataset and NeuralPDE, which seldom happens in practical applications. This bias manifests aggressively even in relatively accessible 1-D equations, raising concerns about the veracity of differentiable programming on complex, high-dimensional, real-world PDEs, and in dataset integrity of foundation models. Further, we observe that the initial condition constrains the truncation error in initial-value problems in PDEs, thereby exerting limitations to extrapolation. Finally, we demonstrate that an eigenanalysis of model weights can indicate a priori if the model will be inaccurate for out-of-distribution testing.

Related papers

• DimOL: Dimensional Awareness as A New 'Dimension' in Operator Learning [63.5925701087252]
  We introduce DimOL (Dimension-aware Operator Learning), drawing insights from dimensional analysis. To implement DimOL, we propose the ProdLayer, which can be seamlessly integrated into FNO-based and Transformer-based PDE solvers. Empirically, DimOL models achieve up to 48% performance gain within the PDE datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-08T10:48:50Z)
• Text2PDE: Latent Diffusion Models for Accessible Physics Simulation [7.16525545814044]
  We introduce several methods to apply latent diffusion models to physics simulation. We show that the proposed approach is competitive with current neural PDE solvers in both accuracy and efficiency. By introducing a scalable, accurate, and usable physics simulator, we hope to bring neural PDE solvers closer to practical use.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-02T01:09:47Z)
• Filtered Partial Differential Equations: a robust surrogate constraint in physics-informed deep learning framework [1.220743263007369]
  We propose a surrogate constraint (filtered PDE, FPDE in short) of the original physical equations to reduce the influence of noisy and sparse observation data. In the noise and sparsity experiment, the proposed FPDE models have better robustness than the conventional PDE models. For combining real-world experiment data into physics-informed training, the proposed FPDE constraint is useful.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-07T07:38:23Z)
• Discovering Interpretable Physical Models using Symbolic Regression and Discrete Exterior Calculus [55.2480439325792]
  We propose a framework that combines Symbolic Regression (SR) and Discrete Exterior Calculus (DEC) for the automated discovery of physical models. DEC provides building blocks for the discrete analogue of field theories, which are beyond the state-of-the-art applications of SR to physical problems. We prove the effectiveness of our methodology by re-discovering three models of Continuum Physics from synthetic experimental data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-10T13:23:05Z)
• Learning Neural Constitutive Laws From Motion Observations for Generalizable PDE Dynamics [97.38308257547186]
  Many NN approaches learn an end-to-end model that implicitly models both the governing PDE and material models. We argue that the governing PDEs are often well-known and should be explicitly enforced rather than learned. We introduce a new framework termed "Neural Constitutive Laws" (NCLaw) which utilizes a network architecture that strictly guarantees standard priors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-27T17:42:24Z)
• Generalized Neural Closure Models with Interpretability [28.269731698116257]
  We develop a novel and versatile methodology of unified neural partial delay differential equations. We augment existing/low-fidelity dynamical models directly in their partial differential equation (PDE) forms with both Markovian and non-Markovian neural network (NN) closure parameterizations. We demonstrate the new generalized neural closure models (gnCMs) framework using four sets of experiments based on advecting nonlinear waves, shocks, and ocean acidification models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-15T21:57:43Z)
• KoopmanLab: machine learning for solving complex physics equations [7.815723299913228]
  We present KoopmanLab, an efficient module of the Koopman neural operator family, for learning PDEs without analytic solutions or closed forms. Our module consists of multiple variants of the Koopman neural operator (KNO), a kind of mesh-independent neural-network-based PDE solvers. The compact variants of KNO can accurately solve PDEs with small model sizes while the large variants of KNO are more competitive in predicting highly complicated dynamic systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-03T13:58:39Z)
• Mixed Effects Neural ODE: A Variational Approximation for Analyzing the Dynamics of Panel Data [50.23363975709122]
  We propose a probabilistic model called ME-NODE to incorporate (fixed + random) mixed effects for analyzing panel data. We show that our model can be derived using smooth approximations of SDEs provided by the Wong-Zakai theorem. We then derive Evidence Based Lower Bounds for ME-NODE, and develop (efficient) training algorithms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-18T22:41:51Z)
• NeuralPDE: Modelling Dynamical Systems from Data [0.44259821861543996]
  We propose NeuralPDE, a model which combines convolutional neural networks (CNNs) with differentiable ODE solvers to model dynamical systems. We show that the Method of Lines used in standard PDE solvers can be represented using convolutions which makes CNNs the natural choice to parametrize arbitrary PDE dynamics. Our model can be applied to any data without requiring any prior knowledge about the governing PDE.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-15T10:59:52Z)
• Large-scale Neural Solvers for Partial Differential Equations [48.7576911714538]
  Solving partial differential equations (PDE) is an indispensable part of many branches of science as many processes can be modelled in terms of PDEs. Recent numerical solvers require manual discretization of the underlying equation as well as sophisticated, tailored code for distributed computing. We examine the applicability of continuous, mesh-free neural solvers for partial differential equations, physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) We discuss the accuracy of GatedPINN with respect to analytical solutions -- as well as state-of-the-art numerical solvers, such as spectral solvers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-08T13:26:51Z)
• Stochasticity in Neural ODEs: An Empirical Study [68.8204255655161]
  Regularization of neural networks (e.g. dropout) is a widespread technique in deep learning that allows for better generalization. We show that data augmentation during the training improves the performance of both deterministic and versions of the same model. However, the improvements obtained by the data augmentation completely eliminate the empirical regularization gains, making the performance of neural ODE and neural SDE negligible.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-22T22:12:56Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.