When Is Heterogeneity Actionable for Personalization?

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2411.16552v1
• Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2024 16:37:17 GMT
• Title: When Is Heterogeneity Actionable for Personalization?
• Authors: Anya Shchetkina, Ron Berman,
• Abstract summary: Personalization can be used to improve outcomes beyond the uniform policy that assigns the best performing treatment in an A/B test to everyone. We develop a statistical model to quantify "actionable heterogeneity," or the conditions when personalization is likely to outperform the best uniform policy.
• Score: 0.0
• License:
• Abstract: Targeting and personalization policies can be used to improve outcomes beyond the uniform policy that assigns the best performing treatment in an A/B test to everyone. Personalization relies on the presence of heterogeneity of treatment effects, yet, as we show in this paper, heterogeneity alone is not sufficient for personalization to be successful. We develop a statistical model to quantify "actionable heterogeneity," or the conditions when personalization is likely to outperform the best uniform policy. We show that actionable heterogeneity can be visualized as crossover interactions in outcomes across treatments and depends on three population-level parameters: within-treatment heterogeneity, cross-treatment correlation, and the variation in average responses. Our model can be used to predict the expected gain from personalization prior to running an experiment and also allows for sensitivity analysis, providing guidance on how changing treatments can affect the personalization gain. To validate our model, we apply five common personalization approaches to two large-scale field experiments with many interventions that encouraged flu vaccination. We find an 18% gain from personalization in one and a more modest 4% gain in the other, which is consistent with our model. Counterfactual analysis shows that this difference in the gains from personalization is driven by a drastic difference in within-treatment heterogeneity. However, reducing cross-treatment correlation holds a larger potential to further increase personalization gains. Our findings provide a framework for assessing the potential from personalization and offer practical recommendations for improving gains from targeting in multi-intervention settings.

Related papers

• Few-shot Steerable Alignment: Adapting Rewards and LLM Policies with Neural Processes [50.544186914115045]
  Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly embedded in everyday applications. Ensuring their alignment with the diverse preferences of individual users has become a critical challenge. We present a novel framework for few-shot steerable alignment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-18T16:14:59Z)
• Estimating Individual Dose-Response Curves under Unobserved Confounders from Observational Data [6.166869525631879]
  We present ContiVAE, a novel framework for estimating causal effects of continuous treatments, measured by individual dose-response curves. We show that ContiVAE outperforms existing methods by up to 62%, demonstrating its robustness and flexibility.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-21T07:24:26Z)
• Reduced-Rank Multi-objective Policy Learning and Optimization [57.978477569678844]
  In practice, causal researchers do not have a single outcome in mind a priori. In government-assisted social benefit programs, policymakers collect many outcomes to understand the multidimensional nature of poverty. We present a data-driven dimensionality-reduction methodology for multiple outcomes in the context of optimal policy learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-29T08:16:30Z)
• Improving Personalisation in Valence and Arousal Prediction using Data Augmentation [2.447631206868802]
  This paper presents our work on an enhanced personalisation strategy, that leverages data augmentation to develop tailored models. Our proposed approach, Distance Weighting Augmentation (DWA), employs a weighting-based augmentation method that expands a target individual's dataset. Experimental results on the MuSe-Personalisation 2023 Challenge dataset demonstrate that our method significantly improves the performance of features sets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-13T16:57:37Z)
• Ambiguous Medical Image Segmentation using Diffusion Models [60.378180265885945]
  We introduce a single diffusion model-based approach that produces multiple plausible outputs by learning a distribution over group insights. Our proposed model generates a distribution of segmentation masks by leveraging the inherent sampling process of diffusion. Comprehensive results show that our proposed approach outperforms existing state-of-the-art ambiguous segmentation networks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-10T17:58:22Z)
• Undersmoothing Causal Estimators with Generative Trees [0.0]
  Inferring individualised treatment effects from observational data can unlock the potential for targeted interventions. It is, however, hard to infer these effects from observational data. In this paper, we explore a novel generative tree based approach that tackles model misspecification directly.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-16T11:59:38Z)
• SelectAugment: Hierarchical Deterministic Sample Selection for Data Augmentation [72.58308581812149]
  We propose an effective approach, dubbed SelectAugment, to select samples to be augmented in a deterministic and online manner. Specifically, in each batch, we first determine the augmentation ratio, and then decide whether to augment each training sample under this ratio. In this way, the negative effects of the randomness in selecting samples to augment can be effectively alleviated and the effectiveness of DA is improved.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-06T08:38:38Z)
• A Twin Neural Model for Uplift [59.38563723706796]
  Uplift is a particular case of conditional treatment effect modeling. We propose a new loss function defined by leveraging a connection with the Bayesian interpretation of the relative risk. We show our proposed method is competitive with the state-of-the-art in simulation setting and on real data from large scale randomized experiments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-11T16:02:39Z)
• Adversarial Sample Enhanced Domain Adaptation: A Case Study on Predictive Modeling with Electronic Health Records [57.75125067744978]
  We propose a data augmentation method to facilitate domain adaptation. adversarially generated samples are used during domain adaptation. Results confirm the effectiveness of our method and the generality on different tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-01-13T03:20:20Z)
• Treatment Allocation with Strategic Agents [0.0]
  We show that the optimal rule can involve randomization, allocating treatments with less than 100% probability even to those who respond positively on average to the treatment. We propose a sequential experiment based on Bayesian Optimization that converges to the optimal treatment rule without parametric assumptions on individual strategic behavior.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-12T17:40:53Z)
• Split-Treatment Analysis to Rank Heterogeneous Causal Effects for Prospective Interventions [15.443178111068418]
  We propose a split-treatment analysis that ranks the individuals most likely to be positively affected by a prospective intervention. We show that the ranking of heterogeneous causal effect based on the proxy treatment is the same as the ranking based on the target treatment's effect.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-11T16:17:29Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.